Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraKaitaba StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

Kagera Sugar vs Azam: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kagera Sugar play Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 31 August 2026. Venue: Kaitaba Stadium.

Current form

Kagera Sugar: 0-1-3, 0.25 points/match. Azam: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kagera Sugar scores 1.00 and concedes 2.75 goals per match. Azam scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kagera Sugar 75%, Azam 100%. Over 2.5: Kagera Sugar 50%, Azam 75%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.91 vs 1.62. Kagera Sugar: 7.5 shots per match, Azam: 12.3.

Match halves

Kagera Sugar: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25. Azam: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Kagera Sugar: 31-45+ (2 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.75
Kagera SugarAzam
2.75Goals conceded / match1.25
Kagera SugarAzam
49%Average possession56%
Kagera SugarAzam
4Shots on target / match6.5
Kagera SugarAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.5Shots per match12.25
Kagera SugarAzam
4Shots on target6.5
Kagera SugarAzam
13.3%Shot conversion14.3%
Kagera SugarAzam
49%Possession56%
Kagera SugarAzam
1.62xG for1.91
Kagera SugarAzam
1.74xG against1.51
Kagera SugarAzam

Shooting quality

Kagera Sugar: Efficient finishingAzam: Efficient finishing
Kagera SugarAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)53%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 700% better for: last-5 form.

0.25 pts / match - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / match - Azam

Kagera Sugar
LDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Azam
DWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Kagera Sugar · 1.75 goals / match - Azam

Azam is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.75 goals / match - Kagera Sugar · 1.25 goals / match - Azam

Kagera Sugar scoring profile: very strong

Kagera Sugar scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Kagera Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
Kagera SugarAzam
11Goals conceded (season)5
Kagera SugarAzam
3.75Average goals in match3
Kagera SugarAzam
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Kagera SugarAzam
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kagera SugarAzam

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%2 goals75%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%3 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%4 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%2 goals25%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%3 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%4 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%BTTS in both halves0%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Scored in both halves50%
Kagera SugarAzam

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%BTTS - last 5100%
Kagera SugarAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kagera SugarAzam

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kagera SugarAzam
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / match - Azam

Kagera Sugar - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Azam - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)2
Kagera SugarAzam
0.75Goals scored (1st half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Kagera SugarAzam
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.25
Kagera SugarAzam
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%No goal before half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Kagera SugarAzam
1.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
2Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Kagera SugarAzam
0%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%No goal after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

Kagera Sugar - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Azam - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kagera Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.500.00
Goals scored / match0.80.3
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal25%75%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match1.31.8
1 goal75%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%25%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kagera Sugar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kagera Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
275%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Kagera SugarLigaAzam
Average goals in match 3.752.59 3.00
Both teams scored 75%53% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 75%
Clean sheets 0%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Kagera Sugar and Azam play?

Kagera Sugar face Azam on 31 August 2026 in Ligi kuu Bara at Kaitaba Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kagera Sugar vs Azam?

Kagera Sugar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Azam 1.75. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kagera Sugar's matches and 100% of Azam's.

What form are Kagera Sugar and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Kagera Sugar have a 0-1-3 record (0.25 points per game) and Azam 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kagera Sugar vs Azam?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.