Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI: match statistics

Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia
1 : 2half-time 0:1
ENPPI crest
ENPPI
120%(3.32)
X35%(2.88)
245%(2.17)

ENPPI presents decidedly better form and defensive stability in away matches. Kahraba Ismailia sits in 19th place and holds a catastrophic home record – 0% wins, 89% losses, and an average of 2.56 goals conceded per match. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet at their own stadium this season. Conversely, ENPPI has a balanced away goal difference (0), 33% clean sheets, and 67% draws in away games, indicating a solid defense. The form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), but Kahraba's drastic weakness at home gives ENPPI a real chance for full points. The advantage in possession (54% vs 43%) and better defensive efficiency argue for an away win or at least a draw.

Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kahraba Ismailia play ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Kahraba Ismailia: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.06 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. ENPPI scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kahraba Ismailia 67%, ENPPI 46%. Over 2.5: Kahraba Ismailia 52%, ENPPI 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Kahraba Ismailia has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.14. Kahraba Ismailia: 9.4 shots per match, ENPPI: 9.0.

Match halves

Kahraba Ismailia: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.79. ENPPI: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Kahraba Ismailia: 46-60 (10 goals). ENPPI: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

ENPPI presents decidedly better form and defensive stability in away matches. Kahraba Ismailia sits in 19th place and holds a catastrophic home record – 0% wins, 89% losses, and an average of 2.56 goals conceded per match. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet at their own stadium this season. Conversely, ENPPI has a balanced away goal difference (0), 33% clean sheets, and 67% draws in away games, indicating a solid defense. The form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), but Kahraba's drastic weakness at home gives ENPPI a real chance for full points. The advantage in possession (54% vs 43%) and better defensive efficiency argue for an away win or at least a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
4Shots9
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0Shots on target1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.67xG1.07
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
8Corners7
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
56Dangerous attacks59
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
-1Fouls-1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
2Cards1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.06Goals scored / match1.04
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.61Goals conceded / match0.96
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
46%Average possession50%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3.21Shots on target / match3.12
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.39Shots per match9
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3.21Shots on target3.12
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
11.3%Shot conversion11.5%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
46%Possession50%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.18xG for1.14
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.56xG against1.31
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Shooting quality

Kahraba Ismailia: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kahraba Ismailia is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.6 pts / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia
DWLDD
Season result split
21% W33% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-15
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-7-12
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
ENPPI
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ENPPI is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.96 goals / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 79% of matches (26 of 33 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: very strong

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

35Goals scored (season)27
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
53Goals conceded (season)25
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
2.67Average goals in match2
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal69%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
27%2 goals27%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0%3 goals8%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal58%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
45%2 goals31%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
18%3 goals8%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
12%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 33 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time19%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
15%Scored in both halves15%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
40%BTTS - last 560%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

48%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ENPPI is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.23 pts / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
15% leading52% draw33% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
27% leading42% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.23
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.79Average goals (1st half)1.08
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
64%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
76%No goal before half-time58%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.88Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
30%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
30%No goal after half-time58%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

21% W45% R33% P
32
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
4
8
31-45
10
7
46-60
9
11
61-75
7
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kahraba IsmailiaLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.672.02 2.00
Both teams scored 67%47% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%34% 35%
Clean sheets 18%35% 42%
Goal before half-time 48%58% 65%
Goal after half-time 91%70% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Kahraba Ismailia 1:2 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

Kahraba Ismailia score 1.06 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.04. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Kahraba Ismailia's matches and 46% of ENPPI's.

What form are Kahraba Ismailia and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Kahraba Ismailia have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and ENPPI 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.