Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI: match statistics

Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia
1 : 2half-time 0:1
ENPPI crest
ENPPI
120%(3.32)
X35%(2.88)
245%(2.17)

ENPPI presents decidedly better form and defensive stability in away matches. Kahraba Ismailia sits in 19th place and holds a catastrophic home record – 0% wins, 89% losses, and an average of 2.56 goals conceded per match. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet at their own stadium this season. Conversely, ENPPI has a balanced away goal difference (0), 33% clean sheets, and 67% draws in away games, indicating a solid defense. The form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), but Kahraba's drastic weakness at home gives ENPPI a real chance for full points. The advantage in possession (54% vs 43%) and better defensive efficiency argue for an away win or at least a draw.

Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kahraba Ismailia played ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Kahraba Ismailia: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. ENPPI: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.11 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. ENPPI scores 0.94 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kahraba Ismailia 63%, ENPPI 44%. Over 2.5: Kahraba Ismailia 58%, ENPPI 28%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Kahraba Ismailia has higher xG: 1.16 vs 1.12. Kahraba Ismailia: 9.3 shots per match, ENPPI: 8.8.

Match halves

Kahraba Ismailia: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.79. ENPPI: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Kahraba Ismailia: 46-60 (6 goals). ENPPI: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ENPPI presents decidedly better form and defensive stability in away matches. Kahraba Ismailia sits in 19th place and holds a catastrophic home record – 0% wins, 89% losses, and an average of 2.56 goals conceded per match. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet at their own stadium this season. Conversely, ENPPI has a balanced away goal difference (0), 33% clean sheets, and 67% draws in away games, indicating a solid defense. The form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 1.6 PPG for the hosts), but Kahraba's drastic weakness at home gives ENPPI a real chance for full points. The advantage in possession (54% vs 43%) and better defensive efficiency argue for an away win or at least a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
4Shots9
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0Shots on target1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.67xG1.07
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
8Corners7
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
56Dangerous attacks59
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
-1Fouls-1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
2Cards1
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.11Goals scored / match0.94
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.84Goals conceded / match0.83
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
44%Average possession52%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3.47Shots on target / match3.11
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.26Shots per match8.83
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
3.47Shots on target3.11
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
11.9%Shot conversion10.7%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
44%Possession52%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.16xG for1.12
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.63xG against1.29
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Shooting quality

Kahraba Ismailia: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kahraba Ismailia is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 1 pts / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia
WLDDW
Season result split
21% W21% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-11
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
ENPPI
DLDLW
Season result split
28% W50% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-4
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-2
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kahraba Ismailia is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.94 goals / match - ENPPI

ENPPI is 122% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.83 goals / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: very strong

ENPPI scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

21Goals scored (season)17
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
35Goals conceded (season)15
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
2.95Average goals in match1.78
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal67%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
32%2 goals17%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0%3 goals11%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal56%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
53%2 goals28%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
21%3 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
21%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 19 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time17%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
16%Scored in both halves17%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
80%BTTS - last 560%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ENPPI is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.17 pts / match - ENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
22% leading50% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.17
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.84Average goals (1st half)0.83
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
63%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
74%No goal before half-time61%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.44
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
1.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
2.11Average goals (2nd half)0.94
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
26%Clean sheet after half-time72%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI
32%No goal after half-time56%
Kahraba IsmailiaENPPI

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

21% W37% D42% L
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - second-half results

33% W44% D22% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.80
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
6
9
61-75
3
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kahraba IsmailiaLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.952.03 1.78
Both teams scored 63%47% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%34% 28%
Clean sheets 16%34% 44%
Goal before half-time 53%58% 61%
Goal after half-time 95%70% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kahraba IsmailiaRed cardJoseph Jonathan Ngwem
  2. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Essam El FayoumiOff: Omar El Said
  3. ENPPIYellow cardMarwan Mohamed Dawoud
  4. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Ahmed HamzaOff: Youssef Galal
  5. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Ahmed IsmailOff: Aqtay Abdallah
  6. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Abdallah MaradonaOff: Serge Arnaud Aka
  7. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Salah Mohamed ZayedOff: Emad Mayhoub
  8. Kahraba IsmailiaGoalAli Sulieman
  9. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Mohab SamyOff: Marwan Mohamed Dawoud

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Kahraba Ismailia 1:2 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

Kahraba Ismailia score 1.11 goals per game on average and ENPPI 0.94. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Kahraba Ismailia's matches and 44% of ENPPI's.

What form are Kahraba Ismailia and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Kahraba Ismailia have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and ENPPI 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kahraba Ismailia vs ENPPI?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.