Kaisar vs Ulytau: match statistics
Kaisar vs Ulytau: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kaisar played Ulytau in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 20 June 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Kaisar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Ulytau: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kaisar scores 0.79 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Ulytau scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kaisar 57%, Ulytau 54%. Over 2.5: Kaisar 36%, Ulytau 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Ulytau has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.21. Kaisar: 11.1 shots per match, Ulytau: 11.9.
Match halves
Kaisar: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.14. Ulytau: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Kaisar: 0-15 (4 goals). Ulytau: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a draw: Kaisar records as many as 63% draws at home and only 13% wins, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 goals (record 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss). Ulytau sit higher in the table (5th vs 12th) and have 6 wins this season versus Kaisar’s 2, but on the road the visitors average only 0.67 goals and failed to score in 50% of away matches. Quality of chances is similar — average xG is 1.26 for Kaisar at home and 1.31 for Ulytau away — while Kaisar register more shots on target (3.88 vs 3.0) and have a higher shooting conversion at home (8% vs 6%). Defensively Kaisar concede less at home (1.13 vs 1.5 goals per game) and have 25% of matches without scoring and 25% clean sheets, suggesting a low-scoring, tight game. Considering 7 vs 5 goals in the last 5 matches and identical 1.6 points per game in that period, I assess the probability of a draw at about 50%, home win 30% and away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - Yes is recent form: in the last 5 matches Kaisar had BTTS in 80% of games, Ulytau in 60%, while the league average is 52%. Both teams generate meaningful xG — Kaisar 1.43 xG on average this season vs 1.31 xG for Ulytau, and over the last 5 matches the average xG is 1.23 (Kaisar) and 1.36 (Ulytau), indicating real goal-scoring opportunities on both sides. Although seasonally Ulytau scores only 0.67 goals per game and Kaisar concedes only 0.57 goals per game, the last 5 matches show Kaisar concedes on average 1.2 goals and has an xG against of 2.01, meaning the home defense has been more vulnerable recently. Additionally, Kaisar averages 4.57 shots on target with an 11% conversion, while Ulytau has 3.0 shots on target with a 6% conversion and has scored 5 goals in the last 5 matches, so the visitors can also convert chances. Overall, given the 80% vs 60% BTTS in the last 5, both teams’ xG above ~1.2 and Kaisar’s weakened defense, the both teams to score scenario looks more likely — I recommend BTTS 'Yes' with probability 62% vs 38% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of ~2.80 goals: Kaisar ~1.52 and Ulytau ~1.28, calculated as the average of attacking xG and opponent’s defensive xG (Kaisar xG_for 1.43 vs Ulytau xG_against 1.60 → 1.52; Ulytau xG_for 1.31 vs Kaisar xG_against 1.24 → 1.28). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 — seasonally Kaisar has Over 1.5 in 57% of matches, Ulytau in 83% (average 70%), and in the last 5 matches Kaisar scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and Ulytau 5 goals (1.0), which strongly supports at least two goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonally Over 2.5 occurs 29% for Kaisar and 50% for Ulytau (average ~39.5%), but in the last 5 fixtures Kaisar has 60% Over 2.5 and Ulytau 40% (average 50%), and the projected total 2.80 gives a moderate edge for Over 2.5 (therefore I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at about 55%). Over 3.5 is unlikely: seasonally both teams have 0% Over 3.5, the projected total 2.80 and the combined last-5 average goals of 2.4 do not support more than 3 goals; therefore the best and strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast the most likely scenario is a half-time draw and a Kaisar victory at full-time (X/1). Kaisar win 71% of home matches and score an average of 1.29 goals per game, while Ulytau have only a 17% win rate and average 0.67 goals, giving the hosts a clear advantage. Half-time statistics show a mixed signal: across the season Kaisar were level at the break in 57% of matches and have 71% clean sheets at half-time, but in their last five games Kaisar led at the break in 60% of cases and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, whereas Ulytau have only 20% leads and 0.2 goals in their last five. Kaisar’s strong second-half output (on average 0.86 goals and 2.14 points in second halves) versus Ulytau’s poor post-break performance (0.17 goals and 0.67 points) supports the hosts deciding the game after the interval. Additionally, the hosts’ offensive efficiency (xG 1.43 vs 1.31, 4.57 shots on target vs 3.0, and conversion 11% vs 6%) suggests Kaisar have the tools to turn the result in their favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kaisar | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ulytau is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Kaisar · 1.6 pts / match - Ulytau
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulytau is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
0.79 goals / match - Kaisar · 1 goals / match - Ulytau
Ulytau is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Kaisar · 1 goals / match - Ulytau
Kaisar scores in 57% of matches (8 of 14 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
Ulytau scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Kaisar keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kaisar
Over / Under - Ulytau
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kaisar is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Kaisar · 1.23 pts / match - Ulytau
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kaisar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kaisar
Ulytau
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kaisar | Liga | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.07 | 2.21 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 30% | • 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 57% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 70% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Kaisar 0 - 2 - 0 Ulytau. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kaisar vs Ulytau?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kaisar 0:0 Ulytau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kaisar and Ulytau?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kaisar won 0, Ulytau won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kaisar vs Ulytau?
Kaisar score 0.79 goals per game on average and Ulytau 1.00. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Kaisar's matches and 54% of Ulytau's.
What form are Kaisar and Ulytau in?
Over the last 5 games Kaisar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ulytau 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kaisar vs Ulytau?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kaisar vs Ulytau: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


