Kaizer Chiefs vs Orlando Pirates: match statistics
Orlando Pirates, as the table leader, presents significantly better form than Kaizer Chiefs, confirmed by their away match statistics – 63% wins and an impressive goal difference of 19:4. The visitors have earned 10 points in their last five matches (2.0 PPG), while the hosts have managed only 6 points (1.2 PPG), losing three of their last five encounters. Kaizer Chiefs struggles with efficiency – a mere 7% shot conversion and only 40% wins at home, which contrasts with the 63% success rate of Pirates on the road and their 63% clean sheets. The advantage in expected goals (xG 1.69 vs 1.93 for the hosts) might seem smaller, but Pirates compensate with a significantly better defense (xGA 0.87 vs 0.95) and consistency in earning points. The form of both teams in recent matches (WLWLL for Chiefs vs WWWLD for Pirates) and the 19-point gap in the table favor the visitors, although Kaizer Chiefs' home ground could make the match competitive.
Kaizer Chiefs vs Orlando Pirates: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kaizer Chiefs played Orlando Pirates in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Kaizer Chiefs: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Orlando Pirates: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kaizer Chiefs scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Orlando Pirates scores 1.53 and concedes 0.41. League average: 1.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kaizer Chiefs 31%, Orlando Pirates 24%. Over 2.5: Kaizer Chiefs 19%, Orlando Pirates 29%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Kaizer Chiefs has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.82. Kaizer Chiefs: 16.1 shots per match, Orlando Pirates: 14.7.
Match halves
Kaizer Chiefs: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.56. Orlando Pirates: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Kaizer Chiefs: 31-45+ (4 goals). Orlando Pirates: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier Soccer League: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Orlando Pirates, as the table leader, presents significantly better form than Kaizer Chiefs, confirmed by their away match statistics – 63% wins and an impressive goal difference of 19:4. The visitors have earned 10 points in their last five matches (2.0 PPG), while the hosts have managed only 6 points (1.2 PPG), losing three of their last five encounters. Kaizer Chiefs struggles with efficiency – a mere 7% shot conversion and only 40% wins at home, which contrasts with the 63% success rate of Pirates on the road and their 63% clean sheets. The advantage in expected goals (xG 1.69 vs 1.93 for the hosts) might seem smaller, but Pirates compensate with a significantly better defense (xGA 0.87 vs 0.95) and consistency in earning points. The form of both teams in recent matches (WLWLL for Chiefs vs WWWLD for Pirates) and the 19-point gap in the table favor the visitors, although Kaizer Chiefs' home ground could make the match competitive.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kaizer Chiefs | Orlando Pirates | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Orlando Pirates is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Kaizer Chiefs · 2 pts / match - Orlando Pirates
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Orlando Pirates is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Kaizer Chiefs · 1.53 goals / match - Orlando Pirates
Orlando Pirates is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.5 goals / match - Kaizer Chiefs · 0.41 goals / match - Orlando Pirates
Kaizer Chiefs scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Orlando Pirates keeps a clean sheet in 71% (12 of 17 matches).
Orlando Pirates scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Kaizer Chiefs keeps a clean sheet in 69% (11 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kaizer Chiefs
Over / Under - Orlando Pirates
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Orlando Pirates is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Kaizer Chiefs · 2 pts / match - Orlando Pirates
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kaizer Chiefs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Orlando Pirates - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kaizer Chiefs
Orlando Pirates
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Kaizer Chiefs | Liga | Orlando Pirates | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.50 | 1.93 | • 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 35% | ▼ 24% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 28% | • 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 38% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Kaizer Chiefs vs Orlando Pirates?
The Premier Soccer League match finished Kaizer Chiefs 0:3 Orlando Pirates. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kaizer Chiefs vs Orlando Pirates?
Kaizer Chiefs score 1.00 goals per game on average and Orlando Pirates 1.53. The Premier Soccer League average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Kaizer Chiefs's matches and 24% of Orlando Pirates's.
What form are Kaizer Chiefs and Orlando Pirates in?
Over the last 5 games Kaizer Chiefs have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Orlando Pirates 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kaizer Chiefs vs Orlando Pirates?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.