Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908: match statistics

Kalamata crest
Kalamata
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Iraklis 1908 crest
Iraklis 1908
135%(2.50)
X35%(3.00)
230%(2.75)

We are dealing with an exceptionally balanced top-of-the-table clash between two league leaders; both teams are in first place and are showing identical form (2.6 points per game in their last 5 matches). Kalamata boasts an impressive home record - an 83% win rate at home, a +21 goal difference, and only 0.42 goals conceded per match. On the other hand, Iraklis 1908 remains unbeaten this entire season (18 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses) and has a perfect FTS% record away from home (0%). The key factor is the efficiency of both teams - Kalamata has a better shot conversion rate (26% vs 17%), but Iraklis takes more shots (9.67 vs 5.75) and registers more shots on target (4.08 vs 3.5). Considering the visitors' unbeaten streak, the hosts' solid defense, and the similar xG values of both sides, the most probable scenario is a hard-fought draw.

Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kalamata play Iraklis 1908 in Super League 2 (Greece). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kalamata: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Iraklis 1908: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kalamata scores 2.08 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. Iraklis 1908 scores 1.75 and concedes 0.63. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kalamata 36%, Iraklis 1908 50%. Over 2.5: Kalamata 40%, Iraklis 1908 50%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Iraklis 1908 has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.46. Kalamata: 4.2 shots per match, Iraklis 1908: 9.0.

Match halves

Kalamata: half-time lead 68%, second-half goals 1.04. Iraklis 1908: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.04.

Goals by minute

Kalamata: 76-90+ (11 goals). Iraklis 1908: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

We are dealing with an exceptionally balanced top-of-the-table clash between two league leaders; both teams are in first place and are showing identical form (2.6 points per game in their last 5 matches). Kalamata boasts an impressive home record - an 83% win rate at home, a +21 goal difference, and only 0.42 goals conceded per match. On the other hand, Iraklis 1908 remains unbeaten this entire season (18 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses) and has a perfect FTS% record away from home (0%). The key factor is the efficiency of both teams - Kalamata has a better shot conversion rate (26% vs 17%), but Iraklis takes more shots (9.67 vs 5.75) and registers more shots on target (4.08 vs 3.5). Considering the visitors' unbeaten streak, the hosts' solid defense, and the similar xG values of both sides, the most probable scenario is a hard-fought draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
KalamataIraklis 1908
9Shots13
KalamataIraklis 1908
2Shots on target3
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.22xG1.52
KalamataIraklis 1908
6Corners5
KalamataIraklis 1908
70Dangerous attacks67
KalamataIraklis 1908
-1Fouls-1
KalamataIraklis 1908
-1Cards-1
KalamataIraklis 1908

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KalamataIraklis 1908
2.08Goals scored / match1.75
KalamataIraklis 1908
0.48Goals conceded / match0.63
KalamataIraklis 1908
27%Average possession44%
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.52Shots on target / match3.5
KalamataIraklis 1908

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.16Shots per match9
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.52Shots on target3.5
KalamataIraklis 1908
50%Shot conversion19.4%
KalamataIraklis 1908
27%Possession44%
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.46xG for1.54
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.02xG against0.81
KalamataIraklis 1908

Shooting quality

Kalamata: Counter-attackingIraklis 1908: Counter-attacking
KalamataIraklis 1908
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.350.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.370.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kalamata is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Kalamata · 2 pts / match - Iraklis 1908

Kalamata
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
84% W12% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-3-1
2.64 pts / match · goal difference +40
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Iraklis 1908
WWDWL
Season result split
71% W25% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-6-1
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kalamata is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

2.08 goals / match - Kalamata · 1.75 goals / match - Iraklis 1908

Kalamata is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.48 goals / match - Kalamata · 0.63 goals / match - Iraklis 1908

Kalamata scoring profile: very strong

Kalamata scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Iraklis 1908 keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 matches).

Iraklis 1908 scoring profile: strong

Iraklis 1908 scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).

52Goals scored (season)42
KalamataIraklis 1908
12Goals conceded (season)15
KalamataIraklis 1908
2.56Average goals in match2.38
KalamataIraklis 1908
5Goals scored (last 5)6
KalamataIraklis 1908
0Goals conceded (last 5)2
KalamataIraklis 1908

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal88%
KalamataIraklis 1908
68%2 goals58%
KalamataIraklis 1908
28%3 goals21%
KalamataIraklis 1908
12%4 goals8%
KalamataIraklis 1908

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal54%
KalamataIraklis 1908
8%2 goals8%
KalamataIraklis 1908
0%3 goals0%
KalamataIraklis 1908
0%4 goals0%
KalamataIraklis 1908

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time25%
KalamataIraklis 1908
4%BTTS in both halves8%
KalamataIraklis 1908
48%Scored in both halves50%
KalamataIraklis 1908

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
KalamataIraklis 1908
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
KalamataIraklis 1908
0%BTTS - last 520%
KalamataIraklis 1908

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
KalamataIraklis 1908
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
KalamataIraklis 1908
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
KalamataIraklis 1908

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
KalamataIraklis 1908
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
KalamataIraklis 1908
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KalamataIraklis 1908

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kalamata is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.36 pts / match - Kalamata · 1.88 pts / match - Iraklis 1908

Kalamata - half-time state
68% leading32% draw0% trailing
Iraklis 1908 - half-time state
46% leading50% draw4% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.36Points per match (1st half)1.88
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.04Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KalamataIraklis 1908
0.16Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.2Average goals (1st half)1
KalamataIraklis 1908
84%Clean sheet before half-time71%
KalamataIraklis 1908
28%No goal before half-time33%
KalamataIraklis 1908

After half-time (2nd half)

2.2Points per match (2nd half)1.92
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)1.04
KalamataIraklis 1908
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KalamataIraklis 1908
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.38
KalamataIraklis 1908
72%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KalamataIraklis 1908
32%No goal after half-time29%
KalamataIraklis 1908

Kalamata - second-half results

64% W28% R8% P
59
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 68% of matches and wins 84%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Iraklis 1908 - second-half results

50% W42% R8% P
45
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kalamata - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Iraklis 1908 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kalamata
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
9
0
16-30
9
3
31-45
10
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Iraklis 1908
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
11
5
61-75
10
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kalamata

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Iraklis 1908

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

KalamataLigaIraklis 1908
Average goals in match 2.562.28 2.38
Both teams scored 36%40% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 50%
Clean sheets 60%34% 46%
Goal before half-time 72%64% 71%
Goal after half-time 76%75% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?

The Super League 2 match finished Kalamata 1:0 Iraklis 1908. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?

Kalamata score 2.08 goals per game on average and Iraklis 1908 1.75. The Super League 2 average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Kalamata's matches and 50% of Iraklis 1908's.

What form are Kalamata and Iraklis 1908 in?

Over the last 5 games Kalamata have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Iraklis 1908 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.