Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

Kalamata vs Marko: match statistics

Kalamata crest
Kalamata
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Marko crest
Marko
165%(1.18)
X22%(6.00)
213%(16.00)

Kalamata boasts an impressive home form with 80% wins and just 10% losses at their home ground. The hosts have scored 47 goals this season while conceding only 12, resulting in a +18 goal difference in home matches. Marko, on the other hand, struggles offensively on the road, averaging only 0.8 goals per game and failing to score in 40% of their away matches. Furthermore, the visitors' form in their last five matches is poor, averaging just 1 point per game. Kalamata also dominates in possession (54% vs 47%) and shot accuracy, which, combined with a solid defense (60% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage.

Kalamata vs Marko: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kalamata played Marko in Super League 2 (Greece). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kalamata: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Marko: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kalamata scores 2.35 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Marko scores 1.10 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kalamata 45%, Marko 35%. Over 2.5: Kalamata 50%, Marko 15%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Kalamata has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.50. Kalamata: 3.0 shots per match, Marko: 3.3.

Match halves

Kalamata: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.20. Marko: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Kalamata: 76-90+ (10 goals). Marko: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.25 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kalamata boasts an impressive home form with 80% wins and just 10% losses at their home ground. The hosts have scored 47 goals this season while conceding only 12, resulting in a +18 goal difference in home matches. Marko, on the other hand, struggles offensively on the road, averaging only 0.8 goals per game and failing to score in 40% of their away matches. Furthermore, the visitors' form in their last five matches is poor, averaging just 1 point per game. Kalamata also dominates in possession (54% vs 47%) and shot accuracy, which, combined with a solid defense (60% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
KalamataMarko
14Shots7
KalamataMarko
7Shots on target4
KalamataMarko
2.01xG1.1
KalamataMarko
3Corners1
KalamataMarko
87Dangerous attacks51
KalamataMarko
-1Fouls-1
KalamataMarko
-1Cards-1
KalamataMarko

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.35Goals scored / match1.1
KalamataMarko
0.6Goals conceded / match0.7
KalamataMarko
21%Average possession16%
KalamataMarko
1.15Shots on target / match1.05
KalamataMarko

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3Shots per match3.25
KalamataMarko
1.15Shots on target1.05
KalamataMarko
78.3%Shot conversion33.8%
KalamataMarko
21%Possession16%
KalamataMarko
1.64xG for1.5
KalamataMarko
0.96xG against1.25
KalamataMarko

Shooting quality

Kalamata: Counter-attackingMarko: Counter-attacking
KalamataMarko
Accuracy (shots on target)38%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.550.46
Finishing (goals per shot on target)2.041.05

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kalamata is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Kalamata · 1 pts / match - Marko

Kalamata
WWWLW
Season result split
85% W10% R5% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-2-1
2.65 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Marko
LLWDD
Season result split
45% W30% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kalamata is 114% better for: goals scored per match.

2.35 goals / match - Kalamata · 1.1 goals / match - Marko

Kalamata is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Kalamata · 0.7 goals / match - Marko

Kalamata scoring profile: very strong

Kalamata scores in 95% of matches (19 of 20 matches), while Marko keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

Marko scoring profile: strong

Marko scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

47Goals scored (season)22
KalamataMarko
12Goals conceded (season)14
KalamataMarko
2.95Average goals in match1.8
KalamataMarko
9Goals scored (last 5)2
KalamataMarko
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
KalamataMarko

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal75%
KalamataMarko
80%2 goals30%
KalamataMarko
35%3 goals5%
KalamataMarko
15%4 goals0%
KalamataMarko

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal55%
KalamataMarko
10%2 goals10%
KalamataMarko
0%3 goals5%
KalamataMarko
0%4 goals0%
KalamataMarko

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time5%
KalamataMarko
5%BTTS in both halves5%
KalamataMarko
55%Scored in both halves15%
KalamataMarko

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
KalamataMarko
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KalamataMarko
20%BTTS - last 520%
KalamataMarko

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
KalamataMarko
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
KalamataMarko
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
KalamataMarko

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
KalamataMarko
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
KalamataMarko
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
KalamataMarko

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kalamata is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.4 pts / match - Kalamata · 1.55 pts / match - Marko

Kalamata - half-time state
70% leading30% draw0% trailing
Marko - half-time state
35% leading50% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.4Points per match (1st half)1.55
KalamataMarko
1.15Goals scored (1st half)0.6
KalamataMarko
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
KalamataMarko
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.8
KalamataMarko
80%Clean sheet before half-time80%
KalamataMarko
25%No goal before half-time60%
KalamataMarko

After half-time (2nd half)

2.3Points per match (2nd half)1.25
KalamataMarko
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
KalamataMarko
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
KalamataMarko
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1
KalamataMarko
65%Clean sheet after half-time55%
KalamataMarko
25%No goal after half-time50%
KalamataMarko

Kalamata - second-half results

70% W20% R10% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Marko - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kalamata - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Marko - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.01.0
1 goal0%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kalamata
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
8
0
16-30
7
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Marko
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
6
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kalamata

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
188%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Marko

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

KalamataLigaMarko
Average goals in match 2.952.25 1.80
Both teams scored 45%38% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%38% 15%
Clean sheets 50%35% 45%
Goal before half-time 75%65% 55%
Goal after half-time 85%73% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Ahmad Mendes Moreira⚽ 1
José Antonio Miranda Boacho⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KalamataGoalJosé Antonio Miranda Boacho

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kalamata 2 - 0 - 0 Marko. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Marko
2 : 3
Kalamata
Kalamata
2 : 0
Marko

FAQ

What was the result of Kalamata vs Marko?

The Super League 2 match finished Kalamata 2:0 Marko. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kalamata and Marko?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kalamata won 2, Marko won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kalamata vs Marko?

Kalamata score 2.35 goals per game on average and Marko 1.10. The Super League 2 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Kalamata's matches and 35% of Marko's.

What form are Kalamata and Marko in?

Over the last 5 games Kalamata have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Marko 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kalamata vs Marko?

The statistical background for Kalamata vs Marko — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.