Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

Kalamata vs Panionios: match statistics

Kalamata crest
Kalamata
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Panionios crest
Panionios
165%(1.83)
X22%(3.00)
213%(4.10)

Kalamata is displaying impressive form as the league leaders with an undefeated record of 16 wins and 2 draws this season. The hosts are in particularly excellent form at home, winning 89% of their home matches and keeping clean sheets in 67% of games, with an average of just 0.33 goals conceded per match. Their run of five consecutive wins and a goal difference of 10 scored to only 1 conceded in the last five matches confirms their dominance. Panionios, despite a solid league position and a 67% away win rate, falls short of Kalamata in offensive terms (1.33 vs 2.56 goals per game) and has a lower conversion rate (14% vs 50%). The difference in goal difference (+20 for Kalamata at home vs +7 for Panionios away) and the hosts' undefeated streak speak in favor of their victory, although the experience and defensive solidity of the visitors offer a chance for a competitive match.

Kalamata vs Panionios: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kalamata played Panionios in Super League 2 (Greece). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kalamata: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Panionios: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kalamata scores 2.44 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. Panionios scores 1.41 and concedes 0.41. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kalamata 50%, Panionios 29%. Over 2.5: Kalamata 50%, Panionios 24%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Kalamata has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.41. Kalamata: 3.1 shots per match, Panionios: 4.5.

Match halves

Kalamata: half-time lead 72%, second-half goals 1.22. Panionios: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Kalamata: 76-90+ (10 goals). Panionios: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kalamata is displaying impressive form as the league leaders with an undefeated record of 16 wins and 2 draws this season. The hosts are in particularly excellent form at home, winning 89% of their home matches and keeping clean sheets in 67% of games, with an average of just 0.33 goals conceded per match. Their run of five consecutive wins and a goal difference of 10 scored to only 1 conceded in the last five matches confirms their dominance. Panionios, despite a solid league position and a 67% away win rate, falls short of Kalamata in offensive terms (1.33 vs 2.56 goals per game) and has a lower conversion rate (14% vs 50%). The difference in goal difference (+20 for Kalamata at home vs +7 for Panionios away) and the hosts' undefeated streak speak in favor of their victory, although the experience and defensive solidity of the visitors offer a chance for a competitive match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
KalamataPanionios
5Shots4
KalamataPanionios
3Shots on target2
KalamataPanionios
0.95xG0.71
KalamataPanionios
10Corners6
KalamataPanionios
58Dangerous attacks43
KalamataPanionios
-1Fouls-1
KalamataPanionios
-1Cards-1
KalamataPanionios

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.44Goals scored / match1.41
KalamataPanionios
0.56Goals conceded / match0.41
KalamataPanionios
20%Average possession25%
KalamataPanionios
1.17Shots on target / match1.12
KalamataPanionios

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.11Shots per match4.53
KalamataPanionios
1.17Shots on target1.12
KalamataPanionios
78.6%Shot conversion31.2%
KalamataPanionios
20%Possession25%
KalamataPanionios
1.78xG for1.41
KalamataPanionios
1.01xG against0.84
KalamataPanionios

Shooting quality

Kalamata: Counter-attackingPanionios: Counter-attacking
KalamataPanionios
Accuracy (shots on target)38%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.570.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)2.091.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kalamata is 50% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Kalamata · 2 pts / match - Panionios

Kalamata
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
89% W11% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-2-0
2.78 pts / match · goal difference +34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Panionios
WWLDW
Season result split
71% W24% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-1
2.35 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 0.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kalamata is 73% better for: goals scored per match.

2.44 goals / match - Kalamata · 1.41 goals / match - Panionios

Panionios is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.56 goals / match - Kalamata · 0.41 goals / match - Panionios

Kalamata scoring profile: strong

Kalamata scores in 100% of matches (18 of 18 matches), while Panionios keeps a clean sheet in 65% (11 of 17 matches).

Panionios scoring profile: strong

Panionios scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).

44Goals scored (season)24
KalamataPanionios
10Goals conceded (season)7
KalamataPanionios
3Average goals in match1.82
KalamataPanionios
10Goals scored (last 5)5
KalamataPanionios
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
KalamataPanionios

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal88%
KalamataPanionios
83%2 goals35%
KalamataPanionios
33%3 goals18%
KalamataPanionios
17%4 goals0%
KalamataPanionios

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal35%
KalamataPanionios
6%2 goals6%
KalamataPanionios
0%3 goals0%
KalamataPanionios
0%4 goals0%
KalamataPanionios

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time12%
KalamataPanionios
6%BTTS in both halves0%
KalamataPanionios
56%Scored in both halves24%
KalamataPanionios

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS12%
KalamataPanionios
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
KalamataPanionios
20%BTTS - last 50%
KalamataPanionios

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
KalamataPanionios
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
KalamataPanionios
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KalamataPanionios

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
KalamataPanionios
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KalamataPanionios
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KalamataPanionios

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kalamata is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.44 pts / match - Kalamata · 2.06 pts / match - Panionios

Kalamata - half-time state
72% leading28% draw0% trailing
Panionios - half-time state
53% leading47% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.44Points per match (1st half)2.06
KalamataPanionios
1.22Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KalamataPanionios
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.12
KalamataPanionios
1.44Average goals (1st half)0.82
KalamataPanionios
78%Clean sheet before half-time88%
KalamataPanionios
22%No goal before half-time35%
KalamataPanionios

After half-time (2nd half)

2.39Points per match (2nd half)1.53
KalamataPanionios
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
KalamataPanionios
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
KalamataPanionios
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1
KalamataPanionios
67%Clean sheet after half-time76%
KalamataPanionios
22%No goal after half-time53%
KalamataPanionios

Kalamata - second-half results

72% W22% R6% P
44
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 72% of matches and wins 89%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panionios - second-half results

29% W65% R6% P
35
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kalamata - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.203.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Panionios - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kalamata
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
7
0
16-30
7
3
31-45
7
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
10
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Panionios
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
5
0
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kalamata

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
191%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Panionios

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

KalamataLigaPanionios
Average goals in match 3.002.28 1.82
Both teams scored 50%39% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%38% 24%
Clean sheets 50%34% 65%
Goal before half-time 78%66% 65%
Goal after half-time 83%72% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Anastasios Kritikos⚽ 1
Giannis Kiakos⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PanioniosGoalAnastasios Kritikos
  2. PanioniosGoalGiannis Kiakos

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kalamata 1 - 1 - 0 Panionios. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Kalamata
2 : 0
Panionios
Panionios
1 : 1
Kalamata

FAQ

What was the result of Kalamata vs Panionios?

The Super League 2 match finished Kalamata 0:2 Panionios. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kalamata and Panionios?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kalamata won 1, Panionios won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kalamata vs Panionios?

Kalamata score 2.44 goals per game on average and Panionios 1.41. The Super League 2 average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kalamata's matches and 29% of Panionios's.

What form are Kalamata and Panionios in?

Over the last 5 games Kalamata have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Panionios 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kalamata vs Panionios?

The statistical background for Kalamata vs Panionios — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.