Kallithea vs Panargiakos: match statistics
Kallithea vs Panargiakos: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kallithea played Panargiakos in Super League 2 (Greece). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kallithea: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Panargiakos: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kallithea scores 1.16 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Panargiakos scores 0.40 and concedes 1.92. League average: 2.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kallithea 44%, Panargiakos 40%. Over 2.5: Kallithea 24%, Panargiakos 36%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Kallithea has higher xG: 1.71 vs 0.96. Kallithea: 6.5 shots per match, Panargiakos: 2.1.
Match halves
Kallithea: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.84. Panargiakos: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.12.
Goals by minute
Kallithea: 61-75 (10 goals). Panargiakos: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League 2: 2.20 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kallithea is the clear favorite: this season the hosts have 11 wins and 29 goals scored, while Panargiakos have 0 wins and only 10 goals. In the last 5 matches Kallithea recorded 3 wins and 2 draws (11 points, averaging 2.2 points per match), whereas Panargiakos has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (1 point, averaging 0.2 per match). The hosts create significantly more chances – at home they average 12.38 shots and 4.5 shots on target with xG 1.72, while the visitors away average 7.25 shots, 1.25 on target and xG 0.90 (xG difference +0.82 in favor of Kallithea). Defensively and in finishing the hosts also have the edge: Kallithea concede on average 1.00 goal at home and fail to score in only 8% of home matches, whereas Panargiakos concede 2.08 goals away and fail to score in 54% of away matches; shot conversion is roughly 8% vs 3%. Based on the xG advantage, higher number of shots on target and clearly superior form, I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS (Both Teams To Score) at 28% and No BTTS at 72% — the “No” scenario is more likely. Seasonal indicators show weak offensive efficiency: Kallithea averages 0.33 goals per game, Panargiakos 0.46, with seasonal BTTS rates of 33% for hosts and 46% for visitors; league BTTS level is only 38%. Last-5 form strongly favors No BTTS on the visitors’ side — Kallithea scores 1.4 and concedes 0.6 per game over the last 5, while Panargiakos records 0.4 scored and 1.6 conceded. Additionally, Panargiakos has only 10 goals scored and 48 conceded this season, with 1.25 shots on target per game and a 3% conversion rate, which markedly reduces their probability of scoring against Kallithea (29 goals this season and 3.0 shots on target). This is supported by last-5 xG: 1.77 xG for Kallithea versus 0.74 xG for Panargiakos, indicating a home advantage in creating quality chances and higher likelihood of a one-sided scoring outcome (No BTTS / clean sheet expected).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals at ~2.65 (1.40 for Kallithea and 1.25 for Panargiakos), calculated as the mean of attack xG and opponent xG: (1.01+1.79)/2=1.40 and (0.90+1.60)/2=1.25. A Poisson model with lambda=2.65 yields P(0)=0.071, P(1)=0.187, so the probability of over 1.5 goals is ~74% (1 - P(0) - P(1)=0.742), over 2.5 is ~50% and over 3.5 ~28%. Additionally, Kallithea scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 1.4) and has a recent attack xG of 1.77, while Panargiakos has 2 goals in the last 5 (0.4) and attack xG 0.74, reinforcing the home side’s offensive advantage. Seasonally both teams show high over 1.5 rates (Kallithea 67% and Panargiakos 69%), but lower over 2.5 (33% and 38%) and over 3.5 (17% and 31%), which explains greater confidence in over 1.5 than in higher lines. Based on this, the best pick is Over 1.5 (side: Over, line: 1.5), since form signals (home 1.77 xG in last 5, 7 goals in L5) and the away defense weakness (48 losses/turnovers this season, 2.08 avg) give the strongest edge for this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1). Data show that a deadlock at the break is common — Panargiakos were level at the break in 62% of matches, while Kallithea were level at the break in 100% of their last five fixtures. After half-time Kallithea perform better: in their last five matches they averaged 1.0 goals after the break versus Panargiakos’ 0.4, and collected an average of 2.2 points after half-time compared to 1.2 for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts generate more opportunities (xG 1.01 vs 0.90 and 3.0 shots on target per game vs 1.25), which increases the likelihood that after a draw in the first period it will be Kallithea who turns the result in their favor, despite the hosts historically being behind at the break in 67% of matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kallithea | Panargiakos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 15% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.52 | 1.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kallithea is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Kallithea · 0.2 pts / match - Panargiakos
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kallithea is 190% better for: goals scored per match.
1.16 goals / match - Kallithea · 0.4 goals / match - Panargiakos
Kallithea is 129% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.84 goals / match - Kallithea · 1.92 goals / match - Panargiakos
Kallithea scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Panargiakos keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Panargiakos scores in 40% of matches (10 of 25 matches), while Kallithea keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kallithea
Over / Under - Panargiakos
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kallithea is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Kallithea · 0.6 pts / match - Panargiakos
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kallithea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Panargiakos - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kallithea
Panargiakos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).
Teams vs league
| Kallithea | Liga | Panargiakos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.20 | ▲ 2.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 38% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | • 36% | 35% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KallitheaGoalHugo José Rama Calviño
- PanargiakosGoalBrahim Bruno Kone
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Kallithea 2 - 1 - 0 Panargiakos. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kallithea vs Panargiakos?
The Super League 2 match finished Kallithea 1:1 Panargiakos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kallithea and Panargiakos?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kallithea won 2, Panargiakos won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kallithea vs Panargiakos?
Kallithea score 1.16 goals per game on average and Panargiakos 0.40. The Super League 2 average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Kallithea's matches and 40% of Panargiakos's.
What form are Kallithea and Panargiakos in?
Over the last 5 games Kallithea have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Panargiakos 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kallithea vs Panargiakos?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


