Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Kano Pillars vs Barau: match statistics

Kano Pillars crest
Kano Pillars
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Barau crest
Barau
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Kano Pillars display a clear advantage as the home team, securing 64% of wins in home matches with only 14% losses. The hosts boast a positive goal difference of +10 at home, averaging 1.29 goals scored and conceding only 0.57 goals per match. Barau, however, performs very poorly away from home - with a mere 7% win rate, a staggering 86% of matches without a goal scored, and an average of just 0.29 goals scored on the road. Kano Pillars' superiority is further highlighted by the xG statistics (2.25 vs 1.01) and ball possession (59% vs 45%). Barau's away goal difference stands at -11, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (50% clean sheets), makes a Kano Pillars victory highly probable.

Kano Pillars vs Barau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kano Pillars play Barau in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 8 March 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kano Pillars: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Barau: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kano Pillars scores 0.97 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Barau scores 0.89 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kano Pillars 34%, Barau 29%. Over 2.5: Kano Pillars 37%, Barau 26%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Kano Pillars has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.30. Kano Pillars: 2.7 shots per match, Barau: 4.7.

Match halves

Kano Pillars: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. Barau: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Kano Pillars: 31-45+ (10 goals). Barau: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Kano Pillars display a clear advantage as the home team, securing 64% of wins in home matches with only 14% losses. The hosts boast a positive goal difference of +10 at home, averaging 1.29 goals scored and conceding only 0.57 goals per match. Barau, however, performs very poorly away from home - with a mere 7% win rate, a staggering 86% of matches without a goal scored, and an average of just 0.29 goals scored on the road. Kano Pillars' superiority is further highlighted by the xG statistics (2.25 vs 1.01) and ball possession (59% vs 45%). Barau's away goal difference stands at -11, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (50% clean sheets), makes a Kano Pillars victory highly probable.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Kano PillarsBarau
-1Shots-1
Kano PillarsBarau
-1Shots on target-1
Kano PillarsBarau
0xG0
Kano PillarsBarau
-1Corners-1
Kano PillarsBarau
0Dangerous attacks0
Kano PillarsBarau
-1Fouls-1
Kano PillarsBarau
-1Cards-1
Kano PillarsBarau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.97Goals scored / match0.89
Kano PillarsBarau
1.03Goals conceded / match0.79
Kano PillarsBarau
16%Average possession23%
Kano PillarsBarau
0.37Shots on target / match0.97
Kano PillarsBarau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.68Shots per match4.74
Kano PillarsBarau
0.37Shots on target0.97
Kano PillarsBarau
36.3%Shot conversion18.9%
Kano PillarsBarau
16%Possession23%
Kano PillarsBarau
1.32xG for1.3
Kano PillarsBarau
1.45xG against1.31
Kano PillarsBarau

Shooting quality

Kano Pillars: Counter-attackingBarau: Counter-attacking
Kano PillarsBarau
Accuracy (shots on target)14%20%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.490.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)2.620.92

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Barau is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kano Pillars · 1.8 pts / match - Barau

Kano Pillars
LWLWL
Season result split
39% W16% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-17
1.34 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-3-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Barau
WLWLW
Season result split
34% W34% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-13-12
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-10
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kano Pillars is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Kano Pillars · 0.89 goals / match - Barau

Barau is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Kano Pillars · 0.79 goals / match - Barau

Kano Pillars scoring profile: mixed

Kano Pillars scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Barau keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).

Barau scoring profile: mixed

Barau scores in 45% of matches (17 of 38 matches), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

37Goals scored (season)34
Kano PillarsBarau
39Goals conceded (season)30
Kano PillarsBarau
2Average goals in match1.68
Kano PillarsBarau
4Goals scored (last 5)9
Kano PillarsBarau
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Kano PillarsBarau

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal45%
Kano PillarsBarau
24%2 goals29%
Kano PillarsBarau
8%3 goals13%
Kano PillarsBarau
3%4 goals3%
Kano PillarsBarau

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal58%
Kano PillarsBarau
29%2 goals21%
Kano PillarsBarau
8%3 goals0%
Kano PillarsBarau
3%4 goals0%
Kano PillarsBarau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time16%
Kano PillarsBarau
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Kano PillarsBarau
11%Scored in both halves21%
Kano PillarsBarau

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Kano PillarsBarau
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Kano PillarsBarau
40%BTTS - last 540%
Kano PillarsBarau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Kano PillarsBarau
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Kano PillarsBarau
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Kano PillarsBarau

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
Kano PillarsBarau
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Kano PillarsBarau
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Kano PillarsBarau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kano Pillars is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.34 pts / match - Kano Pillars · 1.18 pts / match - Barau

Kano Pillars - half-time state
29% leading47% draw24% trailing
Barau - half-time state
21% leading55% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.34Points per match (1st half)1.18
Kano PillarsBarau
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Kano PillarsBarau
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Kano PillarsBarau
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.84
Kano PillarsBarau
63%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Kano PillarsBarau
66%No goal before half-time68%
Kano PillarsBarau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Kano PillarsBarau
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Kano PillarsBarau
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
Kano PillarsBarau
1.11Average goals (2nd half)0.84
Kano PillarsBarau
58%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Kano PillarsBarau
61%No goal after half-time66%
Kano PillarsBarau

Kano Pillars - second-half results

29% W34% R37% P
51
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Barau - second-half results

29% W53% R18% P
45
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kano Pillars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Barau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kano Pillars
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
10
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Barau
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
5
3
16-30
9
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
11
6
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kano Pillars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Barau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Kano PillarsLigaBarau
Average goals in match 2.002.02 1.68
Both teams scored 34%38% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%34% 26%
Clean sheets 37%37% 42%
Goal before half-time 58%61% 55%
Goal after half-time 68%64% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kano Pillars 0 - 0 - 1 Barau. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Barau
2 : 1
Kano Pillars

FAQ

What was the result of Kano Pillars vs Barau?

The NPFL match finished Kano Pillars 1:0 Barau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kano Pillars vs Barau?

Kano Pillars score 0.97 goals per game on average and Barau 0.89. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Kano Pillars's matches and 29% of Barau's.

What form are Kano Pillars and Barau in?

Over the last 5 games Kano Pillars have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Barau 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kano Pillars vs Barau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.