KäPa vs JIPPO: match statistics
KäPa vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KäPa played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
KäPa: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. JIPPO: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
KäPa scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. JIPPO scores 0.75 and concedes 0.25. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KäPa 75%, JIPPO 25%. Over 2.5: KäPa 75%, JIPPO 25%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
JIPPO has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.16. KäPa: 8.3 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.3.
Match halves
KäPa: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.25. JIPPO: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
KäPa: 0-15 (3 goals). JIPPO: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JIPPO has a clear advantage in chance creation — on the road they average 16 shots and xG 1.56, while KäPa at home average only 5 shots and xG 0.96, which indicates more and higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Defensively the visitors look better in terms of goals conceded: JIPPO concedes on average 1 goal away, while KäPa concedes 2 goals at home; although xG against is 1.34 for JIPPO versus 1.10 for KäPa, the actual goals conceded (1 vs 2) favor the visitors’ defensive effectiveness. In the last 5 matches KäPa have scored 11 goals and average 2.2 points per game, compared to 4 goals and 1.6 points per game for JIPPO, which shows stronger recent offensive form for the home side but also greater instability (KäPa conceded 7 goals in that period vs 3 for the visitors). Finishing efficiency also favors KäPa (40% conversion at home versus 13% for JIPPO), however it comes from a smaller sample of shots and may be hard to sustain. Considering the higher volume and quality of the visitors’ chances (16 shots and xG 1.56) and JIPPO’s lower average goals conceded (1 vs 2), I predict a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes. JIPPO averages 2.0 goals per game and has 100% BTTS in away matches, with a season xG_for of 1.56. KäPa has only 0.33 goals per game this season and officially 100% seasonCS at home (seasonCS 100% and seasonBTTS_home 0%), but in the last 5 games KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and had BTTS in 80% of those matches, indicating a form shift. Chance levels are supported by xG – both teams have season xG_for of 1.56, and in the last 5 matches KäPa’s xG was 1.26 vs JIPPO’s 1.39. KäPa averages 4.33 shots on target per game vs 2.0 for JIPPO, but JIPPO is more efficient with a 13% conversion rate vs 3%, so the visitors are more clinical. The counterargument is the league’s low BTTS rate (32%) and high clean sheet percentage (84%), which lowers the overall BTTS probability for this fixture. Considering JIPPO’s 100% away BTTS, KäPa’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, and matched xG of 1.56–1.56, I estimate BTTS probability at ~60% vs 40% and recommend "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A combined xG model gives expected goals of 1.45 for KäPa and 1.21 for JIPPO, totaling 2.66 goals. Both teams have average attacking xG of 1.56, but the home defense concedes 0.85 xG against versus 1.34 for the visitors, suggesting KäPa will create more chances against JIPPO’s weaker backline. In the last 5 matches KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and JIPPO 4 goals (0.8 per game); hosts average 12.33 shots with 4.33 on target, while guests register 16 shots but only 2 on target and a higher conversion rate 13% vs 3%, which increases unpredictability but does not lower the total goals projection. Additionally, in the hosts’ last 5 matches the share of games over 2.5 goals is 80%, and the league average is 2.05 goals per game, so the expected 2.66 is well above the 1.5 threshold and slightly above 2.5. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with a high probability; Over 2.5 is moderately likely, and Over 3.5 has a low chance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last five matches the home team led at the break in 5 of 5 (100%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.0, which strongly supports a home lead at the break. Over the season the hosts concede no goals (0.0 conceded per match on average) and have 100% clean sheets, whereas the visitors score 2.0 goals per match on average but 0.0 by half-time, suggesting the visitors’ goals predominantly occur after the break. Both teams’ xG are similar at 1.56 (1.56 vs 1.56), however the home side has a lower xG against of 0.85 compared to 1.34 for the visitors, giving the hosts a defensive edge and increasing the likelihood of maintaining the lead. In light of these figures (100% leads at half-time in the last five, 100% seasonal clean sheets and the hosts’ 67% season full-match win rate) the strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario, therefore it receives the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KäPa | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KäPa is 133% better for: goals scored per match.
1.75 goals / match - KäPa · 0.75 goals / match - JIPPO
JIPPO is 400% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - KäPa · 0.25 goals / match - JIPPO
KäPa scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 matches).
JIPPO scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KäPa
Over / Under - JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KäPa is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / match - KäPa · 0.75 pts / match - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JIPPO - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 0.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 25% |
| No goal | 0% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.75 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KäPa
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KäPa | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 1.95 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 36% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): KäPa 0 - 1 - 2 JIPPO. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KäPa vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and JIPPO?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs JIPPO?
KäPa score 1.75 goals per game on average and JIPPO 0.75. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 75% of KäPa's matches and 25% of JIPPO's.
What form are KäPa and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs JIPPO?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


