Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

KäPa vs JIPPO: match statistics

KäPa crest
KäPa
0 : 2half-time 0:2
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

KäPa vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

KäPa: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. JIPPO: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. JIPPO scores 0.75 and concedes 0.25. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 75%, JIPPO 25%. Over 2.5: KäPa 75%, JIPPO 25%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.16. KäPa: 8.3 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.3.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.25. JIPPO: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 0-15 (3 goals). JIPPO: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JIPPO has a clear advantage in chance creation — on the road they average 16 shots and xG 1.56, while KäPa at home average only 5 shots and xG 0.96, which indicates more and higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Defensively the visitors look better in terms of goals conceded: JIPPO concedes on average 1 goal away, while KäPa concedes 2 goals at home; although xG against is 1.34 for JIPPO versus 1.10 for KäPa, the actual goals conceded (1 vs 2) favor the visitors’ defensive effectiveness. In the last 5 matches KäPa have scored 11 goals and average 2.2 points per game, compared to 4 goals and 1.6 points per game for JIPPO, which shows stronger recent offensive form for the home side but also greater instability (KäPa conceded 7 goals in that period vs 3 for the visitors). Finishing efficiency also favors KäPa (40% conversion at home versus 13% for JIPPO), however it comes from a smaller sample of shots and may be hard to sustain. Considering the higher volume and quality of the visitors’ chances (16 shots and xG 1.56) and JIPPO’s lower average goals conceded (1 vs 2), I predict a win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes. JIPPO averages 2.0 goals per game and has 100% BTTS in away matches, with a season xG_for of 1.56. KäPa has only 0.33 goals per game this season and officially 100% seasonCS at home (seasonCS 100% and seasonBTTS_home 0%), but in the last 5 games KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and had BTTS in 80% of those matches, indicating a form shift. Chance levels are supported by xG – both teams have season xG_for of 1.56, and in the last 5 matches KäPa’s xG was 1.26 vs JIPPO’s 1.39. KäPa averages 4.33 shots on target per game vs 2.0 for JIPPO, but JIPPO is more efficient with a 13% conversion rate vs 3%, so the visitors are more clinical. The counterargument is the league’s low BTTS rate (32%) and high clean sheet percentage (84%), which lowers the overall BTTS probability for this fixture. Considering JIPPO’s 100% away BTTS, KäPa’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, and matched xG of 1.56–1.56, I estimate BTTS probability at ~60% vs 40% and recommend "yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A combined xG model gives expected goals of 1.45 for KäPa and 1.21 for JIPPO, totaling 2.66 goals. Both teams have average attacking xG of 1.56, but the home defense concedes 0.85 xG against versus 1.34 for the visitors, suggesting KäPa will create more chances against JIPPO’s weaker backline. In the last 5 matches KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and JIPPO 4 goals (0.8 per game); hosts average 12.33 shots with 4.33 on target, while guests register 16 shots but only 2 on target and a higher conversion rate 13% vs 3%, which increases unpredictability but does not lower the total goals projection. Additionally, in the hosts’ last 5 matches the share of games over 2.5 goals is 80%, and the league average is 2.05 goals per game, so the expected 2.66 is well above the 1.5 threshold and slightly above 2.5. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with a high probability; Over 2.5 is moderately likely, and Over 3.5 has a low chance.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last five matches the home team led at the break in 5 of 5 (100%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.0, which strongly supports a home lead at the break. Over the season the hosts concede no goals (0.0 conceded per match on average) and have 100% clean sheets, whereas the visitors score 2.0 goals per match on average but 0.0 by half-time, suggesting the visitors’ goals predominantly occur after the break. Both teams’ xG are similar at 1.56 (1.56 vs 1.56), however the home side has a lower xG against of 0.85 compared to 1.34 for the visitors, giving the hosts a defensive edge and increasing the likelihood of maintaining the lead. In light of these figures (100% leads at half-time in the last five, 100% seasonal clean sheets and the hosts’ 67% season full-match win rate) the strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario, therefore it receives the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KäPaJIPPO
14Shots13
KäPaJIPPO
3Shots on target4
KäPaJIPPO
1.46xG1.5
KäPaJIPPO
9Corners8
KäPaJIPPO
51Dangerous attacks56
KäPaJIPPO
1Fouls1
KäPaJIPPO
3Cards3
KäPaJIPPO

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match0.75
KäPaJIPPO
1.25Goals conceded / match0.25
KäPaJIPPO
45%Average possession56%
KäPaJIPPO
3.5Shots on target / match3.75
KäPaJIPPO

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.25Shots per match13.25
KäPaJIPPO
3.5Shots on target3.75
KäPaJIPPO
21.2%Shot conversion5.7%
KäPaJIPPO
45%Possession56%
KäPaJIPPO
1.16xG for1.57
KäPaJIPPO
1.35xG against0.97
KäPaJIPPO

Shooting quality

KäPa: Counter-attackingJIPPO: Balanced
KäPaJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)42%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KäPa
WDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%
JIPPO
DWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 133% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - KäPa · 0.75 goals / match - JIPPO

JIPPO is 400% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - KäPa · 0.25 goals / match - JIPPO

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 matches).

JIPPO scoring profile: strong

JIPPO scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)3
KäPaJIPPO
5Goals conceded (season)1
KäPaJIPPO
3Average goals in match1
KäPaJIPPO
7Goals scored (last 5)3
KäPaJIPPO
5Goals conceded (last 5)1
KäPaJIPPO

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
KäPaJIPPO
75%2 goals25%
KäPaJIPPO
0%3 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal25%
KäPaJIPPO
50%2 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO
0%3 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
KäPaJIPPO
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KäPaJIPPO
25%Scored in both halves0%
KäPaJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
KäPaJIPPO
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KäPaJIPPO
75%BTTS - last 525%
KäPaJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
KäPaJIPPO
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KäPaJIPPO
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KäPaJIPPO

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
KäPaJIPPO
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
KäPaJIPPO
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KäPaJIPPO

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - KäPa · 0.75 pts / match - JIPPO

KäPa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)0.75
KäPaJIPPO
1.5Goals scored (1st half)0
KäPaJIPPO
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
KäPaJIPPO
1.5Average goals (1st half)0.25
KäPaJIPPO
100%Clean sheet before half-time75%
KäPaJIPPO
0%No goal before half-time100%
KäPaJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

0.25Points per match (2nd half)2
KäPaJIPPO
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
KäPaJIPPO
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0
KäPaJIPPO
1.5Average goals (2nd half)0.75
KäPaJIPPO
25%Clean sheet after half-time100%
KäPaJIPPO
75%No goal after half-time50%
KäPaJIPPO

KäPa - second-half results

0% W25% R75% P
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JIPPO - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.25
Goals scored / match1.50.3
Goals conceded / match0.01.3
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal100%75%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet100%25%
No goal0%75%
Goal difference+6-4
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.752.00
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.30.0
Average goals in match0.30.8
1 goal25%50%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet75%100%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
171%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 43% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.82
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
20%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaJIPPO
Average goals in match 3.001.95 1.00
Both teams scored 75%32% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%36% 25%
Clean sheets 25%41% 75%
Goal before half-time 100%64% 25%
Goal after half-time 75%55% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.73
Away goals / match
+68%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JIPPOYellow cardNuutti Tykkyläinen
  2. KäPaYellow cardSameli Puputti
  3. KäPaYellow cardNiko Nurmi
  4. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Mikko KuningasOff: Reko Huhtamäki
  5. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Aleksi TarvonenOff: Jyri Kiuru
  6. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Pontus LindbergOff: Sameli Puputti
  7. JIPPOYellow cardVictor de Paula
  8. KäPaYellow cardMikko Kuningas
  9. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Miro TurunenOff: Eemeli Honkola
  10. JIPPOYellow cardMiro Turunen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): KäPa 0 - 1 - 2 JIPPO. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

JIPPO Joensuu
2 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
JIPPO Joensuu
3 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of KäPa vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and JIPPO?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs JIPPO?

KäPa score 1.75 goals per game on average and JIPPO 0.75. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 75% of KäPa's matches and 25% of JIPPO's.

What form are KäPa and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs JIPPO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.