Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 22 October 2026

KäPa vs PK-35: match statistics

KäPa crest
KäPa
1 : 4half-time 1:3
PK-35 crest
PK-35

KäPa vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

KäPa: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. PK-35: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.05 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.68 and concedes 0.64. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 64%, PK-35 36%. Over 2.5: KäPa 68%, PK-35 45%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.35. KäPa: 10.9 shots per match, PK-35: 11.9.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55. PK-35: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 61-75 (6 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 sit 2nd, while KäPa are only ninth, and the away side’s season record stands at 13 wins and just 3 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 12 losses. Recent form also strongly favors PK-35: over their last five matches, they have collected 11 points, scored 10 goals and conceded just 1, whereas KäPa have lost 4 of their last 5 games, scoring only 3 goals. Away from home, PK-35 win 80% of their matches, average 1.8 goals and keep a clean sheet in 90% of games, conceding just 0.1 goals per match. KäPa average 1.1 goals at home, fail to score in 40% of matches and concede 1.6 goals, so the visitors’ highly solid defense should restrict their attacking opportunities. Although both teams average 1.43 xG, PK-35 are far more clinical, converting 16% of their shots into goals compared with KäPa’s 9%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from PK-35’s defense, which keeps a clean sheet in 90% of matches and concedes just 0.10 goals per game on average. KäPa have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6, while recording four defeats and one draw during that period. PK-35 are also in excellent defensive form: they have conceded just 1 goal in their last five appearances while scoring 10. Although KäPa have a season BTTS rate of 67%, PK-35 have had such matches in 0% of their games this season and just 20% of their last five, significantly reducing the likelihood of both teams scoring. PK-35 should create chances even against a KäPa defense conceding an average of 1.08 goals, but the more likely scenario is that the hosts fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

PK-35 have very strong defensive foundations: they have conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, while averaging only 0.10 goals conceded per away game this season and keeping a clean sheet in 90% of matches. KäPa are in poor offensive form, having scored 3 goals in their last five appearances—just 0.6 per match—while going through a run of four defeats and one draw. The visitors should create chances, having recently averaged 2.0 goals and an xG of 1.60, but their defensive strength limits the likelihood of an open game from both sides. The combined expected total of 2.20 goals, along with PK-35’s historical results, in which 90% of matches ended with a maximum of three goals, clearly support Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 have been clearly stronger throughout the season: they have won 80% of their matches and average 2.5 points per game, while KäPa have a 42% win rate and average 1.67 points. The visitors’ defensive record is the key factor, as they concede just 0.1 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 90% of their appearances, compared with the hosts’ average of 1.08 goals conceded. Recent form further strengthens the away scenario: KäPa have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring just 0.6 goals per game in that run, while PK-35 remain unbeaten and average 2.0 goals. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their last five matches, scoring 1.4 goals per game before half-time and conceding none, whereas KäPa managed just 0.2 goals during that period. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT scenario in which PK-35 take the lead before half-time and, thanks to their highly resolute defence, hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
KäPaPK-35
5Shots13
KäPaPK-35
5Shots on target6
KäPaPK-35
1.02xG1.66
KäPaPK-35
5Corners7
KäPaPK-35
48Dangerous attacks58
KäPaPK-35
12Fouls9
KäPaPK-35
1Cards2
KäPaPK-35

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.05Goals scored / match1.68
KäPaPK-35
1.68Goals conceded / match0.64
KäPaPK-35
49%Average possession44%
KäPaPK-35
3.55Shots on target / match4.18
KäPaPK-35

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.86Shots per match11.86
KäPaPK-35
3.55Shots on target4.18
KäPaPK-35
9.6%Shot conversion14.2%
KäPaPK-35
49%Possession44%
KäPaPK-35
1.35xG for1.47
KäPaPK-35
1.64xG against1.35
KäPaPK-35

Shooting quality

KäPa: BalancedPK-35: Counter-attacking
KäPaPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - KäPa · 2.2 pts / match - PK-35

KäPa
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W27% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-12
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PK-35
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W27% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-3
2.05 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-1-1
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - KäPa · 1.68 goals / match - PK-35

PK-35 is 163% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - KäPa · 0.64 goals / match - PK-35

KäPa scoring profile: mixed

KäPa scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).

PK-35 scoring profile: very strong

PK-35 scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

23Goals scored (season)37
KäPaPK-35
37Goals conceded (season)14
KäPaPK-35
2.73Average goals in match2.32
KäPaPK-35
4Goals scored (last 5)10
KäPaPK-35
8Goals conceded (last 5)1
KäPaPK-35

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal77%
KäPaPK-35
32%2 goals41%
KäPaPK-35
5%3 goals36%
KäPaPK-35
0%4 goals9%
KäPaPK-35

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal45%
KäPaPK-35
64%2 goals9%
KäPaPK-35
18%3 goals5%
KäPaPK-35
0%4 goals5%
KäPaPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time9%
KäPaPK-35
0%BTTS in both halves5%
KäPaPK-35
14%Scored in both halves27%
KäPaPK-35

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
KäPaPK-35
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
KäPaPK-35
60%BTTS - last 520%
KäPaPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
KäPaPK-35
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
KäPaPK-35
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
KäPaPK-35

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
KäPaPK-35
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
KäPaPK-35
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
KäPaPK-35

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - KäPa · 1.59 pts / match - PK-35

KäPa - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.59
KäPaPK-35
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.68
KäPaPK-35
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
KäPaPK-35
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.95
KäPaPK-35
55%Clean sheet before half-time77%
KäPaPK-35
59%No goal before half-time59%
KäPaPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.82
KäPaPK-35
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)1
KäPaPK-35
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
KäPaPK-35
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.36
KäPaPK-35
36%Clean sheet after half-time68%
KäPaPK-35
59%No goal after half-time36%
KäPaPK-35

KäPa - second-half results

9% W45% D45% L
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PK-35 - second-half results

45% W45% D9% L
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding164%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+7+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
7
31-45
5
4
46-60
6
3
61-75
1
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
10
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaPK-35
Average goals in match▲ 2.732.54▼ 2.32
Both teams scored▲ 64%43%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 68%46%• 45%
Clean sheets▼ 14%32%▲ 55%
Goal before half-time▲ 68%64%▼ 55%
Goal after half-time• 73%72%▼ 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KäPaYellow cardDaniel Ripatti
  2. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Emu KawakitaOff: Eino-Iivari Pitkälä
  3. PK-35Yellow cardMaximo Tolonen
  4. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Excel-Stanis MuseteOff: Shunta Uchiyama
  5. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Chris MalinenOff: Daniel Ripatti

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): KäPa 0 - 3 - 2 PK-35. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

PK-35
3 : 1
KäPa
KäPa
0 : 0
PK-35
Pallokerho-35 ry
1 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 1
Pallokerho-35 ry
Pallokerho-35 ry
4 : 0
Käpylän Pallo

FAQ

What was the result of KäPa vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 1:4 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and PK-35?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs PK-35?

KäPa score 1.05 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.68. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 64% of KäPa's matches and 36% of PK-35's.

What form are KäPa and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and PK-35 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs PK-35?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KäPa vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.