Kapaz vs Qabala: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kapaz played Qabala in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 14 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kapaz: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Qabala: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kapaz scores 0.71 and concedes 2.64 goals per match. Qabala scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kapaz 36%, Qabala 38%. Over 2.5: Kapaz 71%, Qabala 38%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Kapaz has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.13. Kapaz: 10.4 shots per match, Qabala: 9.5.

Match halves

Kapaz: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.43. Qabala: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Kapaz: 76-90+ (5 goals). Qabala: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
KapazQabala
13Shots7
KapazQabala
3Shots on target1
KapazQabala
1.42xG0.73
KapazQabala
8Corners2
KapazQabala
54Dangerous attacks29
KapazQabala
9Fouls12
KapazQabala
4Cards3
KapazQabala

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.71Goals scored / match0.77
KapazQabala
2.64Goals conceded / match1.38
KapazQabala
45%Average possession47%
KapazQabala
2.79Shots on target / match3
KapazQabala

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.43Shots per match9.46
KapazQabala
2.79Shots on target3
KapazQabala
6.8%Shot conversion8.1%
KapazQabala
45%Possession47%
KapazQabala
1.22xG for1.13
KapazQabala
1.55xG against1.49
KapazQabala

Shooting quality

Kapaz: BalancedQabala: Balanced
KapazQabala
Accuracy (shots on target)27%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kapaz
LLWLL
Season result split
14% W0% R86% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-12
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-5
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Qabala
LLLLW
Season result split
15% W15% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-9
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Qabala is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Kapaz · 0.77 goals / match - Qabala

Qabala is 91% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.64 goals / match - Kapaz · 1.38 goals / match - Qabala

Kapaz scoring profile: strong

Kapaz scores in 36% of matches (5 of 14 matches), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

Qabala scoring profile: very strong

Qabala scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Kapaz keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 14 matches).

10Goals scored (season)10
KapazQabala
37Goals conceded (season)18
KapazQabala
3.36Average goals in match2.15
KapazQabala
4Goals scored (last 5)2
KapazQabala
13Goals conceded (last 5)7
KapazQabala

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal46%
KapazQabala
21%2 goals23%
KapazQabala
7%3 goals8%
KapazQabala
7%4 goals0%
KapazQabala

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal92%
KapazQabala
79%2 goals46%
KapazQabala
57%3 goals0%
KapazQabala
14%4 goals0%
KapazQabala

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time23%
KapazQabala
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KapazQabala
14%Scored in both halves23%
KapazQabala

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
KapazQabala
36%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
KapazQabala
60%BTTS - last 520%
KapazQabala

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
KapazQabala
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
KapazQabala
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
KapazQabala

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
KapazQabala
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KapazQabala
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KapazQabala

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Qabala is 98% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.43 pts / match - Kapaz · 0.85 pts / match - Qabala

Kapaz - half-time state
7% leading21% draw71% trailing
Qabala - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.43Points per match (1st half)0.85
KapazQabala
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.38
KapazQabala
1.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
KapazQabala
1.64Average goals (1st half)1.08
KapazQabala
14%Clean sheet before half-time46%
KapazQabala
79%No goal before half-time62%
KapazQabala

After half-time (2nd half)

0.64Points per match (2nd half)0.92
KapazQabala
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
KapazQabala
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
KapazQabala
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.08
KapazQabala
29%Clean sheet after half-time54%
KapazQabala
71%No goal after half-time69%
KapazQabala

Kapaz - second-half results

14% W21% R64% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Qabala - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kapaz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qabala - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kapaz
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
0
5
16-30
3
11
31-45
0
5
46-60
1
6
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Qabala
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
35%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kapaz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
213%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Qabala

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

KapazLigaQabala
Average goals in match 3.362.48 2.15
Both teams scored 36%44% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%46% 38%
Clean sheets 0%32% 8%
Goal before half-time 86%63% 69%
Goal after half-time 86%76% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KapazYellow cardOlawale Onanuga
  2. QabalaRed cardIbrahim Sangaré
  3. KapazSubstitutionOn: Luiz Henrique Pachu LiraOff: Rauf Hüseynli
  4. QabalaSubstitutionOn: Eshgin AhmadovOff: Nugay Rashidov
  5. KapazYellow cardLuiz Henrique Pachu Lira
  6. QabalaYellow cardJaime Sierra Mateos
  7. KapazYellow cardŞakir Seyidov
  8. KapazSubstitutionOn: Əli SəmədovOff: Olawale Onanuga
  9. KapazYellow cardƏli Səmədov
  10. KapazSubstitutionOn: Ümid SəmədovOff: Fərid Nəbiyev
  11. QabalaSubstitutionOn: Elşad TağıyevOff: Domi Jaurès Massoumou

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kapaz 0 - 0 - 1 Qabala. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Qabala
3 : 0
FK Kapaz

FAQ

What was the result of Kapaz vs Qabala?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Kapaz 1:0 Qabala. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kapaz vs Qabala?

Kapaz score 0.71 goals per game on average and Qabala 0.77. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Kapaz's matches and 38% of Qabala's.

What form are Kapaz and Qabala in?

Over the last 5 games Kapaz have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Qabala 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kapaz vs Qabala?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kapaz vs Qabala: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.