Kapaz vs Zira: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kapaz played Zira in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 28 November 2025. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kapaz: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Zira: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kapaz scores 0.83 and concedes 2.75 goals per match. Zira scores 1.58 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kapaz 42%, Zira 58%. Over 2.5: Kapaz 83%, Zira 50%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.27. Kapaz: 10.8 shots per match, Zira: 11.7.

Match halves

Kapaz: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.50. Zira: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Kapaz: 76-90+ (5 goals). Zira: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
KapazZira
5Shots8
KapazZira
1Shots on target4
KapazZira
0.66xG1.09
KapazZira
2Corners2
KapazZira
36Dangerous attacks40
KapazZira
20Fouls13
KapazZira
1Cards1
KapazZira

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match1.58
KapazZira
2.75Goals conceded / match1
KapazZira
46%Average possession61%
KapazZira
3.08Shots on target / match4.83
KapazZira

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.83Shots per match11.67
KapazZira
3.08Shots on target4.83
KapazZira
7.7%Shot conversion13.6%
KapazZira
46%Possession61%
KapazZira
1.27xG for1.5
KapazZira
1.53xG against1.09
KapazZira

Shooting quality

Kapaz: BalancedZira: Efficient finishing
KapazZira
Accuracy (shots on target)28%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kapaz · 2 pts / match - Zira

Kapaz
WLLLW
Season result split
17% W0% D83% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-10
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 at home
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Zira
LWWDW
Season result split
50% W42% D8% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-1
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 90% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Kapaz · 1.58 goals / match - Zira

Zira is 175% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.75 goals / match - Kapaz · 1 goals / match - Zira

Kapaz scoring profile: mixed

Kapaz scores in 42% of matches (5 of 12 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Kapaz keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).

10Goals scored (season)19
KapazZira
33Goals conceded (season)12
KapazZira
3.58Average goals in match2.58
KapazZira
8Goals scored (last 5)5
KapazZira
13Goals conceded (last 5)5
KapazZira

How often they score at least...

42%1 goal83%
KapazZira
25%2 goals42%
KapazZira
8%3 goals17%
KapazZira
8%4 goals8%
KapazZira

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
KapazZira
75%2 goals25%
KapazZira
67%3 goals8%
KapazZira
17%4 goals0%
KapazZira

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time8%
KapazZira
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KapazZira
17%Scored in both halves17%
KapazZira

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
KapazZira
42%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KapazZira
80%BTTS - last 520%
KapazZira

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
KapazZira
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
KapazZira
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
KapazZira

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
KapazZira
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KapazZira
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
KapazZira

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 336% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.42 pts / match - Kapaz · 1.83 pts / match - Zira

Kapaz - half-time state
8% leading17% draw75% trailing
Zira - half-time state
58% leading8% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.42Points per match (1st half)1.83
KapazZira
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.83
KapazZira
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
KapazZira
1.83Average goals (1st half)1.33
KapazZira
8%Clean sheet before half-time58%
KapazZira
75%No goal before half-time42%
KapazZira

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)1.33
KapazZira
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
KapazZira
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
KapazZira
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.25
KapazZira
33%Clean sheet after half-time58%
KapazZira
67%No goal after half-time58%
KapazZira

Kapaz - second-half results

17% W25% D58% L
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding213%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zira - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kapaz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match2.22.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kapaz
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
0
5
16-30
3
10
31-45
0
5
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Zira
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
8
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kapaz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
222%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

KapazLigaZira
Average goals in match 3.582.51 2.58
Both teams scored 42%45% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%46% 50%
Clean sheets 0%32% 33%
Goal before half-time 92%68% 92%
Goal after half-time 83%75% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KapazYellow cardRauf Hüseynli
  2. KapazSubstitutionOn: Donald Crésus DongoOff: Şahmar Aşurov
  3. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Mutsinzi AngeOff: Alessandro Pinheiro
  4. ZiraYellow cardIron Gomis

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kapaz 0 - 0 - 1 Zira. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Zira IK
5 : 0
FK Kapaz

FAQ

What was the result of Kapaz vs Zira?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Kapaz 0:2 Zira. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kapaz vs Zira?

Kapaz score 0.83 goals per game on average and Zira 1.58. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Kapaz's matches and 58% of Zira's.

What form are Kapaz and Zira in?

Over the last 5 games Kapaz have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Zira 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kapaz vs Zira?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.