Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
Karmiotissa is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.42 goals scored and only 0.75 conceded per match. The hosts occupy a high 3rd position in the standings with a +20 goal difference in home matches and have not recorded a single goalless match at home. MEAP Nisou in away fixtures has only a 42% win rate and a significant 33% loss rate, conceding an average of 1.25 goals per game, and failing to score in 33% of matches. The visitors' recent form is concerning – only 0.8 points per game in their last five outings with three defeats. Considering Karmiotissa's xG advantage (1.67 vs 1.29 against) and the substantial disparity in the quality of the hosts' home play and the guests' away performance, a decisive victory for Karmiotissa appears to be the most likely scenario.
Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Karmiotissa played MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Karmiotissa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Karmiotissa scores 1.92 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.08 and concedes 1.68. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Karmiotissa 54%, MEAP Nisou 48%. Over 2.5: Karmiotissa 63%, MEAP Nisou 48%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Karmiotissa has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.47. Karmiotissa: 8.5 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 7.9.
Match halves
Karmiotissa: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.96. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Karmiotissa: 31-45+ (10 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Karmiotissa is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.42 goals scored and only 0.75 conceded per match. The hosts occupy a high 3rd position in the standings with a +20 goal difference in home matches and have not recorded a single goalless match at home. MEAP Nisou in away fixtures has only a 42% win rate and a significant 33% loss rate, conceding an average of 1.25 goals per game, and failing to score in 33% of matches. The visitors' recent form is concerning – only 0.8 points per game in their last five outings with three defeats. Considering Karmiotissa's xG advantage (1.67 vs 1.29 against) and the substantial disparity in the quality of the hosts' home play and the guests' away performance, a decisive victory for Karmiotissa appears to be the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Karmiotissa | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Karmiotissa is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Karmiotissa · 0.8 pts / match - MEAP Nisou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karmiotissa is 78% better for: goals scored per match.
1.92 goals / match - Karmiotissa · 1.08 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Karmiotissa is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - Karmiotissa · 1.68 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Karmiotissa scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
MEAP Nisou scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Karmiotissa
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Karmiotissa is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.96 pts / match - Karmiotissa · 1.12 pts / match - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Karmiotissa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Karmiotissa
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Karmiotissa | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.60 | ▲ 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 48% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 47% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 30% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Karmiotissa 2 - 0 - 0 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Karmiotissa 1:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Karmiotissa and MEAP Nisou?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Karmiotissa won 2, MEAP Nisou won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou?
Karmiotissa score 1.92 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.08. The Second Division average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Karmiotissa's matches and 48% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Karmiotissa and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Karmiotissa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Karmiotissa vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.