Türkiye - Süper LigRecep Tayyip Erdoğan StadyumuData current as of 07 September 2026

Kasımpaşa vs Amed: match statistics

Kasımpaşa crest
Kasımpaşa
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Amed crest
Amed

Kasımpaşa vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kasımpaşa played Amed in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Stadyumu. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Kasımpaşa: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match. Amed: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kasımpaşa scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Amed scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kasımpaşa 67%, Amed 33%. Over 2.5: Kasımpaşa 0%, Amed 67%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.41 vs 0.93. Kasımpaşa: 9.0 shots per match, Amed: 14.0.

Match halves

Kasımpaşa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Amed: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Kasımpaşa: 0-15 (1 goals). Amed: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Süper Lig: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kasımpaşa remain unbeaten in their last 5 matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Amed have lost 1 match over the same period. However, the home-field context is crucial: although the hosts drew their only home match so far, they scored 1 goal, whereas Amed lost their only away fixture 0:2 and failed to score. The visitors have enjoyed greater possession away from home, 56% compared with 40%, but their 12 shots per match have produced just 1 shot on target and a 0% conversion rate. Kasımpaşa create slightly better-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.09 compared with Amed’s 1.08, while their opponents concede an average of 2 goals away from home. The hosts’ defence does allow opponents an xG of 1.66, meaning a draw remains a realistic scenario, but Amed’s poor away finishing supports a Kasımpaşa win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal for BTTS - No comes from the season data: Amed have yet to score away from home, failing to find the net in 100% of those matches. Kasımpaşa concede just 0.5 goals per home game and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while their opponents’ average xG stands at 0.93. The hosts should also create chances, as they score 2.5 goals per home game, register 6 shots on target, and face a team conceding 2.0 goals. The last five matches for both sides produced goals from both teams in 60% of games, while Amed have averaged 1.8 goals and an xG of 1.60 during this period, reducing confidence in the pick. Despite this improvement in recent form, the combination of Amed’s very poor season scoring record and Kasımpaşa’s solid defense points more strongly towards a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kasımpaşa have a clear home advantage: they average 2.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded at home, while Amed have failed to score away and concede an average of 2.0 goals. However, their broader form over the last five matches is more subdued, with the hosts scoring 1.0 goal and conceding 0.6 per game, while none of their matches went over the 2.5-goal line. Over the same period, Amed averaged 1.8 goals per match, but their games went over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, increasing the scoring potential without suggesting regular four-goal results. The projected total of 2.45 goals remains below the 3.5 line, and both teams have seen 100% of their season matches finish with a maximum of three goals. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the home advantage could produce a controlled victory without requiring an open, high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Kasımpaşa win, as the hosts have scored just 0.4 goals before the break in their last five matches, compared with 0.6 for Amed. Kasımpaşa nevertheless have a clear quality advantage: their average xG is 1.58 versus Amed’s 1.08, while the hosts record an average of 6 shots on target per match compared with just 1 for their opponents. At home, Kasımpaşa score an average of 2.5 goals and concede only 0.5, whereas Amed average no goals scored away from home and allow opponents to score 2.0. A cautious start is suggested by the fact that Amed were level at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, but after the break the hosts have a favorable profile, conceding just 0.2 goals on average. Amed’s form means a surprise result cannot be ruled out entirely, as they have scored 1.8 goals per match over their last five games, but the hosts’ advantage should become most evident in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
KasımpaşaAmed
14Shots14
KasımpaşaAmed
7Shots on target4
KasımpaşaAmed
1.58xG1.48
KasımpaşaAmed
2Corners9
KasımpaşaAmed
28Dangerous attacks44
KasımpaşaAmed
15Fouls10
KasımpaşaAmed
5Cards2
KasımpaşaAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.67
KasımpaşaAmed
0.67Goals conceded / match1
KasımpaşaAmed
34%Average possession47%
KasımpaşaAmed
2.67Shots on target / match4.33
KasımpaşaAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match14
KasımpaşaAmed
2.67Shots on target4.33
KasımpaşaAmed
11.1%Shot conversion11.9%
KasımpaşaAmed
34%Possession47%
KasımpaşaAmed
0.93xG for1.41
KasımpaşaAmed
1.61xG against0.99
KasımpaşaAmed

Shooting quality

Kasımpaşa: BalancedAmed: Attacking
KasımpaşaAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)30%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / match - Kasımpaşa · 2 pts / match - Amed

Kasımpaşa
DWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 0%
Amed
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Kasımpaşa · 1.67 goals / match - Amed

Kasımpaşa is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Kasımpaşa · 1 goals / match - Amed

Kasımpaşa scoring profile: very strong

Kasımpaşa scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Kasımpaşa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)5
KasımpaşaAmed
2Goals conceded (season)3
KasımpaşaAmed
1.67Average goals in match2.67
KasımpaşaAmed
3Goals scored (last 5)5
KasımpaşaAmed
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
KasımpaşaAmed

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%2 goals67%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%3 goals33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%4 goals0%
KasımpaşaAmed

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%2 goals33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%3 goals0%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%4 goals0%
KasımpaşaAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Scored in both halves33%
KasımpaşaAmed

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
KasımpaşaAmed
67%BTTS - last 533%
KasımpaşaAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KasımpaşaAmed

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kasımpaşa is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Kasımpaşa · 0.67 pts / match - Amed

Kasımpaşa - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing
Amed - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.67
KasımpaşaAmed
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.33
KasımpaşaAmed
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
KasımpaşaAmed
1Average goals (1st half)1
KasımpaşaAmed
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed
67%No goal before half-time67%
KasımpaşaAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)2
KasımpaşaAmed
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
KasımpaşaAmed
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KasımpaşaAmed
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
KasımpaşaAmed
100%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KasımpaşaAmed
33%No goal after half-time33%
KasımpaşaAmed

Kasımpaşa - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

67% W0% R33% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kasımpaşa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.33
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.0
Average goals in match1.00.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%100%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.672.00
Goals scored / match0.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match1.01.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kasımpaşa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kasımpaşa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.94
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

KasımpaşaLigaAmed
Average goals in match 1.672.83 2.67
Both teams scored 67%57% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%50% 67%
Clean sheets 33%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KasımpaşaGoalGüven YalçınAssist: Cláudio Winck Neto
  2. AmedYellow cardDia Sabi'A
  3. AmedSubstitutionOn: Rayan LutinOff: Samuel Ballet
  4. KasımpaşaSubstitutionOn: Elson Mendes Da SilvaOff: Marcus Rafferty
  5. KasımpaşaSubstitutionOn: Emi̇rhan BozOff: Andri Fannar Baldursson
  6. KasımpaşaYellow cardKerem Demirbay
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Mohamed KhalilOff: Amadou Cissé
  8. AmedSubstitutionOn: Mehmet YeşilOff: Dia Sabi'A
  9. KasımpaşaYellow cardJesuran Rak-Sakyi
  10. KasımpaşaYellow cardEmi̇rhan Boz
  11. AmedYellow cardDavid Bates
  12. KasımpaşaYellow cardGüven Yalçın
  13. KasımpaşaYellow cardAli Yavuz Kol

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Kasımpaşa vs Amed?

The Süper Lig match finished Kasımpaşa 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kasımpaşa vs Amed?

Kasımpaşa score 1.00 goals per game on average and Amed 1.67. The Süper Lig average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Kasımpaşa's matches and 33% of Amed's.

What form are Kasımpaşa and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Kasımpaşa have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Amed 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kasımpaşa vs Amed?

The statistical background for Kasımpaşa vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.