Kataller Toyama vs Blaublitz Akita: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kataller Toyama play Blaublitz Akita in J2 League (Japan). The match date is 29 November 2025 at 06:00. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Kataller Toyama: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Blaublitz Akita: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kataller Toyama scores 0.89 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Blaublitz Akita scores 1.13 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kataller Toyama 42%, Blaublitz Akita 61%. Over 2.5: Kataller Toyama 39%, Blaublitz Akita 53%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Kataller Toyama has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.27. Kataller Toyama: 11.1 shots per match, Blaublitz Akita: 9.7.

Match halves

Kataller Toyama: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53. Blaublitz Akita: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Kataller Toyama: 76-90+ (8 goals). Blaublitz Akita: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
27Shots6
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
8Shots on target2
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
2.83xG0.87
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
9Corners0
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
80Dangerous attacks48
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
12Fouls15
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3Cards2
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.89Goals scored / match1.13
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
1.29Goals conceded / match1.55
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
49%Average possession40%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3.24Shots on target / match3.29
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.05Shots per match9.71
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3.24Shots on target3.29
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
8.1%Shot conversion11.7%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
49%Possession40%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
1.3xG for1.27
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
1.53xG against1.48
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Shooting quality

Kataller Toyama: BalancedBlaublitz Akita: Balanced
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kataller Toyama is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita

Kataller Toyama
LDWWW
Season result split
24% W26% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-19
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-10
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Blaublitz Akita
DLWDL
Season result split
29% W26% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-17
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.90Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Blaublitz Akita is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.13 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita

Kataller Toyama is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.55 goals / match - Blaublitz Akita

Kataller Toyama scoring profile: strong

Kataller Toyama scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Blaublitz Akita keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

Blaublitz Akita scoring profile: very strong

Blaublitz Akita scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

34Goals scored (season)43
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
49Goals conceded (season)59
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
2.18Average goals in match2.68
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
9Goals scored (last 5)3
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal71%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
21%2 goals32%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
8%3 goals8%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3%4 goals3%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal76%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
42%2 goals45%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
11%3 goals18%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0%4 goals11%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time24%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3%BTTS in both halves5%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
16%Scored in both halves16%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
60%BTTS - last 520%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kataller Toyama is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.05 pts / match - Blaublitz Akita

Kataller Toyama - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
Blaublitz Akita - half-time state
21% leading42% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.05
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.24
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
58%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
66%No goal before half-time63%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.45
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
45%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita
61%No goal after half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaBlaublitz Akita

Kataller Toyama - second-half results

29% W29% R42% P
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Blaublitz Akita - second-half results

21% W45% R34% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kataller Toyama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.42.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Blaublitz Akita - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kataller Toyama
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
10
31-45
6
11
46-60
6
9
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Blaublitz Akita
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
7
7
16-30
8
12
31-45
9
11
46-60
9
4
61-75
6
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kataller Toyama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Blaublitz Akita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Kataller ToyamaLigaBlaublitz Akita
Average goals in match 2.182.46 2.68
Both teams scored 42%51% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%45% 53%
Clean sheets 24%29% 24%
Goal before half-time 68%68% 71%
Goal after half-time 76%74% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kataller Toyama 0 - 1 - 0 Blaublitz Akita. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

AFC Blaublitz Akita
2 : 2
Kataller Toyama

FAQ

What was the result of Kataller Toyama vs Blaublitz Akita?

The J2 League match finished Kataller Toyama 4:1 Blaublitz Akita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Blaublitz Akita?

Kataller Toyama score 0.89 goals per game on average and Blaublitz Akita 1.13. The J2 League average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 61% of Blaublitz Akita's.

What form are Kataller Toyama and Blaublitz Akita in?

Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Blaublitz Akita 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Blaublitz Akita?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.