Kataller Toyama vs Consadole Sapporo: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Kataller Toyama vs Consadole Sapporo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kataller Toyama play Consadole Sapporo in J2 League (Japan). The match date is 25 October 2026. Venue: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium.
Current form
Kataller Toyama: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Consadole Sapporo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kataller Toyama scores 1.82 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Consadole Sapporo scores 1.18 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kataller Toyama 45%, Consadole Sapporo 73%. Over 2.5: Kataller Toyama 45%, Consadole Sapporo 55%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Kataller Toyama has higher xG: 2.31 vs 1.41. Kataller Toyama: 20.4 shots per match, Consadole Sapporo: 11.6.
Match halves
Kataller Toyama: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.09. Consadole Sapporo: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Kataller Toyama: 46-60 (5 goals). Consadole Sapporo: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J2 League: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kataller Toyama | Consadole Sapporo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kataller Toyama is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.4 pts / match - Consadole Sapporo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kataller Toyama is 54% better for: goals scored per match.
1.82 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.18 goals / match - Consadole Sapporo
Kataller Toyama is 73% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.73 goals / match - Consadole Sapporo
Kataller Toyama scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Consadole Sapporo keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
Consadole Sapporo scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kataller Toyama
Over / Under - Consadole Sapporo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kataller Toyama is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.18 pts / match - Consadole Sapporo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kataller Toyama - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Consadole Sapporo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kataller Toyama
Consadole Sapporo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Kataller Toyama | Liga | Consadole Sapporo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.82 | 2.61 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 54% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Kataller Toyama 0 - 0 - 2 Consadole Sapporo. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Kataller Toyama and Consadole Sapporo play?
Kataller Toyama face Consadole Sapporo on 25 October 2026 in J2 League at Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kataller Toyama and Consadole Sapporo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kataller Toyama won 0, Consadole Sapporo won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Consadole Sapporo?
Kataller Toyama score 1.82 goals per game on average and Consadole Sapporo 1.18. The J2 League average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 73% of Consadole Sapporo's.
What form are Kataller Toyama and Consadole Sapporo in?
Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Consadole Sapporo 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Consadole Sapporo?
The statistical background for Kataller Toyama vs Consadole Sapporo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.