Japan - J2 LeagueToyama Athletic Recreation Park StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: match statistics

Kataller Toyama crest
Kataller Toyama
4 : 0half-time 1:0
Imabari crest
Imabari

Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kataller Toyama played Imabari in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Kataller Toyama: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Imabari: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kataller Toyama scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Imabari scores 1.50 and concedes 2.50. League average: 2.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kataller Toyama 0%, Imabari 100%. Over 2.5: Kataller Toyama 50%, Imabari 100%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kataller Toyama has higher xG: 2.54 vs 1.63. Kataller Toyama: 21.5 shots per match, Imabari: 15.5.

Match halves

Kataller Toyama: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Imabari: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Kataller Toyama: 16-30 (2 goals). Imabari: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kataller Toyama sit 7th, while Imabari are 20th and started the season with two defeats. The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches, scoring 7 goals in that period, whereas the visitors are winless during the same span, recording 2 draws and 3 defeats. Imabari have conceded an average of 2 goals away from home, have kept no clean sheets on the road, and their average xG conceded is a high 1.67. The visitors can maintain possession for an average of 60% of the match and create chances worth 1.38 xG, so they may find the net; however, the 9 goals they have conceded in their last five matches significantly reduce their chances of taking points. The table advantage, better recent form and Imabari’s defensive problems all point to a Kataller Toyama win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is clear, as both teams have recorded this scenario in 100% of their current-season matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Kataller Toyama score an average of 2.0 goals but concede as many as 3.0, while Imabari score 1.0 goal and allow opponents 2.0. The hosts create plenty of chances, averaging 18 shots with an xG of 1.87, while the visitors have an xG of 1.38, giving them a solid basis to score despite their weaker results. In their last five matches, Imabari recorded BTTS in 100% of cases and conceded an average of 1.8 goals, while Toyama scored 1.4 and conceded 1.6 goals per match. The hosts’ recent run lowers confidence in the pick, as BTTS occurred in only 40% of their five matches; however, the defensive weaknesses of both sides and Toyama’s high attacking potential still provide stronger support for the “yes” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kataller Toyama creates plenty of chances, averaging 18 shots and 4 on target, with an average xG of 1.87. Imabari have failed to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match and allowing opponents chances worth 1.67 xG. In their last five matches, the two teams scored an average of 1.4 and 1.2 goals per match respectively, while Imabari conceded as many as 1.8 goals. Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal mark in 100% of their appearances so far, which, combined with a projected total of 2.87 goals, gives a clear edge to Over 1.5. The Over 2.5 line also has positive indicators, although it is more sensitive to the away side’s lower conversion rate, with Imabari averaging 1.0 goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kataller Toyama win at full-time, as the hosts have collected 1.4 points per game across their last five matches, compared with Imabari’s mere 0.4. Before the break, Toyama average 0.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Imabari record 0.8 scored and 0.6 conceded, suggesting an evenly matched, cautious opening. After the interval, the hosts improve to 0.8 goals per game, whereas the visitors concede as many as 1.2 goals while scoring only 0.4 after half-time. Toyama also have the higher average xG, 1.87 compared with their opponents’ 1.38, take an average of 18 shots to Imabari’s 13, and register 4 shots on target compared with 3 for Imabari. However, both teams remain defensively vulnerable, having conceded 1.6 and 1.8 goals respectively in their last five matches; therefore, a turnaround after a draw at half-time is more likely than a controlled continuation of a goalless result.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Kataller ToyamaImabari
18Shots10
Kataller ToyamaImabari
5Shots on target2
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1.81xG1.03
Kataller ToyamaImabari
5Corners3
Kataller ToyamaImabari
44Dangerous attacks34
Kataller ToyamaImabari
12Fouls6
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0Cards0
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kataller ToyamaImabari
2Goals scored / match1.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1Goals conceded / match2.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
73%Average possession61%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
6Shots on target / match3.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

21.5Shots per match15.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
6Shots on target3.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
9.3%Shot conversion9.7%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
73%Possession61%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
2.54xG for1.63
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0.94xG against1.65
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Shooting quality

Kataller Toyama: DominantImabari: Dominant
Kataller ToyamaImabari
Accuracy (shots on target)28%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kataller Toyama
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.54Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Imabari
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kataller Toyama is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.5 goals / match - Imabari

Kataller Toyama is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 2.5 goals / match - Imabari

Kataller Toyama scoring profile: very strong

Kataller Toyama scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Imabari scoring profile: very strong

Imabari scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
Kataller ToyamaImabari
2Goals conceded (season)5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
3Average goals in match4
Kataller ToyamaImabari
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Kataller ToyamaImabari
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kataller ToyamaImabari

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%2 goals50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%3 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%4 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%2 goals100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%3 goals50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%4 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%BTTS in both halves50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Scored in both halves50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%BTTS - last 5100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kataller Toyama is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 0.5 pts / match - Imabari

Kataller Toyama - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Imabari - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%No goal before half-time50%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Kataller ToyamaImabari
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari
50%No goal after half-time0%
Kataller ToyamaImabari

Kataller Toyama - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Imabari - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kataller Toyama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Imabari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.50
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.5
Average goals in match1.52.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kataller Toyama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Imabari
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
144%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kataller Toyama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Imabari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Kataller ToyamaLigaImabari
Average goals in match 3.002.43 4.00
Both teams scored 0%35% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 100%
Clean sheets 50%37% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kataller ToyamaGoalManato FurukawaAssist: Sho Fuseya
  2. Kataller ToyamaAssistYoshiki TakahashiGoal: Kazuki Kushibiki
  3. ImabariSubstitutionOn: Hikaru AraiOff: Takafumi Yamada
  4. Kataller ToyamaSubstitutionOn: Shimpei NishiyaOff: Shosei Okamoto
  5. ImabariSubstitutionOn: Taiga SonOff: Kota Mori
  6. Kataller ToyamaSubstitutionOn: Junya ImaseOff: Min-Woo Kang
  7. Kataller ToyamaSubstitutionOn: Riki MatsudaOff: Tae-Won Kim
  8. Kataller ToyamaGoalYuto Kunitake
  9. Kataller ToyamaGoalTsubasa Yoshihira
  10. ImabariSubstitutionOn: Wesley da SilvaOff: Kazuki Kushibiki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kataller Toyama 0 - 1 - 1 Imabari. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Kataller Toyama
1 : 2
FC Imabari
FC Imabari
0 : 0
Kataller Toyama

FAQ

What was the result of Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?

The J2 League match finished Kataller Toyama 4:0 Imabari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kataller Toyama and Imabari?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kataller Toyama won 0, Imabari won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?

Kataller Toyama score 2.00 goals per game on average and Imabari 1.50. The J2 League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 100% of Imabari's.

What form are Kataller Toyama and Imabari in?

Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Imabari 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.