Japan - J2 LeagueToyama Athletic Recreation Park StadiumData current as of 22 September 2026

Kataller Toyama vs Yokohama: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Kataller Toyama vs Yokohama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kataller Toyama play Yokohama in J2 League (Japan). The match date is 26 September 2026. Venue: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium.

Current form

Kataller Toyama: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Yokohama: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kataller Toyama scores 1.86 and concedes 0.71 goals per match. Yokohama scores 1.86 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kataller Toyama 14%, Yokohama 43%. Over 2.5: Kataller Toyama 43%, Yokohama 57%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Kataller Toyama has higher xG: 2.39 vs 1.81. Kataller Toyama: 21.1 shots per match, Yokohama: 16.0.

Match halves

Kataller Toyama: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14. Yokohama: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.29.

Goals by minute

Kataller Toyama: 16-30 (4 goals). Yokohama: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.38)
(3.40)
(2.47)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kataller ToyamaYokohama
1.86Goals scored / match1.86
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0.71Goals conceded / match1.14
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
59%Average possession57%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
7.57Shots on target / match5
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

21.14Shots per match16
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
7.57Shots on target5
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
8.8%Shot conversion11.6%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
59%Possession57%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
2.39xG for1.81
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
1.21xG against1.53
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

Shooting quality

Kataller Toyama: DominantYokohama: Dominant
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kataller Toyama is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.4 pts / match - Yokohama

Kataller Toyama
WLWDW
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.33Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Yokohama
LDWLW
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kataller Toyama is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.71 goals / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.14 goals / match - Yokohama

Kataller Toyama scoring profile: strong

Kataller Toyama scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Yokohama keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Yokohama scoring profile: mixed

Yokohama scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

13Goals scored (season)13
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
5Goals conceded (season)8
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
2.57Average goals in match3
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
9Goals scored (last 5)9
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
57%2 goals57%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
29%3 goals29%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
29%4 goals14%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal71%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
29%2 goals43%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
14%3 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0%4 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
43%Scored in both halves57%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
20%BTTS - last 540%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time86%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - Kataller Toyama · 1.86 pts / match - Yokohama

Kataller Toyama - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing
Yokohama - half-time state
43% leading57% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.86
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
1.29Average goals (1st half)0.71
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
71%Clean sheet before half-time86%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
43%No goal before half-time43%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.57
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
1.29Average goals (2nd half)2.29
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
86%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama
43%No goal after half-time29%
Kataller ToyamaYokohama

Kataller Toyama - second-half results

57% W29% D14% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yokohama - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kataller Toyama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Yokohama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kataller Toyama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Yokohama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kataller Toyama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Yokohama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Kataller ToyamaLigaYokohama
Average goals in match 2.572.54 3.00
Both teams scored 14%46% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%46% 57%
Clean sheets 71%32% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%64% 57%
Goal after half-time 71%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Kataller Toyama and Yokohama play?

Kataller Toyama face Yokohama on 26 September 2026 in J2 League at Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Yokohama?

Kataller Toyama score 1.86 goals per game on average and Yokohama 1.86. The J2 League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 43% of Yokohama's.

What form are Kataller Toyama and Yokohama in?

Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Yokohama 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Yokohama?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kataller Toyama vs Yokohama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.