Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Katsina United vs Kwara United: match statistics

Katsina United crest
Katsina United
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Kwara United crest
Kwara United
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Katsina United displays significantly better home form with an impressive record of 57% wins and 57% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +9 in home matches, while Kwara United records a disastrous away balance of -13. Particularly alarming for the visitors is the fact that they have not won a single away match this season (0% win rate) and failed to score in as many as 71% of their away fixtures. Kwara United loses 71% of their away games, which, combined with the hosts' solid form, makes their chances of a favorable result minimal. The xG statistics also favor Katsina United (1.27 vs 0.92), confirming their qualitative superiority in this encounter.

Katsina United vs Kwara United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Katsina United play Kwara United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 8 March 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Katsina United: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kwara United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Katsina United scores 0.86 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Kwara United scores 0.92 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Katsina United 30%, Kwara United 34%. Over 2.5: Katsina United 22%, Kwara United 29%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Katsina United has higher xG: 1.08 vs 0.99. Katsina United: 2.6 shots per match, Kwara United: 3.6.

Match halves

Katsina United: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.41. Kwara United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.34.

Goals by minute

Katsina United: 31-45+ (8 goals). Kwara United: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Katsina United displays significantly better home form with an impressive record of 57% wins and 57% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +9 in home matches, while Kwara United records a disastrous away balance of -13. Particularly alarming for the visitors is the fact that they have not won a single away match this season (0% win rate) and failed to score in as many as 71% of their away fixtures. Kwara United loses 71% of their away games, which, combined with the hosts' solid form, makes their chances of a favorable result minimal. The xG statistics also favor Katsina United (1.27 vs 0.92), confirming their qualitative superiority in this encounter.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
-1Shots-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
-1Shots on target-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0xG0
Katsina UnitedKwara United
-1Corners-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0Dangerous attacks0
Katsina UnitedKwara United
-1Fouls-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
-1Cards-1
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.86Goals scored / match0.92
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.95Goals conceded / match0.95
Katsina UnitedKwara United
17%Average possession25%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.51Shots on target / match0.92
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.59Shots per match3.61
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.51Shots on target0.92
Katsina UnitedKwara United
33.3%Shot conversion25.5%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
17%Possession25%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
1.08xG for0.99
Katsina UnitedKwara United
1.67xG against1.4
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Shooting quality

Katsina United: Counter-attackingKwara United: Counter-attacking
Katsina UnitedKwara United
Accuracy (shots on target)20%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.420.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.691.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kwara United is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Katsina United · 1.6 pts / match - Kwara United

Katsina United
LWLWL
Season result split
38% W24% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-14
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 2.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Kwara United
DWDWL
Season result split
34% W29% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-12
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.49Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kwara United is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Katsina United · 0.92 goals / match - Kwara United

Katsina United scoring profile: mixed

Katsina United scores in 54% of matches (20 of 37 matches), while Kwara United keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

Kwara United scoring profile: mixed

Kwara United scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Katsina United keeps a clean sheet in 35% (13 of 37 matches).

32Goals scored (season)35
Katsina UnitedKwara United
35Goals conceded (season)36
Katsina UnitedKwara United
1.81Average goals in match1.87
Katsina UnitedKwara United
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Katsina UnitedKwara United
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
Katsina UnitedKwara United

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal55%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
19%2 goals32%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
11%3 goals5%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
3%4 goals0%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal63%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
24%2 goals18%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
5%3 goals11%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0%4 goals3%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time18%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
3%BTTS in both halves5%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
14%Scored in both halves21%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
40%BTTS - last 540%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

49%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Katsina United - half-time state
24% leading65% draw11% trailing
Kwara United - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.37
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.76Average goals (1st half)1
Katsina UnitedKwara United
73%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
62%No goal before half-time53%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.34
Katsina UnitedKwara United
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Katsina UnitedKwara United
1.05Average goals (2nd half)0.87
Katsina UnitedKwara United
46%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Katsina UnitedKwara United
70%No goal after half-time71%
Katsina UnitedKwara United

Katsina United - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
51
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kwara United - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
52
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Katsina United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kwara United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Katsina United
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
2
13
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kwara United
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
6
9
16-30
10
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Katsina United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Kwara United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Katsina UnitedLigaKwara United
Average goals in match 1.812.02 1.87
Both teams scored 30%38% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 22%34% 29%
Clean sheets 35%37% 37%
Goal before half-time 49%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 73%64% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Katsina United 0 - 0 - 1 Kwara United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kwara United
1 : 0
Katsina United

FAQ

What was the result of Katsina United vs Kwara United?

The NPFL match finished Katsina United 1:2 Kwara United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Katsina United vs Kwara United?

Katsina United score 0.86 goals per game on average and Kwara United 0.92. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Katsina United's matches and 34% of Kwara United's.

What form are Katsina United and Kwara United in?

Over the last 5 games Katsina United have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kwara United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Katsina United vs Kwara United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.