Morocco - Botola ProStade de MarrakechData current as of 14 October 2026

Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kawkab Marrakech played Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stade de Marrakech. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kawkab Marrakech: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kawkab Marrakech scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kawkab Marrakech 50%, Ittihad Tanger 100%. Over 2.5: Kawkab Marrakech 50%, Ittihad Tanger 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 2.24 vs 1.81. Kawkab Marrakech: 13.0 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 15.5.

Match halves

Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (1 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ittihad Tanger sit 3rd in the table, while Kawkab Marrakech are 7th. Over their last five matches, the visitors have picked up 8 points and the hosts 6. Away from home, Ittihad have scored an average of 3 goals and conceded 1, while Kawkab have scored 2 goals at home but conceded 3. The visitors have been more clinical, converting 30% of their shots compared with 13%, although the hosts have hit the target more often—an average of 8 times per match, compared with 5. Kawkab’s chances are boosted by the quality of the opportunities they create: their home xG is 1.96, while opponents’ away xG against them is 1.80. However, the home and away statistics are based on just one match for each team, so despite Ittihad’s edge in finishing and recent results, an away win is far from certain.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 60% of Kawkab Marrakech's games and 80% of Ittihad Tanger's, supporting a BTTS - Yes pick. Over this period, the hosts averaged 1.0 goals per match and the visitors 1.4, while both teams conceded 1.0 per match. Kawkab's chances of scoring are boosted by the fact that their opponents allowed chances worth an average of 1.64 xG in their last 5 matches, compared with the 1.29 xG created by the hosts. Ittihad also has a case for finding the net: their average xG across their last 5 matches is 1.65, and Kawkab failed to keep a clean sheet in any of their matches during this period, conceding 5 goals in total. Season figures at home and away show 100% of matches featuring goals from both teams, though this should be treated with more caution than the data from the last 5 outings.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Kawkab averaged 1.0 goals scored and Ittihad 1.4, while both teams conceded 1.0 goal per game. The visitors’ attacking potential is reflected in their average xG of 1.65, compared with 1.29 for the hosts, although Kawkab create more chances at home than their scoring record suggests: 2.71 xG despite averaging 1.0 goal scored. Over 1.5 goals landed in 100% of Kawkab’s home matches and Ittihad’s away matches, but Over 2.5 goals was recorded in only 20% and 40% of their respective last 5 matches. Therefore, with a projection of 2.8 goals, Over 1.5 has the edge, while higher lines do not offer an equally strong signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Kawkab went into the break level in 4 of its last 5 matches and did not lead at the break in any of them. After half-time, the visitors hold a slight edge, having won the second half in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 such wins for the hosts. Ittihad have also averaged 1.4 goals per match recently, compared with Kawkab’s 1.0, and won 2 of their 5 matches, while the hosts won 1. This points to a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time, although a full-time draw remains a close alternative: Kawkab have drawn 3 of their last 5 matches. The forecast is not clear-cut, as the hosts have a higher average xG, 2.71 compared with the visitors’ 1.76, and take 21 shots per match compared with 10.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
7Shots1
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
2Shots on target1
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.87xG0.28
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
6Corners5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
40Dangerous attacks19
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
12Fouls13
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3Cards2
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.5Goals scored / match2
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.5Goals conceded / match1
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
47%Average possession53%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
6.5Shots on target / match8
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match15.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
6.5Shots on target8
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
11.5%Shot conversion12.9%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
47%Possession53%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.81xG for2.24
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.4xG against1.4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

Kawkab Marrakech: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Attacking
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)50%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 2 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech
LW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Ittihad Tanger
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.24Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ittihad Tanger is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 2 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech scoring profile: very strong

Kawkab Marrakech scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3Goals conceded (season)2
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3Average goals in match3
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%2 goals50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%3 goals50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%2 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%3 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%BTTS in both halves0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Scored in both halves50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%BTTS - last 5100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kawkab Marrakech is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 0.5 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%No goal before half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)3
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
2Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%No goal after half-time0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kawkab Marrakech - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.50
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.503.00
Goals scored / match0.51.5
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kawkab Marrakech
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kawkab Marrakech

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.84
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Kawkab MarrakechLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.42▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%47%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%42%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%37%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%58%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%68%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.84
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+-47%
Home attack advantage
+-88%
Home defence advantage
+-32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
11%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kawkab MarrakechGoalAyoub Maamouri
  2. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardAyoub Maamouri
  3. Ittihad TangerGoalYounes NajjariAssist: Gape Mohutsiwa
  4. Ittihad TangerYellow cardAchraf Laaziri
  5. Ittihad TangerYellow cardBabacar Sarr
  6. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardKhalil Tamrani
  7. Kawkab MarrakechSubstitutionOn: Oussama HafariOff: Ayoub Maamouri
  8. Kawkab MarrakechGoalMouhcine RabjaAssist: Oussama Hafari
  9. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardMouhcine Rabja
  10. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Senad JarovićOff: Zakaria Kiani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kawkab Marrakech 0 - 1 - 1 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished Kawkab Marrakech 2:1 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kawkab Marrakech and Ittihad Tanger?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kawkab Marrakech won 0, Ittihad Tanger won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

Kawkab Marrakech score 1.50 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 2.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kawkab Marrakech's matches and 100% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are Kawkab Marrakech and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games Kawkab Marrakech have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.