Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès: match statistics
Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kawkab Marrakech played Maghreb Fès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 2 July 2026. Venue: Stade de Marrakech. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Kawkab Marrakech: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Maghreb Fès: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kawkab Marrakech scores 0.93 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Maghreb Fès scores 1.36 and concedes 0.61. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kawkab Marrakech 46%, Maghreb Fès 43%. Over 2.5: Kawkab Marrakech 32%, Maghreb Fès 32%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Kawkab Marrakech has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.20. Kawkab Marrakech: 11.1 shots per match, Maghreb Fès: 8.9.
Match halves
Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.43. Maghreb Fès: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (9 goals). Maghreb Fès: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win: Maghreb Fès sit 1st with 15 wins and 38 goals this season versus Kawkab Marrakech’s 8 wins and 26 goals. Form gap is clear — in the last 5 matches Maghreb scored 7 goals and average 2.0 points (3-1-1), while Kawkab has 3 goals and 0.8 points (1-1-3). The visitors’ defense looks more reliable: Maghreb concedes 0.5 goals on average away and keeps 50% clean sheets, whereas Kawkab at home concedes 0.79 and has 43% clean sheets. Kawkab creates slightly more at home (avg xG 1.41, 11.64 shots and 3.93 on target per match), but their conversion is 12% and they have a 29% share of matches without scoring, while Maghreb have lower away xG 1.01, better conversion 14% and FTS 21%. Considering table advantage, superior shot efficiency and form (2.0 vs 0.8 points in last 5), I give the visitors the higher probability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season figures show Kawkab Marrakech scores 1.57 and concedes 0.71 per match, while Maghreb Fès scores 1.14 and concedes only 0.50 away; seasonal BTTS is 36% for the home side and 50% for the visitors, giving a mixed picture. In the last 5 matches the stronger signal is Maghreb Fès — the away team has BTTS in 80% of games, scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and has recent xG attack 1.43 versus xG defense 0.93, whereas Kawkab has only 20% BTTS, 3 goals (0.6 per match) and xG attack 1.21 against xG defense 1.31. However, the hosts create more chances: on average 4.64 shots on target and 9.71 total shots with a 16% conversion, versus the visitors' 3.07 on target and 8.0 total shots with a 14% conversion, confirming Kawkab can capitalize on opportunities. Both teams have 50% of matches with a clean sheet, and the league records BTTS at 52% with an average of 2.17 goals per match, indicating moderate chances and many games without one side scoring. Considering the strong away form signal (80% BTTS and 7 goals in 5 matches) and the hosts' moderate advantage in chance creation, I favor the 'both teams to score' scenario — 60% for BTTS - Yes and 40% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics, the expected score is 1.29 xG for Kawkab Marrakech and 1.06 xG for Maghreb Fès, totaling 2.35 expected goals. A Poisson model with these lambdas gives roughly a 68% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which aligns with the seasonal Over 1.5 rate of 64% for both teams. The chance of Over 2.5 is moderate—the model forecasts ~42% (seasonal Over 2.5: home 43%, away 21%)—so exceeding 2.5 is possible but not certain. Over 3.5 is unlikely (~21%), consistent with seasonal Over 3.5 rates of home 21% and away 0%; additionally, both teams have 50% clean sheets and Maghreb Fès concedes only 0.5 goals per game on average. Considering the higher number of shots on target by the home side (4.64 vs 3.07) and conversion rates of 16% vs 14%, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely — averaged first-half draw rates are 36% for Kawkab and 50% for Maghreb, yielding about a 43% chance of a draw at the break. Kawkab holds the advantage after the break: they average 0.93 second-half goals (scored_2hg_avg_home = 0.93) and have scored 8 goals in minutes 76–90, whereas Maghreb averages 0.64 second-half goals and just 1 goal in 76–90. Overall Kawkab generates more xG (1.40 vs. 1.01) and 4.64 shots on target versus the visitors’ 3.07, increasing the likelihood of them scoring the decisive goal after half-time. Additionally, the high proportion of clean first halves (71% for the home side and 79% for the away side) and the low BTTS in the first half (14% and 7%) favor a half-time draw, from which Kawkab has a greater chance to produce a turnaround in the second half. Therefore my strongest signal is X/1 (Half-Time draw, Full-Time home win) at 22% probability, with the closest alternative being 1/1 at 20%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kawkab Marrakech | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maghreb Fès is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 2 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maghreb Fès is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.36 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
Maghreb Fès is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.89 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 0.61 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
Kawkab Marrakech scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 matches).
Maghreb Fès scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kawkab Marrakech
Over / Under - Maghreb Fès
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maghreb Fès is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.61 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Maghreb Fès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kawkab Marrakech
Maghreb Fès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Kawkab Marrakech | Liga | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.82 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 52% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 38% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 63% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kawkab Marrakech 0 - 1 - 0 Maghreb Fès. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès?
The Botola Pro match finished Kawkab Marrakech 0:0 Maghreb Fès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès?
Kawkab Marrakech score 0.93 goals per game on average and Maghreb Fès 1.36. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Kawkab Marrakech's matches and 43% of Maghreb Fès's.
What form are Kawkab Marrakech and Maghreb Fès in?
Over the last 5 games Kawkab Marrakech have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Maghreb Fès 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kawkab Marrakech vs Maghreb Fès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


