Kawkab Marrakech vs Wydad Casablanca: match statistics
Kawkab Marrakech vs Wydad Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kawkab Marrakech played Wydad Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Kawkab Marrakech: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Wydad Casablanca: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kawkab Marrakech scores 0.87 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Wydad Casablanca scores 1.73 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kawkab Marrakech 53%, Wydad Casablanca 53%. Over 2.5: Kawkab Marrakech 33%, Wydad Casablanca 47%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.38. Kawkab Marrakech: 12.1 shots per match, Wydad Casablanca: 11.8.
Match halves
Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.33. Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (6 goals). Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
On paper Wydad Casablanca is stronger — they sit 4th with 9 wins and 26 goals this season, while Kawkab Marrakech are 10th with 3 wins and 13 goals. However, Kawkab are very solid at home: they concede only 0.71 goals per game on average and keep clean sheets in 43% of matches, and they are unbeaten in their last 5 matches (1 win, 4 draws), which translates to about 1.4 points per game in that period. Wydad have a clear offensive edge on paper — away they score 2.13 goals on average with 18% shot conversion and 4.88 shots on target per game, while Kawkab at home score 1.29 goals with a 12% conversion. The visitors, however, are in poorer recent form: winless in their last five, averaging only 0.6 points per game and conceding 6 goals, which lowers their chances. Considering similar xG values (Kawkab 1.41 vs Wydad 1.49), Kawkab’s high home draw rate (43%) and the hosts’ superior defensive record at home (0.71 conceded vs Wydad’s 1.13 conceded away), a draw looks most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data shows a conflict: Wydad averages 2.13 goals per game and has a season BTTS 63%, indicating frequent involvement in matches where both teams score, whereas Kawkab at home scores 1.29 goals and has a season BTTS of only 43%. Key defensive signal is Kawkab’s 57% clean sheets at home and an average conceded 0.57, while Wydad has only 13% clean sheets and concedes 1.13 goals per match. From a chance-creation perspective both teams have similar xG: 1.50 for Kawkab vs 1.49 for Wydad, and average shots on target are comparable (4.71 vs 4.88), meaning goal opportunities exist for both. However, the league is generally characterized by a high clean sheet rate (67%) and a low average goals 2.12, and the last 5 matches for both sides show BTTS at 60% with returns: Kawkab 4-3 (0.8 scored, 0.6 conceded) and Wydad 4-6 (0.8 scored, 1.2 conceded). Considering the dominant defensive signal from the home side (57% clean sheets) and the high league clean sheet rate (67%), I tip BTTS - No with a probability of 60% versus 40% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect approximately 2.80 total goals: about 1.45 for Kawkab (their offensive xG 1.50 versus Wydad’s average allowed xG 1.40 gives ≈1.45) and about 1.35 for Wydad (offensive xG 1.49 versus Kawkab’s defense 1.21 gives ≈1.35). With total xG ≈2.80, a Poisson model indicates roughly a 77% chance of Over 1.5, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~31% for Over 3.5. Wydad is more efficient in finishing: on average 11.5 shots per match at an 18% conversion rate versus Kawkab’s 12.14 shots and 11% conversion, and seasonally Wydad scores 2.13 goals vs Kawkab’s 1.29, which increases the likelihood of goals from their side. Although Kawkab has a high clean sheet rate (57%), seasonal over rates (Kawkab Over2.5 29% vs Wydad 63%) and the higher away xG make the strongest play Over 1.5 (recommended Over 77% / Under 23%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a Half-Time/Full-Time draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2), because in the last five meetings the home side were level at the break in 60% of matches, while the visitors were level at half-time in 80% of cases, which strongly favors a draw after 45 minutes. Wydad has a clear advantage after the break: they average 1.38 goals in the second half versus 0.86 for Kawkab and win the second half in 50% of matches compared to 28% for the hosts. Seasonal averages also support the visitors — Wydad scores 2.13 goals per game versus Kawkab’s 1.29, and shot conversion is 18% versus 11% for the home team. At the same time xG is virtually equal (1.50 vs 1.49), and the hosts frequently keep a clean sheet at half-time (86%), which explains the high probability of a HT draw, but Wydad’s clinical finishing and second-half form shift the advantage to X/2 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kawkab Marrakech | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kawkab Marrakech is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 0.8 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wydad Casablanca is 99% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.73 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca
Kawkab Marrakech scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Wydad Casablanca scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kawkab Marrakech
Over / Under - Wydad Casablanca
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wydad Casablanca is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.93 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wydad Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kawkab Marrakech
Wydad Casablanca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Kawkab Marrakech | Liga | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.73 | 2.11 | ▲ 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 33% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 59% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardAbdelilah Hafidi
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kawkab Marrakech 0 - 0 - 1 Wydad Casablanca. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kawkab Marrakech vs Wydad Casablanca?
The Botola Pro match finished Kawkab Marrakech 0:0 Wydad Casablanca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kawkab Marrakech vs Wydad Casablanca?
Kawkab Marrakech score 0.87 goals per game on average and Wydad Casablanca 1.73. The Botola Pro average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Kawkab Marrakech's matches and 53% of Wydad Casablanca's.
What form are Kawkab Marrakech and Wydad Casablanca in?
Over the last 5 games Kawkab Marrakech have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Wydad Casablanca 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kawkab Marrakech vs Wydad Casablanca?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


