Kayserispor vs Rizespor: match statistics
Kayserispor vs Rizespor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kayserispor played Rizespor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Kayserispor: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rizespor: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kayserispor scores 0.70 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Rizespor scores 1.37 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kayserispor 47%, Rizespor 57%. Over 2.5: Kayserispor 50%, Rizespor 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Rizespor has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.29. Kayserispor: 11.6 shots per match, Rizespor: 12.6.
Match halves
Kayserispor: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.63. Rizespor: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Kayserispor: 76-90+ (9 goals). Rizespor: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Süper Lig: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rizespor appears to be the favorite: the visitors sit 8th in the table vs Kayserispor’s 17th and have scored 41 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 21, while conceding 42 vs 57. At home Kayserispor average only 0.71 goals and concede 2.14 per match, despite a home xG of 1.39 — indicating issues with finishing and chance conversion. Rizespor away average 1.47 goals with xG 1.23 and concede 1.53, and their conversion rate is 13% vs the hosts’ 6%, with a similar number of on-target shots (3.67 vs 3.64). Form supports the visitors’ edge: Kayserispor have averaged 0.6 pts in their last 5 (LWLLL — 1 win, 4 losses), while Rizespor average 1.4 pts (LLWWD — 2 wins, 1 draw), giving the visitors better momentum. Additionally, the hosts failed to score in 43% of home matches, whereas Rizespor were shut out away in only 20% of games, so I back a Rizespor win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Rizespor presents a very strong BTTS signal: season BTTS 73% and 80% in the last 5 matches, with an average of 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded in those five games. Kayserispor has season BTTS 40% and only 20% in the last 5 matches; in the same sample they average 0.4 goals scored and concede 2.2 goals (total 2 scored and 11 conceded), indicating poor attacking form from the visitors. Over the season Rizespor have scored 41 goals versus Kayserispor’s 21, and although Kayserispor has a higher season xG_for 1.44 versus Rizespor 1.23, the home side have lower conversion efficiency (9% vs 13%) and only 40% clean sheets at home compared to 13% clean sheets for the away side. The league averages 55% BTTS matches, and the combination of over 2.5 and BTTS occurs for the away team in 53% of matches vs 33% for the home team, which further supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Based on this I tip BTTS = Yes and assess the probability at approximately 70% for Yes vs 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average attacking xG and defensive xG point to a higher-scoring game: Kayserispor has home xG for 1.44 and xG against 1.48, Rizespor has away xG for 1.23 and xG against 1.55; averaging these yields expected xG of 1.50 for the home side and 1.36 for the visitors, a total of 2.86 goals. A Poisson model with parameter 2.86 gives roughly a 78% probability for OVER 1.5, 54% for OVER 2.5 and 32% for OVER 3.5 (corresponding 22%, 46%, 68% on the unders). Seasonal rates support these projections: matches over 1.5 stand at 67% for Kayserispor at home and 80% for Rizespor away, and in the last 5 matches Rizespor scored 9 goals while Kayserispor conceded 11. This season Kayserispor has 21 goals scored and 57 conceded versus Rizespor’s 41 scored, further increasing the likelihood of a multi-goal match and BTTS scenarios. Considering expected xG of 1.50/1.36, the high seasonal over rates (67% and 80%) and the model’s 78% on OVER 1.5, the strongest signal from the data is to pick OVER 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I project X/1 (draw at Half-Time, home win at Full-Time) as the most likely outcome: the home side have been level at the break in 40% of their matches and the visitors in 53%, strongly supporting a draw at Half-Time. Indicators for a home turnaround include season-long figures — 47% home win rate and an average of 1.53 points per home match versus the visitors’ 0.93 points — as well as higher home xG of 1.44 compared to the visitors’ 1.23. Additionally, both teams see goals after the break in 80% of their games; the hosts average 1.4 points after Half-Time and win second halves in 33% of cases, while the visitors register 1.07 points and 20% second-half wins, all favoring a turnaround following an HT draw. However, account for the hosts’ poor short-term form — in their last five matches they were trailing at Half-Time in 80% and averaged 0.0 first-half goals in that run, which is why I do not expect the hosts to lead at the break. In summary: the high frequency of draws at Half-Time (40% vs 53%), Kayserispor’s seasonal advantage (47% wins, xG 1.44) and strong second-half metrics (80% matches with post-break goals, 1.4 points after Half-Time) make X/1 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kayserispor | Rizespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rizespor is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Kayserispor · 1.4 pts / match - Rizespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rizespor is 96% better for: goals scored per match.
0.7 goals / match - Kayserispor · 1.37 goals / match - Rizespor
Rizespor is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.9 goals / match - Kayserispor · 1.4 goals / match - Rizespor
Kayserispor scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Rizespor keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
Rizespor scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Kayserispor keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kayserispor
Over / Under - Rizespor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rizespor is 140% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.53 pts / match - Kayserispor · 1.27 pts / match - Rizespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kayserispor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rizespor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kayserispor
Rizespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Kayserispor | Liga | Rizespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.63 | ▲ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 79% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kayserispor 1 - 0 - 0 Rizespor. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kayserispor vs Rizespor?
The Süper Lig match finished Kayserispor 2:0 Rizespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kayserispor vs Rizespor?
Kayserispor score 0.70 goals per game on average and Rizespor 1.37. The Süper Lig average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Kayserispor's matches and 57% of Rizespor's.
What form are Kayserispor and Rizespor in?
Over the last 5 games Kayserispor have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rizespor 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kayserispor vs Rizespor?
The statistical background for Kayserispor vs Rizespor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


