Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueAl-Sadaqua Walsalam StadiumData current as of 20 October 2026

Kazma vs Al Sulaibikhat: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Kazma vs Al Sulaibikhat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kazma play Al Sulaibikhat in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 23 October 2026. Venue: Al-Sadaqua Walsalam Stadium.

Current form

Kazma: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. Al Sulaibikhat: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kazma scores 1.75 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Al Sulaibikhat scores 1.00 and concedes 2.60. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kazma 75%, Al Sulaibikhat 60%. Over 2.5: Kazma 50%, Al Sulaibikhat 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Kazma has higher xG: 2.06 vs 1.03. Kazma: 15.8 shots per match, Al Sulaibikhat: 6.6.

Match halves

Kazma: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Sulaibikhat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Kazma: 16-30 (3 goals). Al Sulaibikhat: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match1
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
1Goals conceded / match2.6
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
53%Average possession46%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
5.25Shots on target / match3.2
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.75Shots per match6.6
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
5.25Shots on target3.2
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
11.1%Shot conversion15.2%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
53%Possession46%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
2.06xG for1.03
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0.99xG against1.31
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

Shooting quality

Kazma: AttackingAl Sulaibikhat: Counter-attacking
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
Accuracy (shots on target)33%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kazma is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kazma · 0.6 pts / match - Al Sulaibikhat

Kazma
WDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
WDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.06Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Al Sulaibikhat
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kazma is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Kazma · 1 goals / match - Al Sulaibikhat

Kazma is 160% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Kazma · 2.6 goals / match - Al Sulaibikhat

Kazma scoring profile: very strong

Kazma scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Al Sulaibikhat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Al Sulaibikhat scoring profile: strong

Al Sulaibikhat scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)5
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
4Goals conceded (season)13
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
2.75Average goals in match3.6
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
7Goals scored (last 5)5
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal60%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%2 goals20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%3 goals20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0%4 goals0%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
25%2 goals40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0%3 goals40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0%4 goals20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
25%BTTS in both halves20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%Scored in both halves20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
75%BTTS - last 560%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kazma is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Kazma · 0.8 pts / match - Al Sulaibikhat

Kazma - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing
Al Sulaibikhat - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.8
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.4
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.4
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.8
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%Clean sheet before half-time40%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
25%No goal before half-time60%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.2
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.8
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%Clean sheet after half-time20%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat
50%No goal after half-time60%
KazmaAl Sulaibikhat

Kazma - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Sulaibikhat - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kazma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.75
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.31.5
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 25% leading - 75% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 3
Al Sulaibikhat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Al Sulaibikhat
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Al Sulaibikhat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

KazmaLigaAl Sulaibikhat
Average goals in match▼ 2.753.19▲ 3.60
Both teams scored▲ 75%56%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%56%▼ 40%
Clean sheets• 25%24%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%81%• 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%85%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.52
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Kazma and Al Sulaibikhat play?

Kazma face Al Sulaibikhat on 23 October 2026 in Kuwait Premier League at Al-Sadaqua Walsalam Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kazma vs Al Sulaibikhat?

Kazma score 1.75 goals per game on average and Al Sulaibikhat 1.00. The Kuwait Premier League average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kazma's matches and 60% of Al Sulaibikhat's.

What form are Kazma and Al Sulaibikhat in?

Over the last 5 games Kazma have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Al Sulaibikhat 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kazma vs Al Sulaibikhat?

The statistical background for Kazma vs Al Sulaibikhat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.