KCCA vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KCCA played NEC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 12 December 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KCCA: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. NEC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KCCA scores 1.56 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. NEC scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KCCA 67%, NEC 67%. Over 2.5: KCCA 56%, NEC 22%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

NEC has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.43. KCCA: 9.6 shots per match, NEC: 9.4.

Match halves

KCCA: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78. NEC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

KCCA: 31-45+ (3 goals). NEC: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
KCCANEC
9Shots7
KCCANEC
4Shots on target1
KCCANEC
1.16xG0.91
KCCANEC
3Corners7
KCCANEC
44Dangerous attacks56
KCCANEC
7Fouls19
KCCANEC
0Cards0
KCCANEC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1
KCCANEC
0.89Goals conceded / match1
KCCANEC
59%Average possession40%
KCCANEC
4.44Shots on target / match2.56
KCCANEC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.56Shots per match9.44
KCCANEC
4.44Shots on target2.56
KCCANEC
16.3%Shot conversion10.6%
KCCANEC
59%Possession40%
KCCANEC
1.43xG for1.62
KCCANEC
1.11xG against1.54
KCCANEC

Shooting quality

KCCA: Efficient finishingNEC: Balanced
KCCANEC
Accuracy (shots on target)46%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KCCA is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - KCCA · 1.2 pts / match - NEC

KCCA
WLWWW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
NEC
DLWDD
Season result split
22% W56% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-2
1.22 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - KCCA · 1 goals / match - NEC

KCCA is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - KCCA · 1 goals / match - NEC

KCCA scoring profile: very strong

KCCA scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

14Goals scored (season)9
KCCANEC
8Goals conceded (season)9
KCCANEC
2.44Average goals in match2
KCCANEC
10Goals scored (last 5)5
KCCANEC
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
KCCANEC

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal89%
KCCANEC
56%2 goals11%
KCCANEC
11%3 goals0%
KCCANEC
11%4 goals0%
KCCANEC

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
KCCANEC
11%2 goals22%
KCCANEC
0%3 goals0%
KCCANEC
0%4 goals0%
KCCANEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
KCCANEC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KCCANEC
33%Scored in both halves11%
KCCANEC

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
KCCANEC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KCCANEC
80%BTTS - last 580%
KCCANEC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
KCCANEC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
KCCANEC
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KCCANEC

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
KCCANEC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KCCANEC
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
KCCANEC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KCCA · 1.67 pts / match - NEC

KCCA - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
NEC - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.67
KCCANEC
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.44
KCCANEC
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.11
KCCANEC
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.56
KCCANEC
56%Clean sheet before half-time89%
KCCANEC
56%No goal before half-time56%
KCCANEC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1
KCCANEC
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
KCCANEC
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
KCCANEC
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.33
KCCANEC
67%Clean sheet after half-time44%
KCCANEC
33%No goal after half-time44%
KCCANEC

KCCA - second-half results

44% W33% D22% L
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NEC - second-half results

22% W33% D44% L
15
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

NEC
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCCALigaNEC
Average goals in match• 2.442.42▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 67%49%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%43%▼ 22%
Clean sheets▼ 22%31%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%62%▼ 44%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%61%▲ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
0.95
Away goals / match
+55%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Saidi Mayanja⚽ 2

Away team

Other recorded players

—Titus Tito Ssematimba⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KCCAGoalSaidi Mayanja
  2. NECGoalTitus Tito Ssematimba
  3. KCCAGoalSaidi Mayanja

FAQ

What was the result of KCCA vs NEC?

The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 2:1 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs NEC?

KCCA score 1.56 goals per game on average and NEC 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 67% of KCCA's matches and 67% of NEC's.

What form are KCCA and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and NEC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs NEC?

The statistical background for KCCA vs NEC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.