Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 19 October 2026

KCCA vs UPDF: match statistics

KCCA crest
KCCA
4 : 0half-time 2:0
UPDF crest
UPDF
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

KCCA displays significantly higher form and quality, sitting in 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins this season. The hosts are undefeated at home (83% wins, 0% losses) and have recorded a streak of 5 consecutive wins in their last 5 home matches. UPDF is in 15th position with only 3 wins this season and poor away form (57% losses, merely 29% wins). The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.95 vs 1.62), and KCCA scores an average of 1.83 goals per home match, while UPDF concedes an average of 1.86 goals away. The difference in class between the two teams is clear, and the hosts' advantage in every statistical aspect points to a certain victory for KCCA.

KCCA vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KCCA played UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 27 January 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

KCCA: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. UPDF: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KCCA scores 1.31 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. UPDF scores 0.92 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KCCA 54%, UPDF 46%. Over 2.5: KCCA 46%, UPDF 46%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

KCCA has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.53. KCCA: 11.2 shots per match, UPDF: 11.0.

Match halves

KCCA: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.62. UPDF: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

KCCA: 76-90+ (4 goals). UPDF: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KCCA displays significantly higher form and quality, sitting in 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins this season. The hosts are undefeated at home (83% wins, 0% losses) and have recorded a streak of 5 consecutive wins in their last 5 home matches. UPDF is in 15th position with only 3 wins this season and poor away form (57% losses, merely 29% wins). The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.95 vs 1.62), and KCCA scores an average of 1.83 goals per home match, while UPDF concedes an average of 1.86 goals away. The difference in class between the two teams is clear, and the hosts' advantage in every statistical aspect points to a certain victory for KCCA.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
KCCAUPDF
12Shots11
KCCAUPDF
8Shots on target3
KCCAUPDF
1.8xG1.47
KCCAUPDF
4Corners2
KCCAUPDF
66Dangerous attacks77
KCCAUPDF
15Fouls15
KCCAUPDF
0Cards0
KCCAUPDF

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.31Goals scored / match0.92
KCCAUPDF
0.85Goals conceded / match1.46
KCCAUPDF
58%Average possession48%
KCCAUPDF
4.23Shots on target / match2.46
KCCAUPDF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.23Shots per match11
KCCAUPDF
4.23Shots on target2.46
KCCAUPDF
11.6%Shot conversion8.4%
KCCAUPDF
58%Possession48%
KCCAUPDF
1.57xG for1.53
KCCAUPDF
1.1xG against1.19
KCCAUPDF

Shooting quality

KCCA: BalancedUPDF: Balanced
KCCAUPDF
Accuracy (shots on target)38%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KCCA is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KCCA · 1 pts / match - UPDF

KCCA
WWWLD
Season result split
62% W23% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-2
2.08 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UPDF
WDDLL
Season result split
23% W15% D62% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - KCCA · 0.92 goals / match - UPDF

KCCA is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - KCCA · 1.46 goals / match - UPDF

KCCA scoring profile: strong

KCCA scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

UPDF scoring profile: strong

UPDF scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

17Goals scored (season)12
KCCAUPDF
11Goals conceded (season)19
KCCAUPDF
2.15Average goals in match2.38
KCCAUPDF
5Goals scored (last 5)5
KCCAUPDF
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
KCCAUPDF

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
KCCAUPDF
46%2 goals23%
KCCAUPDF
8%3 goals0%
KCCAUPDF
8%4 goals0%
KCCAUPDF

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
KCCAUPDF
15%2 goals46%
KCCAUPDF
0%3 goals15%
KCCAUPDF
0%4 goals8%
KCCAUPDF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time23%
KCCAUPDF
0%BTTS in both halves15%
KCCAUPDF
31%Scored in both halves23%
KCCAUPDF

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
KCCAUPDF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KCCAUPDF
40%BTTS - last 540%
KCCAUPDF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
KCCAUPDF
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KCCAUPDF
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
KCCAUPDF

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
KCCAUPDF
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
KCCAUPDF
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KCCAUPDF

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KCCA is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - KCCA · 0.85 pts / match - UPDF

KCCA - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
UPDF - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)0.85
KCCAUPDF
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.38
KCCAUPDF
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
KCCAUPDF
1Average goals (1st half)1.31
KCCAUPDF
69%Clean sheet before half-time46%
KCCAUPDF
54%No goal before half-time62%
KCCAUPDF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.38
KCCAUPDF
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
KCCAUPDF
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
KCCAUPDF
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.08
KCCAUPDF
62%Clean sheet after half-time62%
KCCAUPDF
46%No goal after half-time46%
KCCAUPDF

KCCA - second-half results

31% W46% D23% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UPDF - second-half results

31% W46% D23% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCCALigaUPDF
Average goals in match▼ 2.152.30• 2.38
Both teams scored▲ 54%45%• 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 46%41%▲ 46%
Clean sheets▼ 31%33%▼ 31%
Goal before half-time▲ 69%61%▲ 69%
Goal after half-time▲ 69%62%▲ 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Alpha Thierry Ssali⚽ 1
—Joel Sserunjogi⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KCCAGoalJoel Sserunjogi
  2. KCCAGoalAlpha Thierry Ssali

FAQ

What was the result of KCCA vs UPDF?

The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 4:0 UPDF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs UPDF?

KCCA score 1.31 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.92. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 54% of KCCA's matches and 46% of UPDF's.

What form are KCCA and UPDF in?

Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UPDF 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs UPDF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.