KCCA vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KCCA played URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 21 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KCCA: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KCCA scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. URA scores 0.83 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KCCA 50%, URA 50%. Over 2.5: KCCA 33%, URA 17%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.39. KCCA: 9.7 shots per match, URA: 10.2.

Match halves

KCCA: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. URA: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

KCCA: 0-15 (2 goals). URA: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
KCCAURA
15Shots11
KCCAURA
8Shots on target4
KCCAURA
2.14xG1.5
KCCAURA
4Corners6
KCCAURA
88Dangerous attacks73
KCCAURA
13Fouls15
KCCAURA
0Cards0
KCCAURA

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.83
KCCAURA
0.83Goals conceded / match0.67
KCCAURA
59%Average possession50%
KCCAURA
4.33Shots on target / match3.83
KCCAURA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match10.17
KCCAURA
4.33Shots on target3.83
KCCAURA
13.8%Shot conversion8.2%
KCCAURA
59%Possession50%
KCCAURA
1.39xG for1.49
KCCAURA
1.11xG against1.5
KCCAURA

Shooting quality

KCCA: Efficient finishingURA: Balanced
KCCAURA
Accuracy (shots on target)45%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KCCA is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KCCA · 1.4 pts / match - URA

KCCA
WDWWL
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
URA
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W83% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-0
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 away
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - KCCA · 0.83 goals / match - URA

URA is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - KCCA · 0.67 goals / match - URA

KCCA scoring profile: mixed

KCCA scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

URA scoring profile: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
KCCAURA
5Goals conceded (season)4
KCCAURA
2.17Average goals in match1.5
KCCAURA
7Goals scored (last 5)5
KCCAURA
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
KCCAURA

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
KCCAURA
33%2 goals17%
KCCAURA
17%3 goals17%
KCCAURA
17%4 goals0%
KCCAURA

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal50%
KCCAURA
17%2 goals17%
KCCAURA
0%3 goals0%
KCCAURA
0%4 goals0%
KCCAURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
KCCAURA
0%BTTS in both halves17%
KCCAURA
33%Scored in both halves17%
KCCAURA

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
KCCAURA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KCCAURA
40%BTTS - last 560%
KCCAURA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KCCAURA
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
KCCAURA
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
KCCAURA

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
KCCAURA
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
KCCAURA
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KCCAURA

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KCCA · 1.5 pts / match - URA

KCCA - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
URA - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.5
KCCAURA
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KCCAURA
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KCCAURA
1Average goals (1st half)0.83
KCCAURA
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KCCAURA
67%No goal before half-time67%
KCCAURA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.17
KCCAURA
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
KCCAURA
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KCCAURA
1.17Average goals (2nd half)0.67
KCCAURA
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KCCAURA
33%No goal after half-time67%
KCCAURA

KCCA - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

URA - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCCALigaURA
Average goals in match• 2.172.24▼ 1.50
Both teams scored• 50%49%• 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%41%▼ 17%
Clean sheets• 33%33%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%57%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 67%51%• 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
0.94
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of KCCA vs URA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 2:1 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs URA?

KCCA score 1.33 goals per game on average and URA 0.83. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of KCCA's matches and 50% of URA's.

What form are KCCA and URA in?

Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and URA 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs URA?

The statistical background for KCCA vs URA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.