Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 23 July 2026

Keçiörengücü vs Amed: match statistics

Keçiörengücü crest
Keçiörengücü
2 : 2half-time 1:2
Amed crest
Amed
130%(2.70)
X25%(3.40)
245%(2.20)

Amed is showing significantly better form over the last five matches (2.2 points per match) compared to Keçiörengücü (1.2 points per match), reflecting an unbeaten run of three wins and two draws. The visitors sit third in the table with 16 season wins, while the hosts are ninth with just 10 victories. However, Keçiörengücü has lost three of their last five outings, conceding 12 goals, which highlights defensive vulnerabilities. Amed demonstrates defensive stability, conceding only 2 goals in the last five games and dominating possession (53% vs 46%). Although the hosts possess a decent home record (46% win rate), the disparity in class and current momentum favors Amed, making them the clear favorite for this match.

Keçiörengücü vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Keçiörengücü play Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 28 February 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Keçiörengücü: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Keçiörengücü scores 1.87 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Keçiörengücü 62%, Amed 55%. Over 2.5: Keçiörengücü 59%, Amed 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.50. Keçiörengücü: 13.3 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.

Match halves

Keçiörengücü: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.77. Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16.

Goals by minute

Keçiörengücü: 31-45+ (18 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Amed is showing significantly better form over the last five matches (2.2 points per match) compared to Keçiörengücü (1.2 points per match), reflecting an unbeaten run of three wins and two draws. The visitors sit third in the table with 16 season wins, while the hosts are ninth with just 10 victories. However, Keçiörengücü has lost three of their last five outings, conceding 12 goals, which highlights defensive vulnerabilities. Amed demonstrates defensive stability, conceding only 2 goals in the last five games and dominating possession (53% vs 46%). Although the hosts possess a decent home record (46% win rate), the disparity in class and current momentum favors Amed, making them the clear favorite for this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KeçiörengücüAmed
14Shots8
KeçiörengücüAmed
4Shots on target2
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.43xG1.07
KeçiörengücüAmed
2Corners5
KeçiörengücüAmed
37Dangerous attacks58
KeçiörengücüAmed
12Fouls12
KeçiörengücüAmed
2Cards1
KeçiörengücüAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KeçiörengücüAmed
1.87Goals scored / match2.13
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.13Goals conceded / match1.11
KeçiörengücüAmed
48%Average possession53%
KeçiörengücüAmed
4.95Shots on target / match5.61
KeçiörengücüAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.28Shots per match15.5
KeçiörengücüAmed
4.95Shots on target5.61
KeçiörengücüAmed
14.1%Shot conversion13.8%
KeçiörengücüAmed
48%Possession53%
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.5xG for1.71
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.2xG against1.15
KeçiörengücüAmed

Shooting quality

Keçiörengücü: Efficient finishingAmed: Attacking
KeçiörengücüAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Keçiörengücü is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Keçiörengücü · 0.8 pts / match - Amed

Keçiörengücü
DLWWL
Season result split
41% W31% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-11
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-7-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.87 goals / match - Keçiörengücü · 2.13 goals / match - Amed

Keçiörengücü scoring profile: very strong

Keçiörengücü scores in 79% of matches (31 of 39 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 matches).

73Goals scored (season)81
KeçiörengücüAmed
44Goals conceded (season)42
KeçiörengücüAmed
3Average goals in match3.24
KeçiörengücüAmed
6Goals scored (last 5)7
KeçiörengücüAmed
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
KeçiörengücüAmed

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal84%
KeçiörengücüAmed
44%2 goals58%
KeçiörengücüAmed
31%3 goals29%
KeçiörengücüAmed
13%4 goals18%
KeçiörengücüAmed

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal66%
KeçiörengücüAmed
28%2 goals32%
KeçiörengücüAmed
8%3 goals11%
KeçiörengücüAmed
5%4 goals3%
KeçiörengücüAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
Keçiörengücü - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 39 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time26%
KeçiörengücüAmed
3%BTTS in both halves11%
KeçiörengücüAmed
33%Scored in both halves37%
KeçiörengücüAmed

BTTS and goal count

49%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
KeçiörengücüAmed
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
KeçiörengücüAmed
40%BTTS - last 580%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
KeçiörengücüAmed
51%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
KeçiörengücüAmed
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
KeçiörengücüAmed

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
KeçiörengücüAmed
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
KeçiörengücüAmed
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.71 pts / match - Amed

Keçiörengücü - half-time state
41% leading38% draw21% trailing
Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.71
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.1Goals scored (1st half)0.97
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.69Average goals (1st half)1.45
KeçiörengücüAmed
56%Clean sheet before half-time63%
KeçiörengücüAmed
36%No goal before half-time42%
KeçiörengücüAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.71
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)1.16
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.79
KeçiörengücüAmed
54%Clean sheet after half-time53%
KeçiörengücüAmed
51%No goal after half-time37%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Keçiörengücü - second-half results

26% W51% R23% P
63
Half-time points
43
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Keçiörengücü - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Keçiörengücü
ScoredConceded
12
10
0-15
13
9
16-30
18
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
10
5
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Keçiörengücü

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-25.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
170%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

KeçiörengücüLigaAmed
Average goals in match 3.002.92 3.24
Both teams scored 62%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 58%
Clean sheets 28%29% 34%
Goal before half-time 79%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 69%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Keçiörengücü 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
4 : 1
Keçiörengücü Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Keçiörengücü 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

Keçiörengücü score 1.87 goals per game on average and Amed 2.13. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Keçiörengücü's matches and 55% of Amed's.

What form are Keçiörengücü and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Keçiörengücü have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

The statistical background for Keçiörengücü vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.