Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 06 September 2026

Keçiörengücü vs Amed: match statistics

Keçiörengücü crest
Keçiörengücü
2 : 2half-time 1:2
Amed crest
Amed
130%(2.70)
X25%(3.40)
245%(2.20)

Amed is showing significantly better form over the last five matches (2.2 points per match) compared to Keçiörengücü (1.2 points per match), reflecting an unbeaten run of three wins and two draws. The visitors sit third in the table with 16 season wins, while the hosts are ninth with just 10 victories. However, Keçiörengücü has lost three of their last five outings, conceding 12 goals, which highlights defensive vulnerabilities. Amed demonstrates defensive stability, conceding only 2 goals in the last five games and dominating possession (53% vs 46%). Although the hosts possess a decent home record (46% win rate), the disparity in class and current momentum favors Amed, making them the clear favorite for this match.

Keçiörengücü vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Keçiörengücü played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Keçiörengücü: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Amed: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Keçiörengücü scores 1.89 and concedes 1.26 goals per match. Amed scores 2.07 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Keçiörengücü 70%, Amed 56%. Over 2.5: Keçiörengücü 63%, Amed 59%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.42. Keçiörengücü: 12.4 shots per match, Amed: 15.0.

Match halves

Keçiörengücü: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.74. Amed: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.15.

Goals by minute

Keçiörengücü: 31-45+ (13 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed is showing significantly better form over the last five matches (2.2 points per match) compared to Keçiörengücü (1.2 points per match), reflecting an unbeaten run of three wins and two draws. The visitors sit third in the table with 16 season wins, while the hosts are ninth with just 10 victories. However, Keçiörengücü has lost three of their last five outings, conceding 12 goals, which highlights defensive vulnerabilities. Amed demonstrates defensive stability, conceding only 2 goals in the last five games and dominating possession (53% vs 46%). Although the hosts possess a decent home record (46% win rate), the disparity in class and current momentum favors Amed, making them the clear favorite for this match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KeçiörengücüAmed
14Shots8
KeçiörengücüAmed
4Shots on target2
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.43xG1.07
KeçiörengücüAmed
2Corners5
KeçiörengücüAmed
37Dangerous attacks58
KeçiörengücüAmed
12Fouls12
KeçiörengücüAmed
2Cards1
KeçiörengücüAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.89Goals scored / match2.07
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.26Goals conceded / match1.11
KeçiörengücüAmed
46%Average possession53%
KeçiörengücüAmed
4.81Shots on target / match5.44
KeçiörengücüAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.41Shots per match15.04
KeçiörengücüAmed
4.81Shots on target5.44
KeçiörengücüAmed
15.2%Shot conversion13.8%
KeçiörengücüAmed
46%Possession53%
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.42xG for1.65
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.29xG against1.16
KeçiörengücüAmed

Shooting quality

Keçiörengücü: Counter-attackingAmed: Attacking
KeçiörengücüAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Keçiörengücü · 2.2 pts / match - Amed

Keçiörengücü
LWLLW
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-8
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Amed
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W22% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.89 goals / match - Keçiörengücü · 2.07 goals / match - Amed

Amed is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.26 goals / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.11 goals / match - Amed

Keçiörengücü scoring profile: very strong

Keçiörengücü scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

51Goals scored (season)56
KeçiörengücüAmed
34Goals conceded (season)30
KeçiörengücüAmed
3.15Average goals in match3.19
KeçiörengücüAmed
8Goals scored (last 5)12
KeçiörengücüAmed
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
KeçiörengücüAmed

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal81%
KeçiörengücüAmed
44%2 goals56%
KeçiörengücüAmed
33%3 goals26%
KeçiörengücüAmed
11%4 goals19%
KeçiörengücüAmed

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal67%
KeçiörengücüAmed
33%2 goals30%
KeçiörengücüAmed
7%3 goals11%
KeçiörengücüAmed
7%4 goals4%
KeçiörengücüAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

70%
Keçiörengücü - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 27 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time26%
KeçiörengücüAmed
4%BTTS in both halves7%
KeçiörengücüAmed
33%Scored in both halves33%
KeçiörengücüAmed

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
KeçiörengücüAmed
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
KeçiörengücüAmed
60%BTTS - last 540%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
KeçiörengücüAmed
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
KeçiörengücüAmed
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
KeçiörengücüAmed

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
KeçiörengücüAmed
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
KeçiörengücüAmed
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Keçiörengücü - half-time state
44% leading37% draw19% trailing
Amed - half-time state
44% leading41% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.74
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.15Goals scored (1st half)0.93
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.74Average goals (1st half)1.41
KeçiörengücüAmed
59%Clean sheet before half-time63%
KeçiörengücüAmed
33%No goal before half-time41%
KeçiörengücüAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.63
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)1.15
KeçiörengücüAmed
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
KeçiörengücüAmed
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.78
KeçiörengücüAmed
41%Clean sheet after half-time56%
KeçiörengücüAmed
52%No goal after half-time44%
KeçiörengücüAmed

Keçiörengücü - second-half results

19% W56% R26% P
46
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 37%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

44% W30% R26% P
47
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.74
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Keçiörengücü - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Keçiörengücü
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
9
6
16-30
13
3
31-45
5
4
46-60
8
4
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
7
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
11
1
46-60
5
7
61-75
15
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Keçiörengücü

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
162%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

KeçiörengücüLigaAmed
Average goals in match 3.152.96 3.19
Both teams scored 70%51% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%55% 59%
Clean sheets 22%28% 33%
Goal before half-time 81%72% 70%
Goal after half-time 74%82% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KeçiörengücüGoalMame Biram DioufAssist: Hüseyin Bulut
  2. AmedYellow cardCem Üstündag
  3. AmedSubstitutionOn: Hasan Ali KaldırımOff: Oguzhan Matur
  4. AmedSubstitutionOn: Tarkan SerbestOff: Cem Üstündag
  5. KeçiörengücüYellow cardOkwuchukwu Francis Ezeh
  6. KeçiörengücüSubstitutionOn: Enes YılmazOff: Hakan Bilgiç
  7. KeçiörengücüYellow cardOğuzcan Çalışkan
  8. KeçiörengücüGoalOdise RoshiAssist: Mame Biram Diouf
  9. AmedSubstitutionOn: Florent HasaniOff: Dia Sabi'A

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Keçiörengücü 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
4 : 1
Keçiörengücü Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Keçiörengücü 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

Keçiörengücü score 1.89 goals per game on average and Amed 2.07. The 1. Lig average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Keçiörengücü's matches and 56% of Amed's.

What form are Keçiörengücü and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Keçiörengücü have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Amed 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Keçiörengücü vs Amed?

The statistical background for Keçiörengücü vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.