Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK: match statistics
Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Keçiörengücü played Manisa BBSK in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Keçiörengücü: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Manisa BBSK: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Keçiörengücü scores 1.86 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Manisa BBSK scores 1.42 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Keçiörengücü 61%, Manisa BBSK 50%. Over 2.5: Keçiörengücü 58%, Manisa BBSK 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Keçiörengücü has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.27. Keçiörengücü: 12.7 shots per match, Manisa BBSK: 11.1.
Match halves
Keçiörengücü: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.81. Manisa BBSK: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Keçiörengücü: 31-45+ (16 goals). Manisa BBSK: 61-75 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win because Keçiörengücü averages 2.11 goals scored and concedes only 0.78 per match at home, while Manisa BBSK records 1.11 scored and 1.78 conceded away. The hosts create more chances — on average 14.22 shots and 5.22 on target per home game with a 15% conversion, whereas the visitors average 10.44 shots, 3.56 on target and an 11% conversion. Note also the xG: Keçiörengücü has an average home xG of 1.61, Manisa has xG 1.18 away, and this season the hosts have scored 67 goals versus 51 for the visitors, confirming offensive superiority. Defensively the gap is significant — the hosts register 44% clean sheets and only 17% home losses, while Manisa have 28% clean sheets away and 50% away losses. Considering higher quality chances, better conversion and a favorable home goal difference (+24 vs -12 for the visitors), I assign 66% to the hosts, 20% for a draw and 14% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project No BTTS as more likely, primarily due to Keçiörengücü's excellent defensive form: in their last 5 matches Keçiörengücü have 0% BTTS, scored 11 and conceded only 1 (0.2 goals conceded per game). Manisa have 20% BTTS in their last 5 matches and average 1.0 goal, while seasonally they score 1.11 goals with xG_for 1.18 and just 3.56 shots on target, indicating limited away attacking threat. Seasonal indicators are mixed – Keçiörengücü have a seasonal BTTS of 44% versus Manisa’s 56%, and the league average BTTS is 50%, but the league features 57% clean sheets, with hosts keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches (guests 28%), which favors the No BTTS option. Considering xG (home 1.37 vs away 1.18), advantage in shots on target (5.17 vs 3.56) and Keçiörengücü’s recent run (0.2 goals conceded on average), I assess the probability of No BTTS at 62% and BTTS at 38%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The analysis is based on xG and seasonal averages: Keçiörengücü scores on average 1.72 goals per season (xG 1.37), while Manisa concedes on average 1.78 goals (xG against 1.69), so I estimate an expected 1.60 goals for the home side. Manisa averages 1.11 goals per season (xG 1.18), and Keçiörengücü concedes 1.22, which after accounting for recent form yields 1.25 expected goals for the away side; the combined expectation is 2.85 goals. Seasonal over-1.5 rates are 72% for the home team and 78% for the away team, and a Poisson model with lambda=2.85 gives P(over 1.5) ≈78% and P(over 2.5) ≈54%, supporting a higher probability of more than 1.5 goals. Additionally, Keçiörengücü averages 5.17 shots on target versus Manisa’s 3.56 and has scored 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches (11 goals), therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time) because Keçiörengücü has superior season numbers: they average 1.72 goals per match versus Manisa’s 1.11 and concede 1.22 compared to 1.78 for their opponents. In the first half the hosts score 0.67 on average and led at the break in 33% of matches (40% in the last 5), while Manisa average 0.5 first-half goals and lead at the break in only 22% of cases. After the break Keçiörengücü are even stronger — they score 1.06 goals on average in second halves versus Manisa’s 0.61; the hosts win 50% of second halves and achieve an average of 1.78 points in second halves, which increases the chance of maintaining or extending a lead. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (5.17 vs 3.56) and have a higher xG (1.37 vs 1.18), while Manisa concedes on average 1.00 goal after the break, so the strongest signal is 1/1 (28%), with alternatives X/1 at 21% and X/X at 13%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Keçiörengücü | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Keçiörengücü is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.8 pts / match - Manisa BBSK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Keçiörengücü is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.86 goals / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.42 goals / match - Manisa BBSK
Keçiörengücü is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.5 goals / match - Manisa BBSK
Keçiörengücü scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Manisa BBSK keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
Manisa BBSK scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Keçiörengücü
Over / Under - Manisa BBSK
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Keçiörengücü is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / match - Keçiörengücü · 1.28 pts / match - Manisa BBSK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Keçiörengücü - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Manisa BBSK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Keçiörengücü
Manisa BBSK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Keçiörengücü | Liga | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 2.92 | • 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 29% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 80% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Keçiörengücü 0 - 1 - 0 Manisa BBSK. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
The 1. Lig match finished Keçiörengücü 2:1 Manisa BBSK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
Keçiörengücü score 1.86 goals per game on average and Manisa BBSK 1.42. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Keçiörengücü's matches and 50% of Manisa BBSK's.
What form are Keçiörengücü and Manisa BBSK in?
Over the last 5 games Keçiörengücü have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Manisa BBSK 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
The statistical background for Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


