Kedus Giorgis vs Adama Kenema: match statistics
Kedus Giorgis vs Adama Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kedus Giorgis played Adama Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Kedus Giorgis: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Adama Kenema: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kedus Giorgis scores 0.85 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Adama Kenema scores 0.89 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kedus Giorgis 35%, Adama Kenema 44%. Over 2.5: Kedus Giorgis 23%, Adama Kenema 30%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Kedus Giorgis has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.14. Kedus Giorgis: 9.4 shots per match, Adama Kenema: 6.3.
Match halves
Kedus Giorgis: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.35. Adama Kenema: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Kedus Giorgis: 31-45+ (7 goals). Adama Kenema: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kedus Giorgis has the edge in chance creation and quality of play at home — averaging 8.92 shots per match and 2.67 on target with xG 1.34, versus 6.18 shots, 2.64 on target and xG 1.10 for Adama Kenema away. Defensively the hosts are stronger: they concede 0.67 goals per home match, while the visitors concede 1.00 goals on the road; in the last 5 fixtures the visitors have conceded 10 goals and collected 0 points, whereas Kedus scored 6 goals in that period and averages 1.4 points per match. Adama Kenema compensates with high shot efficiency (19%) and 61% possession, which translates into 1.08 goals away and makes them dangerous from limited opportunities; the visitors rarely finish matches goalless (only 15% of games without a goal). Both teams record many draws (Kedus 42% draws at home, Adama 46% draws away), which increases the likelihood of a split of points, but the hosts’ defensive advantage and superior form prevail. Based on this, I forecast a home win: 55% for 1, 30% for X and 15% for 2.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis highlights a BTTS - Yes signal: in the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS in 60% of games (Kedus 60%, Adama 60%), and Adama's season BTTS rate is 62%. Defenses are prone to conceding — Adama conceded an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches (10 goals conceded), while Kedus conceded 1.4 goals in that period (7 goals conceded). Offensive xG is 1.17 for Kedus and 1.10 for Adama (total ≈2.27 xG), average on-target shots are 3.0 vs 2.64, and shot conversion is 10% for the home side versus 19% for the away side, increasing Adama’s chance to score. A counterargument is that Kedus has a season 50% clean sheets at home and the home side’s season BTTS is only 29%, which reduces BTTS probability when viewed across the season. Considering the strong signal from the last 5 matches, Adama’s high season BTTS of 62%, the combined xG ≈2.27 and the average goals conceded by the visitors, I assess BTTS probability at 62% vs 38% and recommend the pick 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a low-scoring game: average xG is 1.17 for Kedus Giorgis and 1.10 for Adama Kenema, yielding expected goals of about 1.19 for the home side and 1.15 for the away side (total 2.34). Both teams rarely play over 2.5 goals this season — hosts have 29% of matches over 2.5, visitors 31%, and the league only 28% over 2.5 — which strongly supports Under 2.5. Additionally, season-long Under 2.5 rates are 71% for the home team and 69% for the away team, and low shot metrics (7.29 vs 6.18) and shots on target (3.0 vs 2.64) limit scoring potential despite higher conversion for the visitors (19% vs 10%). However, the last 5 matches show a reverse short-term trend (60% Over 2.5 for both sides), and Adama Kenema conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per game), increasing the likelihood of exceeding 1.5 goals. Weighing the stronger seasonal and league signals (71%/69% Under 2.5 and league 28% Over 2.5), I recommend an Under on the 2.5 line as the strongest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X): hosts record a draw at the break in 50% of matches and visitors in 69% (approximately 60% on average), while seasonal draw rates are 43% for hosts and 46% for visitors, indicating a strong propensity for draws. The league has a low goals-per-game average of 1.8, and hosts score only 0.14 goals on average by half-time versus 0.54 for away teams, so the first half is likely to be low-scoring and favor a draw. Visitors have a higher season-long goals average (1.08) compared to hosts (0.71), but they are in terrible form (last 5 matches: lllll, last5_winPercentage_overall_away 0%), whereas hosts went llwwd in their last 5, which reduces the likelihood of a confident away win. Hosts also tend to score very late (6 goals in mins 76–90 for hosts vs 2 for visitors), so some half-time draws may turn into home wins, but combining HT statistics and seasonal draw rates, the strongest scenario is X/X (draw/draw).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kedus Giorgis | Adama Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Adama Kenema is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
0.85 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis · 0.89 goals / match - Adama Kenema
Kedus Giorgis is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.92 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis · 1 goals / match - Adama Kenema
Kedus Giorgis scores in 54% of matches (14 of 26 matches), while Adama Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).
Adama Kenema scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kedus Giorgis
Over / Under - Adama Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kedus Giorgis is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis · 1.04 pts / match - Adama Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kedus Giorgis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Adama Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kedus Giorgis
Adama Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kedus Giorgis | Liga | Adama Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.77 | 1.79 | • 1.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 42% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 39% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 59% | • 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Kedus GiorgisGoalFitsum Tilahun
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kedus Giorgis 0 - 0 - 1 Adama Kenema. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kedus Giorgis vs Adama Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Kedus Giorgis 1:0 Adama Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kedus Giorgis vs Adama Kenema?
Kedus Giorgis score 0.85 goals per game on average and Adama Kenema 0.89. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Kedus Giorgis's matches and 44% of Adama Kenema's.
What form are Kedus Giorgis and Adama Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Kedus Giorgis have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Adama Kenema 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kedus Giorgis vs Adama Kenema?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


