Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Kedus Giorgis crest
Kedus Giorgis
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kedus Giorgis played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kedus Giorgis: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kedus Giorgis scores 0.75 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.76 and concedes 0.52. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kedus Giorgis 29%, Mebrat Hayl 24%. Over 2.5: Kedus Giorgis 17%, Mebrat Hayl 20%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Kedus Giorgis has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.15. Kedus Giorgis: 9.5 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.2.

Match halves

Kedus Giorgis: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.29. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Kedus Giorgis: 31-45+ (6 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mebrat Hayl sit 4th in the table while Kedus Giorgis are 17th. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 8 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have managed only 2 goals and 0.8 points per game. Defensively Kedus concede on average 0.64 goals per home match and keep 45% clean sheets, but in their last five fixtures the hosts have conceded as many as 7 goals, while Mebrat have conceded only 3. Kedus nevertheless create slightly better chances at home: average xG 1.33 per match, 8.82 shots and 2.55 shots on target, versus Mebrat’s xG 1.18, 7.33 shots and 2.08 shots on target, with comparable conversion rates of 9% versus 10%. The visitors show better form and efficiency recently (3 wins and 1 draw in the last 5) and a higher league position, which together with the recent goal balance (8 vs 2) gives them a clear advantage. Taking into account the form advantage, goals scored in the last 5 matches and league position, I forecast an away win, although the hosts’ higher xG and superior defensive organisation at home reduce the likelihood of a loss to a possible draw or narrow defeat.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 23% for Kedus Giorgis and 25% for Mebrat Hayl, averaging 24% — well below the league average of 41%, which initially favors a 'No Goal' scenario. Additionally, the home side have a clean sheet in 69% of matches and the visitors in 50%; seasonal goals per game are only 0.77 (home) and 0.75 (away), indicating limited attacking propensity from both teams. Shot counts of 7.25 and 7.33 with shots on target 2.33 and 2.08 and conversion rates of 11% and 10% confirm low finishing efficiency. Recent-form asymmetry over the last 5 matches is clear: the visitors scored 8 goals (1.6 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6), while the hosts scored 2 (0.4) and conceded 7 (1.4), so any goal is more likely to come from Mebrat Hayl. Although xG are 1.11 (Kedus) and 1.18 (Mebrat), actual goal averages are lower (0.77 and 0.75), therefore I rate BTTS - No at 70% and BTTS - Yes at 30%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams are low-scoring: the hosts average 0.77 goals per match, the guests 0.75, while the league average is only 1.77 goals per match. xG stands at 1.11 for Kedus Giorgis and 1.18 for Mebrat Hayl, but with shot conversion rates of 11% (hosts) and 10% (guests) and a high clean sheet rate for the hosts at 69% (guests 50%), actual finishing should be lower than xG alone suggests. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored only 2 goals (0.4 avg), while the guests have scored 8 goals (1.6 avg), so I expect most goals to come from the visitors, but the match total will remain low — I project about 0.70 goals for the hosts and 0.90 for the guests (total ~1.60). Season over 2.5 rates are 23% for the hosts and 17% for the guests (league 27%), and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is only 23%/25%, which further reduces the likelihood of three or more goals (I estimate Over 2.5 at ~22%). Based on this, the strongest signal is Under 2.5 — the low expected total (~1.60 goals), the hosts’ high clean sheet rate of 69% and low conversion justify the Under side as the recommended bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal statistics strongly indicate a draw at half-time: hosts were level at the break in 77% of matches, visitors in 67%, giving on average about a 72% chance of a draw after 45 minutes; additionally hosts score an average of 0.15 goals by half-time and visitors 0.42, so the first act is often low-scoring. In the second half hosts have a clear advantage – they score 0.62 on average and concede 0.23, while visitors score 0.33 and concede 0.50, which suggests that from an even score hosts are more likely to improve the result. Moreover hosts collect on average 1.85 points per match over the season versus 1.17 for visitors and have won 46% of matches against 25% for the visitors, which increases the probability that they will win the match if the score is level at half-time. Despite the visitors’ shorter good run in the last 5 fixtures (visitors have 60% wins and 60% leads at half-time), their weaker second-half figures (0.33 scored and 0.50 conceded) and lower seasonal points averages support a turnaround by the hosts. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1) — I estimate it at 40% probability, with 23% for draw/draw (X/X) and 9% for draw and an away win (X/2); the remaining combinations are less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
10Shots8
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
4Shots on target2
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.43xG1.22
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1Corners2
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
71Dangerous attacks79
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
-1Fouls-1
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
-1Cards-1
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.75Goals scored / match0.76
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.88Goals conceded / match0.52
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
52%Average possession53%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
3.25Shots on target / match2.08
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.46Shots per match7.16
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
3.25Shots on target2.08
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
7.9%Shot conversion10.6%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
52%Possession53%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.36xG for1.15
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.12xG against1.12
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Kedus Giorgis: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)34%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis · 2 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis
LDLLW
Season result split
29% W29% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-10
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
LWWWD
Season result split
36% W44% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-5
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis · 0.52 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis scoring profile: more difficult

Kedus Giorgis scores in 50% of matches (12 of 24 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 44% of matches (11 of 25 matches), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

18Goals scored (season)19
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
21Goals conceded (season)13
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.63Average goals in match1.28
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
2Goals scored (last 5)8
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal44%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
13%2 goals20%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%3 goals8%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
4%4 goals4%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal40%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
13%2 goals12%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
4%3 goals0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%Scored in both halves12%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

8%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
20%BTTS - last 540%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time28%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kedus Giorgis is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis · 1.2 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis - half-time state
29% leading46% draw25% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
16% leading72% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.2
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.28
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.16
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.44
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
67%Clean sheet before half-time88%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
67%No goal before half-time84%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.79Average goals (2nd half)0.84
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
58%Clean sheet after half-time72%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
75%No goal after half-time60%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis - second-half results

21% W42% R38% P
32
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

28% W56% R16% P
30
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kedus Giorgis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.80
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+6-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kedus Giorgis
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
1
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
8
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
28%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kedus Giorgis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kedus GiorgisLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.631.78 1.28
Both teams scored 29%41% 24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%27% 20%
Clean sheets 29%40% 60%
Goal before half-time 58%54% 28%
Goal after half-time 63%58% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kedus Giorgis 0 - 0 - 1 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Kedus Giorgis 2:1 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

Kedus Giorgis score 0.75 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.76. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Kedus Giorgis's matches and 24% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Kedus Giorgis and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Kedus Giorgis have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.