Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus: match statistics

Kendal Tornado crest
Kendal Tornado
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Persiku Kudus crest
Persiku Kudus
165%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Kendal Tornado presents impressive form at their home stadium with a 67% win rate and a +5 goal difference in home matches. The hosts have not lost a match at home this season, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games and scoring an average of 2 goals per match. Conversely, Persiku Kudus performs very poorly on the road, losing 75% of away matches and holding a negative goal difference (-2). The guests' away form is alarming – a streak of five consecutive losses (wllllllw) and a high rate of goals conceded (1.75 per match) indicate serious defensive problems. Kendal Tornado's advantage in possession (58% vs 56%), shot accuracy (15% vs 13%), and higher xG value (1.78 vs 1.06) further support the prediction of a home victory.

Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kendal Tornado played Persiku Kudus in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Kendal Tornado: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Persiku Kudus: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kendal Tornado scores 1.83 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Persiku Kudus scores 1.38 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kendal Tornado 50%, Persiku Kudus 56%. Over 2.5: Kendal Tornado 67%, Persiku Kudus 63%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.07. Kendal Tornado: 8.8 shots per match, Persiku Kudus: 7.6.

Match halves

Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.17. Persiku Kudus: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (3 goals). Persiku Kudus: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kendal Tornado presents impressive form at their home stadium with a 67% win rate and a +5 goal difference in home matches. The hosts have not lost a match at home this season, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games and scoring an average of 2 goals per match. Conversely, Persiku Kudus performs very poorly on the road, losing 75% of away matches and holding a negative goal difference (-2). The guests' away form is alarming – a streak of five consecutive losses (wllllllw) and a high rate of goals conceded (1.75 per match) indicate serious defensive problems. Kendal Tornado's advantage in possession (58% vs 56%), shot accuracy (15% vs 13%), and higher xG value (1.78 vs 1.06) further support the prediction of a home victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
8Shots5
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
3Shots on target3
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1.05xG0.79
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
2Corners2
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
46Dangerous attacks36
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
-1Fouls-1
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
2Cards3
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1.83Goals scored / match1.38
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1Goals conceded / match1.75
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
47%Average possession49%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
5Shots on target / match3.19
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.83Shots per match7.63
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
5Shots on target3.19
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
20.8%Shot conversion18%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
47%Possession49%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1.54xG for1.07
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1.01xG against1.42
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Shooting quality

Kendal Tornado: Counter-attackingPersiku Kudus: Efficient finishing
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
Accuracy (shots on target)57%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kendal Tornado is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.4 pts / match - Persiku Kudus

Kendal Tornado
DWWLW
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
DWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Persiku Kudus
DLLWW
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-10
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-6
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kendal Tornado is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.38 goals / match - Persiku Kudus

Kendal Tornado is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.75 goals / match - Persiku Kudus

Kendal Tornado scoring profile: very strong

Kendal Tornado scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Persiku Kudus keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Persiku Kudus scoring profile: strong

Persiku Kudus scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

11Goals scored (season)22
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
6Goals conceded (season)28
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
2.83Average goals in match3.13
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
11Goals scored (last 5)9
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal69%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
50%2 goals38%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
33%3 goals19%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
33%4 goals13%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal88%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
17%2 goals50%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
17%3 goals25%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0%4 goals13%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time19%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
33%Scored in both halves25%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
60%BTTS - last 580%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kendal Tornado is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.38 pts / match - Persiku Kudus

Kendal Tornado - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Persiku Kudus - half-time state
31% leading44% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.38
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.06
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
100%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
50%No goal before half-time56%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
2.17Average goals (2nd half)2.06
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
33%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus
50%No goal after half-time50%
Kendal TornadoPersiku Kudus

Kendal Tornado - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persiku Kudus - second-half results

25% W19% R56% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kendal Tornado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Persiku Kudus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kendal Tornado
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Persiku Kudus
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kendal Tornado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Persiku Kudus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

Kendal TornadoLigaPersiku Kudus
Average goals in match 2.832.62 3.13
Both teams scored 50%48% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%46% 63%
Clean sheets 33%29% 13%
Goal before half-time 50%69% 69%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Persiku KudusYellow cardAhmad Subagja Baasith
  2. Kendal TornadoYellow cardKushedya Yudo
  3. Kendal TornadoYellow cardBayu Mohamad Fiqri
  4. Persiku KudusYellow cardJaimerson da Silva Xavier
  5. Persiku KudusYellow cardDavid Maulana
  6. Persiku KudusSubstitutionOn: Sandi Darma SuteOff: David Maulana

FAQ

What was the result of Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?

The Liga 2 match finished Kendal Tornado 0:0 Persiku Kudus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?

Kendal Tornado score 1.83 goals per game on average and Persiku Kudus 1.38. The Liga 2 average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kendal Tornado's matches and 56% of Persiku Kudus's.

What form are Kendal Tornado and Persiku Kudus in?

Over the last 5 games Kendal Tornado have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Persiku Kudus 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?

The statistical background for Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.