Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: match statistics
Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kendal Tornado played PSS Sleman in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kendal Tornado: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. PSS Sleman: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kendal Tornado scores 1.82 and concedes 0.64 goals per match. PSS Sleman scores 1.86 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kendal Tornado 36%, PSS Sleman 62%. Over 2.5: Kendal Tornado 64%, PSS Sleman 57%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.34. Kendal Tornado: 9.6 shots per match, PSS Sleman: 10.6.
Match halves
Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.27. PSS Sleman: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.14.
Goals by minute
Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (7 goals). PSS Sleman: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kendal Tornado show strong home form: 0 defeats, 67% wins, only 0.33 GA per match and 67% CS, indicating exceptional defense. PSS Sleman lead the league with an impressive goal tally (39) and consistent away scoring (avg 1.9), but their away xG (1.19) is lower than Kendal’s home xG (1.58). Both teams have similar possession (53%) and identical last-5 PPG (2.2), suggesting a balanced match. Due to the hosts’ flawless home run and outstanding defensive form I give them a slight edge. Nevertheless PSS’s offensive capability makes a draw or narrow away win realistic scenarios.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season stats point to moderately high BTTS: Kendal Tornado season BTTS 55%, PSS Sleman 70%, league 48%, supporting Both Teams To Score. Hosts have better defense (GA 0.55 vs 0.9) and higher xG_for (1.43 vs 1.19), but visitors show greater finishing and total goals (gf 39), raising offensive pressure. Hosts’ last5 BTTS dropped (20%) with low ga_l5 (1.0), suggesting capacity to keep a clean sheet. Similar shots and SoT give visitors chances despite home defense. Given balance between away offensive strength and season BTTS tendency, project BTTS = YES.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Model expects ~2.20 xG total (1.20 home, 1.00 away) based on attack and defense xG. High season Over 1.5 percentages (73% home, 90% away) and strong Over 0.5 and BTTS figures suggest at least two goals. Both teams generate similar shot volumes and SOT (~10 shots, ~4.8 SOT) with ~18% conversion, increasing scoring likelihood. Hosts have better season defense but visitors score more overall, balancing expectations. The most reliable and strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Analysis shows PSS Sleman often leads at half-time (higher GoalsHT and leadingAtHTPercentage_away), while Kendal Tornado are significantly stronger in the second half (higher AVG_2hg_home, ppg_2hg_home and high wins_2hg_percentage_home). Kendal also has a very high home win rate, suggesting the ability to overturn results after the break. Many matches finish level at HT (large drawingAtHTPercentage and last5_draws HT), but the final result favors the hosts. The most likely scenario is draw at HT and Kendal Tornado win FT (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kendal Tornado | PSS Sleman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.64 goals / match - Kendal Tornado · 0.71 goals / match - PSS Sleman
Kendal Tornado scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).
PSS Sleman scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
Over / Under - PSS Sleman
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.91 pts / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.71 pts / match - PSS Sleman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PSS Sleman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kendal Tornado
PSS Sleman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Kendal Tornado | Liga | PSS Sleman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.45 | 2.64 | • 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 49% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 55% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 45% | 68% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kendal Tornado 1 - 0 - 0 PSS Sleman. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
The Liga 2 match finished Kendal Tornado 1:1 PSS Sleman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
Kendal Tornado score 1.82 goals per game on average and PSS Sleman 1.86. The Liga 2 average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Kendal Tornado's matches and 62% of PSS Sleman's.
What form are Kendal Tornado and PSS Sleman in?
Over the last 5 games Kendal Tornado have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and PSS Sleman 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.