KFUM vs HamKam: match statistics
KFUM vs HamKam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KFUM played HamKam in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 1 November 2026. Venue: KFUM Arena. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
KFUM: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. HamKam: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
KFUM scores 1.25 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. HamKam scores 1.38 and concedes 2.13. League average: 3.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KFUM 63%, HamKam 58%. Over 2.5: KFUM 58%, HamKam 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
HamKam has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.23. KFUM: 10.5 shots per match, HamKam: 10.8.
Match halves
KFUM: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. HamKam: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.96.
Goals by minute
KFUM: 16-30 (7 goals). HamKam: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-1. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KFUM enter the match on the back of three wins and two draws in their last five games, while HamKam have won two and lost three. The hosts scored 10 goals and conceded 5 during that spell, compared with 8 scored and 10 conceded by the visitors, pointing to greater consistency from KFUM. Particularly significant is the defensive gap in the teams’ respective home and away settings: KFUM concede an average of 1.17 goals at home, while HamKam concede as many as 2.25 on the road. The visitors have lost 58% of their away matches and kept a clean sheet in just 8%, although their average of 1.33 goals scored away from home gives them a chance of finding the net. With attacking xG almost identical — 1.19 for KFUM at home and 1.18 for HamKam away — the pick of the hosts is driven primarily by their current form and stronger defensive record.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have scored in 58% of their matches, providing a solid basis for BTTS - Yes. KFUM average 1.42 goals at home, while HamKam concede 2.25 goals away, making a home goal likely. The visitors average 1.33 goals away, while KFUM concede 2.00 at home; the hosts’ xG conceded is also 1.79, pointing to chances for HamKam. In their last five matches, both teams scored in 80% of KFUM’s games, but in only 40% of HamKam’s, and HamKam failed to score in 33% of their away matches. Therefore, the case for BTTS - Yes is not particularly strong.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
At least two goals were scored in 92% of matches involving these teams, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal in the data. KFUM score an average of 1.42 goals per match, while HamKam concede 2.25; meanwhile, the visitors score 1.33 goals, and the hosts concede 2.00. The percentages of matches with at least three goals also point to an open game: 67% for KFUM and 83% for HamKam, although this line is less certain. In their last five matches, KFUM averaged 2.0 goals scored, while HamKam averaged 2.0 goals conceded, further supporting the Over 1.5 pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is KFUM leading at the break and holding that advantage through to the final whistle: HamKam were trailing at half-time in 58% of their matches, while KFUM were ahead in 33%. The visitors concede an average of 1.08 goals before half-time, compared with 0.67 for the hosts, pointing to an early KFUM advantage. The hosts’ recent form also supports a home win: they have won three of their last five matches and have not lost any, while HamKam have suffered three defeats. Over this period, KFUM scored an average of 2.0 goals per match compared with HamKam’s 1.6, and scored 1.2 goals after the break, while the visitors conceded 1.2. A half-time draw remains a significant alternative, as HamKam went into the break level in three of their last five matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KFUM | HamKam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KFUM is 267% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - KFUM · 0.6 pts / match - HamKam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HamKam is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - KFUM · 1.38 goals / match - HamKam
KFUM is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.63 goals / match - KFUM · 2.13 goals / match - HamKam
KFUM scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
HamKam scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KFUM
Over / Under - HamKam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KFUM is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - KFUM · 0.92 pts / match - HamKam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KFUM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
HamKam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KFUM
HamKam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| KFUM | Liga | HamKam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.88 | 3.25 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 80% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): KFUM 1 - 3 - 1 HamKam. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KFUM vs HamKam?
The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 2:2 HamKam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KFUM and HamKam?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches KFUM won 1, HamKam won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs HamKam?
KFUM score 1.25 goals per game on average and HamKam 1.38. The Eliteserien average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KFUM's matches and 58% of HamKam's.
What form are KFUM and HamKam in?
Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and HamKam 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs HamKam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.