Norway - EliteserienData current as of 23 July 2026

KFUM vs Viking: match statistics

KFUM crest
KFUM
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Viking crest
Viking

KFUM vs Viking: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KFUM play Viking in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

KFUM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Viking: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KFUM scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Viking scores 2.58 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KFUM 46%, Viking 58%. Over 2.5: KFUM 54%, Viking 75%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Viking has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.26. KFUM: 10.6 shots per match, Viking: 15.3.

Match halves

KFUM: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38. Viking: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

KFUM: 0-15 (3 goals). Viking: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 0-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Match description

Viking is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table versus KFUM’s 10th and have 19 goals this season compared to KFUM’s 9 at home. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 14 goals and won 5 of 5, while KFUM have scored 6 goals and have a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, translating to an average of 3.0 points per match for Viking versus 1.0 point for KFUM. Viking create significantly more chances (on average 17.33 shots and 5.0 on target per match vs 11.0 shots and 3.67 on target for the home side) and have a higher xG (1.83 vs 1.29), confirming better quality of chances. KFUM, however, defend well at home — conceding only 0.67 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of home appearances, and they have not failed to score in any home match (0% matches without a goal), which may limit the number of goals. Considering Viking’s advantage in goals, xG and chance creation, I tip an away win, although I expect a relatively low-scoring game.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
KFUMViking
1Shots12
KFUMViking
0Shots on target4
KFUMViking
0.26xG1.69
KFUMViking
4Corners6
KFUMViking
25Dangerous attacks90
KFUMViking
13Fouls2
KFUMViking
3Cards0
KFUMViking

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match2.58
KFUMViking
1.62Goals conceded / match1
KFUMViking
47%Average possession51%
KFUMViking
4.15Shots on target / match5.58
KFUMViking

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.62Shots per match15.33
KFUMViking
4.15Shots on target5.58
KFUMViking
9.4%Shot conversion16.8%
KFUMViking
47%Possession51%
KFUMViking
1.26xG for1.77
KFUMViking
1.49xG against1.16
KFUMViking

Shooting quality

KFUM: BalancedViking: Attacking
KFUMViking
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Viking is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KFUM · 2.4 pts / match - Viking

KFUM
LWDLL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Viking
WWWLW
Season result split
83% W0% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-0-2
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Viking is 158% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - KFUM · 2.58 goals / match - Viking

Viking is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - KFUM · 1 goals / match - Viking

KFUM scoring profile: strong

KFUM scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Viking keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Viking scoring profile: very strong

Viking scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

13Goals scored (season)31
KFUMViking
21Goals conceded (season)12
KFUMViking
2.62Average goals in match3.58
KFUMViking
4Goals scored (last 5)12
KFUMViking
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
KFUMViking

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal92%
KFUMViking
31%2 goals75%
KFUMViking
0%3 goals42%
KFUMViking
0%4 goals25%
KFUMViking

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal67%
KFUMViking
69%2 goals25%
KFUMViking
15%3 goals8%
KFUMViking
8%4 goals0%
KFUMViking

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time33%
KFUMViking
15%BTTS in both halves8%
KFUMViking
15%Scored in both halves75%
KFUMViking

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
KFUMViking
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KFUMViking
40%BTTS - last 560%
KFUMViking

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KFUMViking
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
KFUMViking
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time42%
KFUMViking

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
KFUMViking
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KFUMViking
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KFUMViking

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Viking is 165% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - KFUM · 2.25 pts / match - Viking

KFUM - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing
Viking - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)2.25
KFUMViking
0.62Goals scored (1st half)1.42
KFUMViking
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
KFUMViking
1.69Average goals (1st half)2.08
KFUMViking
31%Clean sheet before half-time58%
KFUMViking
46%No goal before half-time8%
KFUMViking

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.83
KFUMViking
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
KFUMViking
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KFUMViking
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KFUMViking
54%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KFUMViking
69%No goal after half-time25%
KFUMViking

KFUM - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
11
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Viking - second-half results

42% W58% R0% P
27
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KFUM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Viking - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Viking
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
6
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Viking

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
222%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

KFUMLigaViking
Average goals in match 2.622.95 3.58
Both teams scored 46%55% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%57% 75%
Clean sheets 31%24% 33%
Goal before half-time 85%82% 100%
Goal after half-time 62%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KFUM 0 - 1 - 3 Viking. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

KFUM Fotball
2 : 2
Viking FK
Viking FK
3 : 1
KFUM Fotball
Viking
1 : 0
KFUM
KFUM
1 : 2
Viking

FAQ

What was the result of KFUM vs Viking?

The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 0:2 Viking. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KFUM and Viking?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KFUM won 0, Viking won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs Viking?

KFUM score 1.00 goals per game on average and Viking 2.58. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 46% of KFUM's matches and 58% of Viking's.

What form are KFUM and Viking in?

Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Viking 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs Viking?

The statistical background for KFUM vs Viking — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.