Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics
Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kheybar Khorramabad played Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 4 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Kheybar Khorramabad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kheybar Khorramabad scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.82 and concedes 1.09. League average: 1.87 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kheybar Khorramabad 55%, Shams Azar Qazvin 45%. Over 2.5: Kheybar Khorramabad 36%, Shams Azar Qazvin 18%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 26%.
xG, shots and style
Kheybar Khorramabad has higher xG: 1.15 vs 0.98. Kheybar Khorramabad: 0.7 shots per match, Shams Azar Qazvin: 5.8.
Match halves
Kheybar Khorramabad: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.55. Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Kheybar Khorramabad: 31-45+ (3 goals). Shams Azar Qazvin: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.87 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 26%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kheybar Khorramabad | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.58 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Kheybar Khorramabad · 0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Kheybar Khorramabad · 0.82 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Kheybar Khorramabad is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Kheybar Khorramabad · 1.09 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Kheybar Khorramabad scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Kheybar Khorramabad keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kheybar Khorramabad
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Kheybar Khorramabad · 0.73 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kheybar Khorramabad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kheybar Khorramabad
Shams Azar Qazvin
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Kheybar Khorramabad | Liga | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.87 | • 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 41% | ▲ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 26% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 38% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 58% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 65% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Kheybar Khorramabad 0:0 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
Kheybar Khorramabad score 1.00 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.82. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Kheybar Khorramabad's matches and 45% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.
What form are Kheybar Khorramabad and Shams Azar Qazvin in?
Over the last 5 games Kheybar Khorramabad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kheybar Khorramabad vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.