Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueVið DjúpumýrarData current as of 23 July 2026

KÍ vs AB: match statistics

KÍ crest
2 : 1half-time 2:0
AB crest
AB

KÍ vs AB: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KÍ play AB in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The match date is 25 May 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Við Djúpumýrar. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KÍ: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. AB: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KÍ scores 1.94 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. AB scores 1.38 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KÍ 63%, AB 56%. Over 2.5: KÍ 44%, AB 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

KÍ has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.28. KÍ: 15.7 shots per match, AB: 9.5.

Match halves

KÍ: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.81. AB: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

KÍ: 31-45+ (9 goals). AB: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Faroe Islands Premier League: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

KÍ has a clear defensive and form advantage: at home they concede an average of 0.5 goals per match and have 50% clean sheets, while AB concedes 1.6 goals on the road and has only 20% clean sheets. In attack the hosts score 2.0 goals per home game on average and have netted 12 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have only 1.0 goal away and 5 goals in their last five. In terms of chance quality (xG) both teams are similar (KÍ xG 1.27 vs AB xG 1.29), but KÍ converts much better — 22% shot conversion at home versus 9% for the visitors, with an average of 9 shots for the hosts and 11 shots for AB. Form confirms the hosts' edge: KÍ's last 5 matches show 3 wins and 2 draws with 2.2 points per game, while AB have not won any of their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering lower goals conceded, higher offensive efficiency and KÍ's unbeaten home record (0% losses), I favor a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
AB
17Shots8
AB
4Shots on target3
AB
1.94xG1.02
AB
8Corners1
AB
81Dangerous attacks40
AB
6Fouls10
AB
2Cards4
AB

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.94Goals scored / match1.38
AB
0.75Goals conceded / match1.56
AB
61%Average possession50%
AB
5.56Shots on target / match4.06
AB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.69Shots per match9.5
AB
5.56Shots on target4.06
AB
12.4%Shot conversion14.5%
AB
61%Possession50%
AB
1.94xG for1.28
AB
1.08xG against1.68
AB

Shooting quality

: DominantAB: Efficient finishing
AB
Accuracy (shots on target)35%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AB is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - KÍ · 1.8 pts / match - AB

WWDLD
Season result split
50% W44% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-1
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
AB
WWLWL
Season result split
38% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-8
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - KÍ · 1.38 goals / match - AB

KÍ is 108% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - KÍ · 1.56 goals / match - AB

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

AB scoring profile: very strong

AB scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)22
AB
12Goals conceded (season)25
AB
2.69Average goals in match2.94
AB
8Goals scored (last 5)8
AB
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
AB

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal81%
AB
50%2 goals38%
AB
25%3 goals19%
AB
25%4 goals0%
AB

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
AB
6%2 goals50%
AB
0%3 goals19%
AB
0%4 goals13%
AB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time25%
AB
0%BTTS in both halves6%
AB
25%Scored in both halves31%
AB

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
AB
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AB
60%BTTS - last 560%
AB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AB
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
AB
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AB

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
AB
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
AB
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
AB

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / match - KÍ · 1.44 pts / match - AB

KÍ - half-time state
50% leading38% draw13% trailing
AB - half-time state
44% leading13% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per match (1st half)1.44
AB
1.13Goals scored (1st half)0.75
AB
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
AB
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
AB
69%Clean sheet before half-time38%
AB
38%No goal before half-time38%
AB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AB
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
AB
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
AB
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.44
AB
63%Clean sheet after half-time44%
AB
63%No goal after half-time50%
AB

KÍ - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AB - second-half results

44% W19% R38% P
23
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KÍ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
AB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

AB
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

AB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaAB
Average goals in match 2.692.80 2.94
Both teams scored 63%54% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%51% 56%
Clean sheets 31%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%69% 100%
Goal after half-time 63%78% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: 0 - 1 - 0 AB. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs AB?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 2:1 AB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs AB?

KÍ score 1.94 goals per game on average and AB 1.38. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KÍ's matches and 56% of AB's.

What form are KÍ and AB in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and AB 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs AB?

The statistical background for KÍ vs AB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.