Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

KÍ vs B68: match statistics

KÍ crest
6 : 1half-time 3:0
B68 crest
B68

KÍ vs B68: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KÍ play B68 in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 19:30. Final score: 6:1.

Current form

KÍ: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. B68: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KÍ scores 1.94 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. B68 scores 1.06 and concedes 2.19. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KÍ 63%, B68 50%. Over 2.5: KÍ 44%, B68 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

KÍ has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.24. KÍ: 15.7 shots per match, B68: 10.1.

Match halves

KÍ: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.81. B68: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

KÍ: 31-45+ (9 goals). B68: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Faroe Islands Premier League: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 3-1-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back a KÍ win because the hosts display a significantly superior defense: KÍ concedes on average 0.5 goals at home and has 50% clean sheets, whereas B68 concedes on average 4.0 goals away and has not recorded a single clean sheet. Additionally, B68 have yet to score on the road (0.0 goals average, away shutout rate 100%), while KÍ average 1.0 goals at home with an 18% conversion rate and 5.5 shots per game. xG metrics show B68 generate 1.45 xG away while conceding 1.68 xG, indicating vulnerability to high-quality chances, whereas KÍ register 0.79 xG at home and concede 1.00 xG, suggesting the hosts have been more efficient in converting the chances available. In the last 5 matches KÍ scored 8 goals and have a 3-0-2 record, averaging 2.2 points per game, while B68 in their last 5 matches have only one win, three losses and averaged 0.8 points per game while conceding 12 goals. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 80% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 5% for an away win.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
B68
11Shots3
B68
7Shots on target2
B68
1.69xG0.57
B68
7Corners2
B68
70Dangerous attacks31
B68
10Fouls8
B68
2Cards2
B68

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.94Goals scored / match1.06
B68
0.75Goals conceded / match2.19
B68
61%Average possession47%
B68
5.56Shots on target / match3.31
B68

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.69Shots per match10.06
B68
5.56Shots on target3.31
B68
12.4%Shot conversion10.6%
B68
61%Possession47%
B68
1.94xG for1.24
B68
1.08xG against1.75
B68

Shooting quality

: DominantB68: Balanced
B68
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KÍ is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - KÍ · 0.2 pts / match - B68

WWDLD
Season result split
50% W44% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-1
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
B68
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W19% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-10
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - KÍ · 1.06 goals / match - B68

KÍ is 192% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - KÍ · 2.19 goals / match - B68

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while B68 keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

B68 scoring profile: strong

B68 scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)17
B68
12Goals conceded (season)35
B68
2.69Average goals in match3.25
B68
8Goals scored (last 5)4
B68
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
B68

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal56%
B68
50%2 goals31%
B68
25%3 goals13%
B68
25%4 goals6%
B68

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal94%
B68
6%2 goals50%
B68
0%3 goals25%
B68
0%4 goals25%
B68

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time13%
B68
0%BTTS in both halves6%
B68
25%Scored in both halves19%
B68

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
B68
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
B68
60%BTTS - last 520%
B68

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
B68
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
B68
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
B68

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
B68
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
B68
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
B68

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 132% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / match - KÍ · 0.81 pts / match - B68

KÍ - half-time state
50% leading38% draw13% trailing
B68 - half-time state
19% leading25% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per match (1st half)0.81
B68
1.13Goals scored (1st half)0.38
B68
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
B68
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.25
B68
69%Clean sheet before half-time31%
B68
38%No goal before half-time75%
B68

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.06
B68
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
B68
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
B68
1.19Average goals (2nd half)2
B68
63%Clean sheet after half-time31%
B68
63%No goal after half-time50%
B68

KÍ - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

B68 - second-half results

25% W31% R44% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KÍ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
B68 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

B68
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

B68

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaB68
Average goals in match 2.692.80 3.25
Both teams scored 63%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%51% 50%
Clean sheets 31%28% 6%
Goal before half-time 75%69% 81%
Goal after half-time 63%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): 3 - 1 - 0 B68. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

B68
1 : 4
B68 Toftir
3 : 3
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
7 : 0
B68 Toftir
B68 Toftir
0 : 2
KÍ Klaksvík

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs B68?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 6:1 B68. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and B68?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KÍ won 3, B68 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs B68?

KÍ score 1.94 goals per game on average and B68 1.06. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KÍ's matches and 50% of B68's.

What form are KÍ and B68 in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and B68 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs B68?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.