Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

KÍ vs B68: match statistics

KÍ crest
6 : 1half-time 3:0
B68 crest
B68

KÍ vs B68: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KÍ played B68 in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 6:1.

Current form

KÍ: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. B68: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

KÍ scores 1.75 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. B68 scores 0.75 and concedes 2.75. League average: 2.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KÍ 50%, B68 50%. Over 2.5: KÍ 25%, B68 75%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

KÍ has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.35. KÍ: 11.5 shots per match, B68: 10.3.

Match halves

KÍ: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 0.75. B68: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

KÍ: 46-60 (3 goals). B68: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Faroe Islands Premier League: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a KÍ win because the hosts display a significantly superior defense: KÍ concedes on average 0.5 goals at home and has 50% clean sheets, whereas B68 concedes on average 4.0 goals away and has not recorded a single clean sheet. Additionally, B68 have yet to score on the road (0.0 goals average, away shutout rate 100%), while KÍ average 1.0 goals at home with an 18% conversion rate and 5.5 shots per game. xG metrics show B68 generate 1.45 xG away while conceding 1.68 xG, indicating vulnerability to high-quality chances, whereas KÍ register 0.79 xG at home and concede 1.00 xG, suggesting the hosts have been more efficient in converting the chances available. In the last 5 matches KÍ scored 8 goals and have a 3-0-2 record, averaging 2.2 points per game, while B68 in their last 5 matches have only one win, three losses and averaged 0.8 points per game while conceding 12 goals. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 80% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 5% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick BTTS - No. Main reason is the visitors’ poor attacking output: only 3 goals this season (0.0 per match) and 4 goals in the last 5 fixtures (0.8 per match). The home side display strong form both offensively and defensively: 8 goals in their last 5 matches (1.6 per match) and only 2 conceded (0.4 per match), with recent xG of 1.71 (xG created) versus 0.93 (xG allowed). Although the homes’ season BTTS rate is 100%, the visitors’ overall record remains weak — they concede an average of 4.0 goals per match this season (11 conceded). In the last 5 matches visitors generate 1.49 xG with xG against 1.84, but their shot conversion rate is 0% compared to the hosts’ 17%, limiting their ability to turn chances into goals. Considering the visitors’ 0.8 average goals in the last 5 and the hosts’ just 0.4 conceded in the same period, I assess BTTS No at 65% versus 35% for Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Model xG projects 1.46 for KÍ (attacking xG 1.24 vs B68 defensive xG 1.68) and 1.72 for B68 (attacking xG 1.45 vs KÍ defensive xG 1.99), totaling 3.18 expected goals. That is above the league average of 2.55 goals/match and Poisson estimates translate to roughly an 83% chance of Over 1.5 and ~62% for Over 2.5. In their last 5 matches KÍ scored 8 goals (1.6 avg) while B68 conceded 12 goals (2.4 avg), reinforcing the likelihood of a goal-rich game. Season stats show both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, with KÍ at 100% of matches >2.5 and an average of 4.5 on-target shots per team. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal — the high expected total of 3.18 goals and an 83% probability provide the best value.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KÍ has a clear efficiency advantage: on the season they average 1.5 goals per game and 0.5 goals by half-time, while B68 have 0.0 goals for the season and 0.0 by half-time; additionally B68 concede on average 4.0 goals per game and 1.5 before the break. In the last 5 matches KÍ has averaged 1.6 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, recorded 60% wins and led at the break in 60% of cases, whereas B68 over the same period have 0.8 goals scored and 2.4 conceded and only 20% leads at the break. Although xG is 1.24 for KÍ versus 1.45 for B68, the home side convert better (shot conversion rate 17% versus 0% for the visitors) and average 9 shots per match with 4.5 on target, while the visitors have 11.5 shots and also 4.5 on target, which suggests wasted chances by B68. Minute-by-minute stats show KÍ can threaten early (1 goal in minutes 0–15), while B68 concede particularly in minutes 31–45 (2 goals) and 76–90 (3 goals), supporting a half-time lead for the hosts and maintenance of the result. Therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (44%), other realistic options are X/1 (17%) and X/X (12%), hence my pick is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
B68
11Shots3
B68
7Shots on target2
B68
1.69xG0.57
B68
7Corners2
B68
70Dangerous attacks31
B68
10Fouls8
B68
2Cards2
B68

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match0.75
B68
0.5Goals conceded / match2.75
B68
57%Average possession42%
B68
5.75Shots on target / match4.5
B68

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match10.25
B68
5.75Shots on target4.5
B68
15.2%Shot conversion7.3%
B68
57%Possession42%
B68
1.63xG for1.35
B68
0.93xG against1.83
B68

Shooting quality

: Efficient finishingB68: Balanced
B68
Accuracy (shots on target)50%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KÍ is 167% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KÍ · 0.75 pts / match - B68

WDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 25%
B68
LWLL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 133% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - KÍ · 0.75 goals / match - B68

KÍ is 450% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - KÍ · 2.75 goals / match - B68

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while B68 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

B68 scoring profile: mixed

B68 scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)3
B68
2Goals conceded (season)11
B68
2.25Average goals in match3.5
B68
7Goals scored (last 5)3
B68
2Goals conceded (last 5)11
B68

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal50%
B68
25%2 goals25%
B68
25%3 goals0%
B68
25%4 goals0%
B68

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
B68
0%2 goals75%
B68
0%3 goals25%
B68
0%4 goals25%
B68

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
B68
0%BTTS in both halves0%
B68
25%Scored in both halves25%
B68

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
B68
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
B68
50%BTTS - last 550%
B68

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
B68
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
B68
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
B68

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
B68
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
B68
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
B68

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.5 pts / match - KÍ · 0.75 pts / match - B68

KÍ - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing
B68 - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.5Points per match (1st half)0.75
B68
1Goals scored (1st half)0.25
B68
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
B68
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
B68
100%Clean sheet before half-time25%
B68
25%No goal before half-time75%
B68

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)0.5
B68
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
B68
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.75
B68
1.25Average goals (2nd half)2.25
B68
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
B68
75%No goal after half-time50%
B68

KÍ - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

B68 - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KÍ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.501.25
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal75%50%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal25%75%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
B68 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.750.50
Goals scored / match0.30.5
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.32.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%0%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

B68
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

B68

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaB68
Average goals in match 2.252.43 3.50
Both teams scored 50%48% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%52% 75%
Clean sheets 50%33% 0%
Goal before half-time 75%67% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%76% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. B68Yellow cardLatif Ahmed
  2. Yellow cardJean Carlos de Brito
  3. SubstitutionOn: Dávid ReynheimOff: Patrik Johannesen
  4. B68SubstitutionOn: Fríði PetersenOff: Latif Ahmed
  5. B68Yellow cardHanus Höjgaard
  6. B68SubstitutionOn: Ramzi ToureOff: Djóni Samuelsen
  7. SubstitutionOn: Jonn JohannesenOff: Filip Brattbakk

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): 2 - 1 - 0 B68. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

B68 Toftir
3 : 3
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
7 : 0
B68 Toftir
B68 Toftir
0 : 2
KÍ Klaksvík

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs B68?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 6:1 B68. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and B68?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KÍ won 2, B68 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs B68?

KÍ score 1.75 goals per game on average and B68 0.75. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of KÍ's matches and 50% of B68's.

What form are KÍ and B68 in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and B68 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs B68?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.