Kitayosce vs Azam: match statistics
Kitayosce vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kitayosce play Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 8 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Azam scores 1.52 and concedes 0.41. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kitayosce 33%, Azam 17%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, Azam 34%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Azam has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.25. Kitayosce: 6.2 shots per match, Azam: 10.2.
Match halves
Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Azam: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Azam is a narrow favorite based on superior season metrics – 28 goals scored versus Kitayosce’s 23 and only 5 conceded compared to the opponent’s 19, which clearly indicates the visitors’ stronger defense. In the last 5 matches Azam scored 7 goals and averages 2.2 points per game, while Kitayosce scored 6 goals and averages 2.0 points, so form is comparable, but Azam remains unbeaten away (0% losses). The visitors also have better attacking efficiency: conversion 16% versus 12%, on average 9 shots and 2.9 on target per match with 54% possession, versus 8.67 shots, 2.67 on target and 48% for the hosts. On the other hand the home side defends very well at home (on average 0.4 goals conceded and 80% of matches with a clean sheet) and win 50% of home matches, so a draw is still a realistic outcome. Considering the overall numbers (28–23 in goals, 5–19 in conceded and 0% away losses), I assign a higher probability to an Azam victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kitayosce | Azam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Azam is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce · 2.4 pts / match - Azam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.52 goals / match - Azam
Azam is 127% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.41 goals / match - Azam
Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).
Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kitayosce
Over / Under — Azam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.86 pts / match - Azam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kitayosce
Azam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Kitayosce | Liga | Azam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.03 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 40% | 39% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 39% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 60% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kitayosce 0 - 0 - 1 Azam. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kitayosce vs Azam?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 4:1 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Azam?
Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Azam 1.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitayosce's matches and 17% of Azam's.
What form are Kitayosce and Azam in?
Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Azam 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Azam?
The statistical background for Kitayosce vs Azam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.