Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 08 September 2026

Kitayosce vs KMC: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
3 : 0half-time 3:0
KMC crest
KMC
170%(2.27)
X20%(2.48)
210%(3.77)

Kitayosce clearly outperforms KMC in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain unbeaten in home matches (67% draws, 33% wins), while keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and conceding an average of just 0.67 goals per game. KMC presents catastrophic away form – they have lost all of their last four away matches and have not achieved any victory this season away from home (100% losses). The visitors have scored barely 0.25 goals on average per away match with 75% of matches without scoring a goal, which, given Kitayosce's solid defense, gives the hosts a huge advantage. The difference in goal difference (+1 for Kitayosce in home matches vs -8 for KMC in away matches) and the form of the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) unequivocally point to a home victory.

Kitayosce vs KMC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce played KMC in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 23 January 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Kitayosce: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. KMC: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.00 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. KMC scores 0.22 and concedes 1.56. League average: 1.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 43%, KMC 11%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 43%, KMC 33%. League level: BTTS 26%, Over 2.5 26%.

xG, shots and style

KMC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 0.90. Kitayosce: 4.6 shots per match, KMC: 6.1.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.43. KMC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.11.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (4 goals). KMC: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.73 goals per match, BTTS 26%, Over 2.5 26%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce clearly outperforms KMC in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain unbeaten in home matches (67% draws, 33% wins), while keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and conceding an average of just 0.67 goals per game. KMC presents catastrophic away form – they have lost all of their last four away matches and have not achieved any victory this season away from home (100% losses). The visitors have scored barely 0.25 goals on average per away match with 75% of matches without scoring a goal, which, given Kitayosce's solid defense, gives the hosts a huge advantage. The difference in goal difference (+1 for Kitayosce in home matches vs -8 for KMC in away matches) and the form of the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) unequivocally point to a home victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
KitayosceKMC
12Shots7
KitayosceKMC
2Shots on target2
KitayosceKMC
1.27xG0.96
KitayosceKMC
5Corners3
KitayosceKMC
53Dangerous attacks52
KitayosceKMC
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceKMC
-1Cards-1
KitayosceKMC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.22
KitayosceKMC
0.86Goals conceded / match1.56
KitayosceKMC
35%Average possession39%
KitayosceKMC
1.14Shots on target / match2.33
KitayosceKMC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.57Shots per match6.11
KitayosceKMC
1.14Shots on target2.33
KitayosceKMC
21.9%Shot conversion3.6%
KitayosceKMC
35%Possession39%
KitayosceKMC
0.9xG for1.43
KitayosceKMC
1.2xG against1.47
KitayosceKMC

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingKMC: Balanced
KitayosceKMC
Accuracy (shots on target)25%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.880.09

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.2 pts / match - KMC

Kitayosce
DWLLW
Season result split
29% W43% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
KMC
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W11% D78% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-7
0.44 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 355% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.22 goals / match - KMC

Kitayosce is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.56 goals / match - KMC

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 22% of matches (2 of 9 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

7Goals scored (season)2
KitayosceKMC
6Goals conceded (season)14
KitayosceKMC
1.86Average goals in match1.78
KitayosceKMC
5Goals scored (last 5)1
KitayosceKMC
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
KitayosceKMC

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal22%
KitayosceKMC
29%2 goals0%
KitayosceKMC
14%3 goals0%
KitayosceKMC
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceKMC

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal78%
KitayosceKMC
29%2 goals33%
KitayosceKMC
0%3 goals33%
KitayosceKMC
0%4 goals11%
KitayosceKMC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time11%
KitayosceKMC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceKMC
0%Scored in both halves0%
KitayosceKMC

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
KitayosceKMC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
KitayosceKMC
40%BTTS - last 520%
KitayosceKMC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

14%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
KitayosceKMC
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KitayosceKMC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceKMC

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
KitayosceKMC
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
KitayosceKMC
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
KitayosceKMC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.56 pts / match - KMC

Kitayosce - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
KMC - half-time state
0% leading56% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.56
KitayosceKMC
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0.11
KitayosceKMC
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KitayosceKMC
0.29Average goals (1st half)0.89
KitayosceKMC
86%Clean sheet before half-time44%
KitayosceKMC
86%No goal before half-time89%
KitayosceKMC

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.78
KitayosceKMC
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.11
KitayosceKMC
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
KitayosceKMC
1Average goals (2nd half)0.78
KitayosceKMC
57%Clean sheet after half-time56%
KitayosceKMC
71%No goal after half-time89%
KitayosceKMC

Kitayosce - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KMC - second-half results

11% W44% D44% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.56
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
13%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
34%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 57% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
37%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaKMC
Average goals in match 1.861.73 1.78
Both teams scored 43%26% 11%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%26% 33%
Clean sheets 43%46% 22%
Goal before half-time 14%43% 56%
Goal after half-time 57%53% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.73
Average goals per match
26%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.60
Away goals / match
+88%
Home attack advantage
+47%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
43%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs KMC?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 3:0 KMC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs KMC?

Kitayosce score 1.00 goals per game on average and KMC 0.22. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Kitayosce's matches and 11% of KMC's.

What form are Kitayosce and KMC in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KMC 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs KMC?

The statistical background for Kitayosce vs KMC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.