Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 17 October 2026

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce played Mbeya City in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kitayosce: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mbeya City: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Mbeya City scores 0.69 and concedes 1.31. League average: 1.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 40%, Mbeya City 31%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, Mbeya City 31%. League level: BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 26%.

xG, shots and style

Mbeya City has higher xG: 1.10 vs 1.00. Kitayosce: 5.8 shots per match, Mbeya City: 5.2.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.40. Mbeya City: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.23.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (5 goals). Mbeya City: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.76 goals per match, BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 26%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
KitayosceMbeya City
3Shots8
KitayosceMbeya City
0Shots on target2
KitayosceMbeya City
0.75xG1.42
KitayosceMbeya City
3Corners2
KitayosceMbeya City
75Dangerous attacks104
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Cards-1
KitayosceMbeya City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KitayosceMbeya City
1.1Goals scored / match0.69
KitayosceMbeya City
0.9Goals conceded / match1.31
KitayosceMbeya City
38%Average possession36%
KitayosceMbeya City
1.7Shots on target / match1.77
KitayosceMbeya City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.8Shots per match5.15
KitayosceMbeya City
1.7Shots on target1.77
KitayosceMbeya City
19%Shot conversion13.4%
KitayosceMbeya City
38%Possession36%
KitayosceMbeya City
1xG for1.1
KitayosceMbeya City
1.2xG against1.62
KitayosceMbeya City

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingMbeya City: Counter-attacking
KitayosceMbeya City
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.650.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.4 pts / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce
LWWLD
Season result split
30% W40% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
DDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mbeya City
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W31% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-7
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.69 goals / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.31 goals / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Mbeya City scoring profile: mixed

Mbeya City scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

11Goals scored (season)9
KitayosceMbeya City
9Goals conceded (season)17
KitayosceMbeya City
2Average goals in match2
KitayosceMbeya City
8Goals scored (last 5)3
KitayosceMbeya City
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal46%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%2 goals15%
KitayosceMbeya City
20%3 goals8%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal77%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%2 goals46%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%3 goals8%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

28%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time23%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Scored in both halves15%
KitayosceMbeya City

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
KitayosceMbeya City
60%BTTS - last 560%
KitayosceMbeya City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
KitayosceMbeya City
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceMbeya City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KitayosceMbeya City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce - half-time state
10% leading70% draw20% trailing
Mbeya City - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
KitayosceMbeya City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.46
KitayosceMbeya City
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
KitayosceMbeya City
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.15
KitayosceMbeya City
70%Clean sheet before half-time46%
KitayosceMbeya City
80%No goal before half-time62%
KitayosceMbeya City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)0.85
KitayosceMbeya City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.23
KitayosceMbeya City
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
KitayosceMbeya City
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.85
KitayosceMbeya City
60%Clean sheet after half-time54%
KitayosceMbeya City
70%No goal after half-time77%
KitayosceMbeya City

Kitayosce - second-half results

20% W50% D30% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mbeya City - second-half results

15% W38% D46% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.80.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 45% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaMbeya City
Average goals in match▲ 2.001.76▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 40%28%▲ 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 40%26%▲ 31%
Clean sheets▼ 40%44%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%47%▲ 69%
Goal after half-time▲ 60%56%▲ 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.76
Average goals per match
28%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / match
0.56
Away goals / match
+114%
Home attack advantage
+53%
Home defence advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
47%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 0:2 Mbeya City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Mbeya City 0.69. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Kitayosce's matches and 31% of Mbeya City's.

What form are Kitayosce and Mbeya City in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mbeya City 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.