Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 23 July 2026

Kitayosce vs Namungo: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Namungo crest
Namungo
150%(2.15)
X30%(2.75)
220%(3.75)

Kitayosce presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and only a 20% loss rate at their own stadium, recording a positive goal difference of +2. The hosts maintain high defensive efficiency with a 60% clean sheet rate at home, conceding an average of just 0.8 goals per home match. Namungo, on the other hand, performs much worse as the visiting team - a mere 13% away win rate, a negative goal difference of -5, and a staggering 50% loss rate. The visitors have failed to register a single win in their last five matches, averaging only 0.6 PPG. Considering the home form advantage of the hosts and Namungo's poor away disposition, a Kitayosce win is the most probable outcome, although a draw is also on the cards given the hosts' recent run of results.

Kitayosce vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce play Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 11 March 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Namungo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.86 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 33%, Namungo 48%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, Namungo 24%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Namungo has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.25. Kitayosce: 6.2 shots per match, Namungo: 8.9.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Namungo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitayosce presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and only a 20% loss rate at their own stadium, recording a positive goal difference of +2. The hosts maintain high defensive efficiency with a 60% clean sheet rate at home, conceding an average of just 0.8 goals per home match. Namungo, on the other hand, performs much worse as the visiting team - a mere 13% away win rate, a negative goal difference of -5, and a staggering 50% loss rate. The visitors have failed to register a single win in their last five matches, averaging only 0.6 PPG. Considering the home form advantage of the hosts and Namungo's poor away disposition, a Kitayosce win is the most probable outcome, although a draw is also on the cards given the hosts' recent run of results.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KitayosceNamungo
7Shots11
KitayosceNamungo
3Shots on target2
KitayosceNamungo
1.19xG1.33
KitayosceNamungo
5Corners4
KitayosceNamungo
74Dangerous attacks68
KitayosceNamungo
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceNamungo
-1Cards-1
KitayosceNamungo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.1Goals scored / match0.86
KitayosceNamungo
0.93Goals conceded / match1.07
KitayosceNamungo
42%Average possession47%
KitayosceNamungo
2.27Shots on target / match3.31
KitayosceNamungo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.23Shots per match8.86
KitayosceNamungo
2.27Shots on target3.31
KitayosceNamungo
17.6%Shot conversion9.7%
KitayosceNamungo
42%Possession47%
KitayosceNamungo
1.25xG for1.33
KitayosceNamungo
1.3xG against1.33
KitayosceNamungo

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingNamungo: Balanced
KitayosceNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Namungo is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.8 pts / match - Namungo

Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Namungo
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W45% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-13-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.86 goals / match - Namungo

Kitayosce is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.07 goals / match - Namungo

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: mixed

Namungo scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

33Goals scored (season)25
KitayosceNamungo
28Goals conceded (season)31
KitayosceNamungo
2.03Average goals in match1.93
KitayosceNamungo
2Goals scored (last 5)6
KitayosceNamungo
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
KitayosceNamungo

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal66%
KitayosceNamungo
30%2 goals17%
KitayosceNamungo
17%3 goals3%
KitayosceNamungo
7%4 goals0%
KitayosceNamungo

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal69%
KitayosceNamungo
27%2 goals24%
KitayosceNamungo
10%3 goals14%
KitayosceNamungo
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time21%
KitayosceNamungo
0%BTTS in both halves3%
KitayosceNamungo
13%Scored in both halves10%
KitayosceNamungo

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
KitayosceNamungo
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
KitayosceNamungo
20%BTTS - last 560%
KitayosceNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
KitayosceNamungo
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
KitayosceNamungo
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KitayosceNamungo

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
KitayosceNamungo
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
KitayosceNamungo
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
KitayosceNamungo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.07 pts / match - Namungo

Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
17% leading55% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.07
KitayosceNamungo
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.41
KitayosceNamungo
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
KitayosceNamungo
1Average goals (1st half)0.9
KitayosceNamungo
60%Clean sheet before half-time55%
KitayosceNamungo
67%No goal before half-time66%
KitayosceNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.31
KitayosceNamungo
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
KitayosceNamungo
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
KitayosceNamungo
0.9Average goals (2nd half)1.03
KitayosceNamungo
67%Clean sheet after half-time62%
KitayosceNamungo
67%No goal after half-time59%
KitayosceNamungo

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaNamungo
Average goals in match 2.032.17 1.93
Both teams scored 33%35% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 24%
Clean sheets 43%39% 31%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 59%
Goal after half-time 57%63% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitayosce 0 - 1 - 0 Namungo. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 2:0 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Namungo?

Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.86. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitayosce's matches and 48% of Namungo's.

What form are Kitayosce and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Namungo 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Namungo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.