Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 17 October 2026

Kitayosce vs Namungo: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Namungo crest
Namungo
150%(2.15)
X30%(2.75)
220%(3.75)

Kitayosce presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and only a 20% loss rate at their own stadium, recording a positive goal difference of +2. The hosts maintain high defensive efficiency with a 60% clean sheet rate at home, conceding an average of just 0.8 goals per home match. Namungo, on the other hand, performs much worse as the visiting team - a mere 13% away win rate, a negative goal difference of -5, and a staggering 50% loss rate. The visitors have failed to register a single win in their last five matches, averaging only 0.6 PPG. Considering the home form advantage of the hosts and Namungo's poor away disposition, a Kitayosce win is the most probable outcome, although a draw is also on the cards given the hosts' recent run of results.

Kitayosce vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce played Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 11 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kitayosce: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Namungo: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.15 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.93 and concedes 0.93. League average: 1.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 38%, Namungo 47%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 46%, Namungo 13%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Namungo has higher xG: 1.15 vs 0.96. Kitayosce: 5.0 shots per match, Namungo: 6.7.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.46. Namungo: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (5 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.90 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce presents solid home form with a 40% win rate and only a 20% loss rate at their own stadium, recording a positive goal difference of +2. The hosts maintain high defensive efficiency with a 60% clean sheet rate at home, conceding an average of just 0.8 goals per home match. Namungo, on the other hand, performs much worse as the visiting team - a mere 13% away win rate, a negative goal difference of -5, and a staggering 50% loss rate. The visitors have failed to register a single win in their last five matches, averaging only 0.6 PPG. Considering the home form advantage of the hosts and Namungo's poor away disposition, a Kitayosce win is the most probable outcome, although a draw is also on the cards given the hosts' recent run of results.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KitayosceNamungo
7Shots11
KitayosceNamungo
3Shots on target2
KitayosceNamungo
1.19xG1.33
KitayosceNamungo
5Corners4
KitayosceNamungo
74Dangerous attacks68
KitayosceNamungo
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceNamungo
-1Cards-1
KitayosceNamungo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.15Goals scored / match0.93
KitayosceNamungo
1.15Goals conceded / match0.93
KitayosceNamungo
37%Average possession44%
KitayosceNamungo
1.38Shots on target / match2.6
KitayosceNamungo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5Shots per match6.67
KitayosceNamungo
1.38Shots on target2.6
KitayosceNamungo
23.1%Shot conversion14%
KitayosceNamungo
37%Possession44%
KitayosceNamungo
0.96xG for1.15
KitayosceNamungo
1.3xG against1.18
KitayosceNamungo

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingNamungo: Counter-attacking
KitayosceNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)28%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.830.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.6 pts / match - Namungo

Kitayosce
LDLLW
Season result split
31% W31% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-5
1.23 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Namungo
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W40% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.93 goals / match - Namungo

Namungo is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.93 goals / match - Namungo

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: very strong

Namungo scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

15Goals scored (season)14
KitayosceNamungo
15Goals conceded (season)14
KitayosceNamungo
2.31Average goals in match1.87
KitayosceNamungo
5Goals scored (last 5)5
KitayosceNamungo
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
KitayosceNamungo

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal80%
KitayosceNamungo
31%2 goals13%
KitayosceNamungo
23%3 goals0%
KitayosceNamungo
8%4 goals0%
KitayosceNamungo

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal67%
KitayosceNamungo
38%2 goals13%
KitayosceNamungo
8%3 goals13%
KitayosceNamungo
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time7%
KitayosceNamungo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceNamungo
8%Scored in both halves0%
KitayosceNamungo

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS7%
KitayosceNamungo
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KitayosceNamungo
40%BTTS - last 580%
KitayosceNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
KitayosceNamungo
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
KitayosceNamungo
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceNamungo

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
KitayosceNamungo
15%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
KitayosceNamungo
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
KitayosceNamungo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Namungo is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.07 pts / match - Namungo

Kitayosce - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.07
KitayosceNamungo
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.33
KitayosceNamungo
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
KitayosceNamungo
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.73
KitayosceNamungo
62%Clean sheet before half-time60%
KitayosceNamungo
77%No goal before half-time73%
KitayosceNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.67
KitayosceNamungo
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
KitayosceNamungo
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
KitayosceNamungo
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.13
KitayosceNamungo
46%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KitayosceNamungo
69%No goal after half-time47%
KitayosceNamungo

Kitayosce - second-half results

23% W38% D38% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Namungo - second-half results

47% W27% D27% L
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaNamungo
Average goals in match▲ 2.311.90• 1.87
Both teams scored▲ 38%31%▲ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 46%30%▼ 13%
Clean sheets▼ 31%42%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 54%51%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 69%58%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.90
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / match
0.70
Away goals / match
+71%
Home attack advantage
+42%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Chamou Karaboue⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KitayosceGoalChamou Karaboue

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 2:0 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Namungo?

Kitayosce score 1.15 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.93. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kitayosce's matches and 47% of Namungo's.

What form are Kitayosce and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Namungo 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Namungo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.