Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics
Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kitayosce played Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Kitayosce: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kitayosce scores 1.06 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 1.06 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kitayosce 28%, Pamba Jiji 33%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 39%, Pamba Jiji 44%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.02. Kitayosce: 5.2 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 5.3.
Match halves
Kitayosce: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.44. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.39.
Goals by minute
Kitayosce: 0-15 (6 goals). Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 1.97 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) — Kitayosce possess a clear defensive edge at home, conceding just 0.44 goals per match and keeping clean sheets in 78% of games, whereas Pamba Jiji concede 1.13 goals on average away and have only a 38% clean sheet rate. Offensively the hosts score 1.11 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.20 and a 12% conversion rate, while the visitors manage only 0.63 goals away with xG 1.08 and a 10% conversion, indicating finishing issues. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 4 goals each, but Kitayosce conceded 3 and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (averaging 1.6 points per game), whereas Pamba Jiji conceded 6 and had 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per game). Although the visitors have higher possession (59% vs 47%) and more shots on target per match (3.67 vs 2.5), their high share of goalless away games (63%) and lower conversion rate make them less threatening going forward. Based on this I estimate probabilities at 60% for a home win, 25% for a draw and 15% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Kitayosce average 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match this season, while Pamba Jiji records only 0.63 goals scored and 1.13 conceded per match. Season BTTS rates are 40% for the home side and 25% for the visitors, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches versus 38% for Pamba, indicating a defensive edge for the home team. In the last 5 matches the hosts had BTTS 0%, scored a total of 4 goals (0.8 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6), while the visitors in their last 5 also scored 4 (0.8) but conceded 6 (1.2) and had 40% BTTS. Looking at xG and shots: hosts xG 1.35 versus xG against Pamba 1.12, and Pamba register more shots on target 3.67 vs 2.88, but with lower conversion 10% vs 20% for the hosts, which suggests the visitors create chances but fail to convert. Overall I assess 'BTTS - No' as more likely (70%) than 'Yes' (30%), due to the hosts' 0% BTTS in the last 5, the visitors' low scoring average of 0.63 and the hosts' 50% clean sheets.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kitayosce averages 1.4 goals per match, Pamba Jiji 0.63; their xG are 1.35 (Kitayosce) and 1.08 (Pamba), total xG = 2.43, which indicates a moderate scoring game. The home side attempts more shots (7.5 vs 6.5) and has higher conversion (20% vs 10%), with Kitayosce conceding 0.8 goals per match and Pamba 1.13; clean sheets occur in 50% and 38% of matches respectively. Based on xG and seasonal averages (1.4 vs 0.63) I estimate about 1.30 goals for the home team and 1.10 for the away, total 2.40 expected goals. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 70% for Kitayosce and 63% for Pamba, therefore I assign Over 1.5 a high probability of 76%; Over 2.5 shows a weaker signal (50%/38% -> average ~44% and xG 2.43 just below 2.5) hence Over 2.5 ~48% vs Under 52%, while Over 3.5 is unlikely (10%/0% -> ~11%). As a result the best line to play is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) as the strongest signal derived from xG, the hosts' higher conversion and high seasonal Over 1.5 percentages.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics suggest a draw at half-time: the home side have 63% of matches level at the break, the visitors 57%, with average first-half goals 0.63 for Kitayosce and 0.29 for Pamba Jiji. After the break the home advantage is pronounced — Kitayosce score on average 0.88 goals in the second half and collect 1.75 points in second halves, whereas Pamba Jiji record 0.00 goals and 0.43 points in second halves. The difference is amplified by efficiency: hosts have a 20% shot conversion rate versus 10% for the visitors and a higher xG (1.35 vs 1.08), increasing the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, the home team lead at the break more often (25% vs 14% for the visitors) and possess better overall season results (50% wins vs 13%), indicating match control. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1), which I assess as the strongest signal based on the above figures.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kitayosce | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.66 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kitayosce is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.2 pts / match - Pamba Jiji
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pamba Jiji is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.94 goals / match - Pamba Jiji
Kitayosce scores in 50% of matches (9 of 18 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
Pamba Jiji scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kitayosce
Over / Under - Pamba Jiji
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pamba Jiji is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.17 pts / match - Pamba Jiji
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pamba Jiji - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kitayosce
Pamba Jiji
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Kitayosce | Liga | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.06 | 1.97 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 32% | • 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 39% | 33% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 42% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 61% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitayosceAssistValentin Nouma
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kitayosce 0 - 1 - 0 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 1:0 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
Kitayosce score 1.06 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.06. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Kitayosce's matches and 33% of Pamba Jiji's.
What form are Kitayosce and Pamba Jiji in?
Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
The statistical background for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


