Finland - YkkösliigaBolt ArenaData current as of 06 September 2026

Klubi-04 vs KTP: match statistics

Klubi-04 crest
Klubi-04
0 : 1half-time 0:1
KTP crest
KTP

Klubi-04 vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Klubi-04 played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Bolt Arena. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Klubi-04: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Klubi-04 scores 0.71 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. KTP scores 1.17 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Klubi-04 71%, KTP 33%. Over 2.5: Klubi-04 29%, KTP 33%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.01. Klubi-04: 7.7 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.

Match halves

Klubi-04: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.71. KTP: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Klubi-04: 46-60 (2 goals). KTP: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is KTP: they sit 3rd in the table with a season record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, while Klubi-04 are 10th and have yet to win (0 wins, 3 draws, 4 losses). In their last 5 matches KTP average 2.0 points per game (3W, 1D, 1L), whereas Klubi-04 average just 0.6 points per game (0W, 3D, 2L), indicating a clear form advantage for the visitors. The visitors create significantly more chances: on the road they average 15.75 shots and 3.25 on target per match with xG 1.63, while the hosts at home average 8 shots and 2 on target with xG 1.06 — KTP therefore generates 0.57 more xG and nearly twice as many shot attempts. Defensively the gap also favors KTP — the visitors have 75% of away matches with a clean sheet, hosts have 0% clean sheets at home and lose 67% of their home games; average goals are 1.0 scored by KTP away versus 0.67 for the hosts at home, and 1.25 conceded by the visitors versus 1.33 conceded by the hosts. Considering superior form (2.0 vs 0.6 pts/game), markedly higher quality of chances (xG 1.63 vs 1.06) and a high clean-sheet rate for the visitors, I predict a KTP victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Klubi-04 scores on average 1.5 goals and concedes 0.5 per home match, while KTP as the away side averages 1.0 scored and 1.25 conceded. This season Klubi-04 has BTTS at 50% and clean sheets in 50% of home games, whereas KTP has BTTS 25% and as many as 75% clean sheets on the road; the league overall posts BTTS 41% and clean sheets in 71% of fixtures, indicating a tendency toward matches featuring at least one clean sheet. Looking at xG: the hosts generate xG 1.81 versus xG against KTP 1.19, and the visitors have xG 1.63 against the hosts' defensive xG 0.95; a simple averaging yields expected goals of ~1.5 for Klubi-04 and ~1.29 for KTP, which in a raw estimate implies roughly a 56% chance of BTTS. However, KTP’s high rate of clean sheets (75%) and the visitors’ low seasonal BTTS (25%), together with the league’s 71% clean-sheet rate, reduce this theoretical estimate and shift probability toward No Goal. Therefore I assign BTTS - Yes 40% and No Goal 60%, and recommend 'no' as it aligns better with the away clean-sheet advantage and seasonal indicators.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model based on xG and defensive averages forecasts 1.50 expected goals for Klubi-04 (home side: 1.81 xG in attack vs 1.19 xG conceded to KTP) and 1.29 for KTP (KTP: 1.63 xG in attack vs 0.95 xG conceded to the hosts), yielding a total of 2.79 expected goals. With λ=2.79, the Poisson distribution implies roughly a 77% probability of more than 1.5 goals (2+), about 53% for over 2.5 and around 31% for over 3.5. Additionally, Klubi-04 averages 5.0 shots on target with a 10% conversion versus KTP’s 3.25 shots and 6% conversion, which increases the hosts’ scoring probability; however, KTP keeps clean sheets in 75% of away matches, which partially limits the risk of a high-scoring game. Considering the home xG advantage and the 2.79 total forecast, the strongest data-driven signal is to back Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Klubi-04 drew at half-time in all of their home matches (2 of 2, 100%) and have an average goals at half-time of 0.0, while scoring an average of 1.5 goals in the second half (scoredAVGHT_home 0.0; scored_2hg_avg_home 1.5). The hosts win all home matches (winPercentage_home 100.0) and win the second half in 100% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home 100.0), which strongly supports a turnaround after the break. KTP averages 0.25 goals at half-time and concedes 0.5 goals at half-time (scoredAVGHT_away 0.25; concededAVGHT_away 0.5), and their attacking xG is 1.63 versus 1.81 for the hosts, so the away side is less threatening in the first half. Additionally, the hosts’ conversion rate is 10% versus 6% for the visitors (shot_conversion_rate_home 10.0; shot_conversion_rate_away 6.0) and most of the hosts’ goals come after the 60th minute (2 goals in 61–75 and 1 in 76–90), which confirms the scenario of a lead at the break for a Klubi-04 turnaround. I therefore consider X/1 the most probable Half-Time/Full-Time outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Klubi-04KTP
6Shots14
Klubi-04KTP
4Shots on target6
Klubi-04KTP
1.03xG1.74
Klubi-04KTP
1Corners3
Klubi-04KTP
50Dangerous attacks61
Klubi-04KTP
13Fouls15
Klubi-04KTP
0Cards1
Klubi-04KTP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.71Goals scored / match1.17
Klubi-04KTP
1.29Goals conceded / match1
Klubi-04KTP
52%Average possession53%
Klubi-04KTP
2.71Shots on target / match3.83
Klubi-04KTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.71Shots per match15.33
Klubi-04KTP
2.71Shots on target3.83
Klubi-04KTP
9.3%Shot conversion7.6%
Klubi-04KTP
52%Possession53%
Klubi-04KTP
1.01xG for1.69
Klubi-04KTP
1.35xG against1.11
Klubi-04KTP

Shooting quality

Klubi-04: BalancedKTP: Attacking
Klubi-04KTP
Accuracy (shots on target)35%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Klubi-04 · 2 pts / match - KTP

Klubi-04
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W43% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-4
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 at home
0-1-2
LLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
KTP
DWLWW
Season result split
67% W17% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-1
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
DWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Klubi-04 · 1.17 goals / match - KTP

KTP is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Klubi-04 · 1 goals / match - KTP

Klubi-04 scoring profile: mixed

Klubi-04 scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Klubi-04 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

5Goals scored (season)7
Klubi-04KTP
9Goals conceded (season)6
Klubi-04KTP
2Average goals in match2.17
Klubi-04KTP
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Klubi-04KTP
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Klubi-04KTP

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal83%
Klubi-04KTP
0%2 goals33%
Klubi-04KTP
0%3 goals0%
Klubi-04KTP
0%4 goals0%
Klubi-04KTP

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal33%
Klubi-04KTP
29%2 goals17%
Klubi-04KTP
0%3 goals17%
Klubi-04KTP
0%4 goals17%
Klubi-04KTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
Klubi-04KTP
0%BTTS in both halves17%
Klubi-04KTP
0%Scored in both halves17%
Klubi-04KTP

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Klubi-04KTP
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Klubi-04KTP
80%BTTS - last 540%
Klubi-04KTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time17%
Klubi-04KTP
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Klubi-04KTP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Klubi-04KTP

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Klubi-04KTP
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Klubi-04KTP
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Klubi-04KTP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - Klubi-04 · 0.83 pts / match - KTP

Klubi-04 - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
KTP - half-time state
0% leading83% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)0.83
Klubi-04KTP
0Goals scored (1st half)0.17
Klubi-04KTP
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Klubi-04KTP
0.57Average goals (1st half)0.5
Klubi-04KTP
57%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Klubi-04KTP
100%No goal before half-time83%
Klubi-04KTP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)2.17
Klubi-04KTP
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1
Klubi-04KTP
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Klubi-04KTP
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Klubi-04KTP
43%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Klubi-04KTP
29%No goal after half-time17%
Klubi-04KTP

Klubi-04 - second-half results

14% W71% R14% P
4
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - second-half results

67% W17% R17% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Klubi-04 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Klubi-04
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KTP
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Klubi-04

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

Klubi-04LigaKTP
Average goals in match 2.002.24 2.17
Both teams scored 71%37% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%37% 33%
Clean sheets 0%37% 67%
Goal before half-time 43%53% 17%
Goal after half-time 71%66% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per match
37%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardOnni Hänninen
  2. KTPSubstitutionOn: Roni PolatOff: Gift Okarigbedi Sunday
  3. Klubi-04SubstitutionOn: Kalle HuhtaOff: Art Berisha
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Otto EloluotoOff: Onni Hänninen
  5. Klubi-04SubstitutionOn: Liam RipponOff: Niilo Siren

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Klubi-04 vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Klubi-04 0:1 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Klubi-04 vs KTP?

Klubi-04 score 0.71 goals per game on average and KTP 1.17. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Klubi-04's matches and 33% of KTP's.

What form are Klubi-04 and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games Klubi-04 have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Klubi-04 vs KTP?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Klubi-04 vs KTP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.