KMC vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KMC played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 25 November 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KMC scores 0.29 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.40 and concedes 0.60. League average: 1.77 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KMC 14%, Mtibwa Sugar 0%. Over 2.5: KMC 29%, Mtibwa Sugar 0%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 25%.

xG, shots and style

KMC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.14. KMC: 6.6 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.8.

Match halves

KMC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.14. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

KMC: 16-30 (1 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.77 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 25%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
KMCMtibwa Sugar
6Shots5
KMCMtibwa Sugar
2Shots on target4
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1.1xG1.02
KMCMtibwa Sugar
6Corners3
KMCMtibwa Sugar
80Dangerous attacks58
KMCMtibwa Sugar
17Fouls19
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0Cards0
KMCMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.29Goals scored / match0.4
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1.57Goals conceded / match0.6
KMCMtibwa Sugar
34%Average possession29%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
2.43Shots on target / match1.4
KMCMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.57Shots per match3.8
KMCMtibwa Sugar
2.43Shots on target1.4
KMCMtibwa Sugar
4.3%Shot conversion10.5%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
34%Possession29%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1.67xG for1.14
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1.68xG against1.66
KMCMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedMtibwa Sugar: Balanced
KMCMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.30
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.120.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W0% R86% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-6
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
WLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Mtibwa Sugar
LWDDL
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mtibwa Sugar is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

0.29 goals / match - KMC · 0.4 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Mtibwa Sugar is 162% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - KMC · 0.6 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: mixed

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
KMCMtibwa Sugar
11Goals conceded (season)3
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1.86Average goals in match1
KMCMtibwa Sugar
1Goals scored (last 5)2
KMCMtibwa Sugar
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
KMCMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

29%1 goal20%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%2 goals20%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal40%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
29%2 goals20%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
29%3 goals0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
14%4 goals0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%Scored in both halves0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
20%BTTS - last 50%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time20%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mtibwa Sugar is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - KMC · 0.6 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

KMC - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)0.6
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.86Average goals (1st half)0.4
KMCMtibwa Sugar
43%Clean sheet before half-time60%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
86%No goal before half-time100%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)0.8
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
KMCMtibwa Sugar
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.2
KMCMtibwa Sugar
57%Clean sheet after half-time80%
KMCMtibwa Sugar
86%No goal after half-time100%
KMCMtibwa Sugar

KMC - second-half results

14% W43% R43% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

0% W80% R20% P
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
7%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
6%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
57%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
25%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
245%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 1.861.77 1.00
Both teams scored 14%30% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%25% 0%
Clean sheets 14%41% 60%
Goal before half-time 57%45% 40%
Goal after half-time 57%59% 20%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.77
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / match
0.64
Away goals / match
+78%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of KMC vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:0 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Mtibwa Sugar?

KMC score 0.29 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.40. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 14% of KMC's matches and 0% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are KMC and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Mtibwa Sugar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.