Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

KMC vs Namungo: match statistics

KMC crest
KMC
2 : 3half-time 1:2
Namungo crest
Namungo

KMC vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KMC played Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 24 June 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Namungo: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KMC scores 0.56 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.77 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KMC 32%, Namungo 46%. Over 2.5: KMC 40%, Namungo 19%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. KMC: 6.7 shots per match, Namungo: 8.0.

Match halves

KMC: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.28. Namungo: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

KMC: 31-45+ (4 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Namungo are the favourites based on season-long metrics: the visitors sit 11th with 5 wins, 12 draws and 9 losses, while KMC are 16th with just 2 wins, 3 draws and 20 losses. Form reinforces this gap — KMC have lost their last 5 matches and have 0 points from their last five outings, whereas Namungo in that period have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses (averaging 0.6 pts per game). Offensively KMC at home register 8.25 shots per game with 3.08 on target, scoring 0.5 goals with an xG of 1.4, but fail to score in 58% of matches; Namungo away average 6.29 shots with 2.36 on target, 0.57 goals with an xG of 1.03 and a higher conversion rate of 9%. Defensively KMC have conceded 43 goals this season and at home concede 1.25 goals on average with an xG against of 1.83, while Namungo have conceded 28 goals this season and concede 1.36 away with an xG against of 1.27, giving the visitors the edge in defensive stability and efficiency — therefore I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes as more likely (60% vs 40%) because hosts KMC have a seasonal xG of 1.54 and a season goals-per-game of 1.0, while Namungo concedes 1.36 goals per match seasonally and has only a 14% clean sheet rate. KMC averages 11.0 shots and 3.73 shots on target per game, which combined with their xG suggests a realistic chance for the hosts to score. Namungo’s last 5 matches show xG_for 1.67 and BTTS in 60% of those games; despite scoring only 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 per game), their chance creation increases the likelihood of at least one goal. Context and league history work against BTTS: the league has a seasonal BTTS rate of only 35% and 78% of matches finish with at least one clean sheet, and Namungo scores just 0.57 goals away on average, limiting the probability of both teams scoring. However, KMC’s poor defensive form — 12 goals conceded in the last 5 (2.4 per game) and only 40% BTTS in that period — outweighs this in my assessment, so I choose “Yes” as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal goals averages show KMC scores 1.0 goals per game and Namungo 0.57, giving a combined historical average of 1.57 goals per match. Shot and conversion analysis confirms this: KMC registers 11.0 shots with a 9% conversion → ~0.99 expected goals, Namungo has 6.29×9% ≈0.57, sum ≈1.56 xG. Reported xG signals higher potential (xG_for 1.54 for KMC and 1.03 for Namungo, total 2.57), but the discrepancy with actual averages (1.0 and 0.57) suggests poor finishing and that the realistic outcome will likely be closer to 1.5–1.6 goals. Seasonal rates of under 2.5 are 83% for KMC and 79% for Namungo (avg ~81%), while over 1.5 occurs in their matches 58% and 57%; this gives a strong signal for Under 2.5 despite a moderate probability of Over 1.5. Therefore I recommend backing Under 2.5 as the strongest pick: I estimate 82% for Under 2.5 and 18% for Over 2.5, while rating Over 1.5 as moderately likely (~62%) and Over 3.5 as unlikely (~12%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I project a Half-Time/Full-Time draw/draw (X/X) as the most likely outcome because KMC drew at half-time in 67% of their home matches and the overall home half-time draw rate for the season is 58%. The draw is further supported by the fact that hosts have a 58% full-time draw rate versus 33% home wins and only 7% away wins, which favors the match remaining tied. Although KMC generates more chances (on average 11 shots and 1.54 xG at home vs 6.29 shots and 1.03 xG for Namungo), the league is characterized by a high proportion of clean sheets (78% of games, 50% of home clean sheets), which supports low-scoring draws. KMC, however, is stronger in the second half (on average 0.75 goals after the break versus 0.14 for the visitors and 75% of home matches featuring at least one second-half goal), so the Half-Time draw/Home win (X/1) scenario was assigned a significant but smaller weight (17%). Consequently I allocated the highest probability to X/X (44%), while scenarios involving a lead at the break and a home or away turnaround were given correspondingly lower weights based on the above figures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
KMCNamungo
7Shots16
KMCNamungo
2Shots on target5
KMCNamungo
0.99xG1.82
KMCNamungo
4Corners11
KMCNamungo
55Dangerous attacks64
KMCNamungo
9Fouls13
KMCNamungo
0Cards0
KMCNamungo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.56Goals scored / match0.77
KMCNamungo
1.72Goals conceded / match1.08
KMCNamungo
43%Average possession46%
KMCNamungo
2.32Shots on target / match2.81
KMCNamungo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.68Shots per match8
KMCNamungo
2.32Shots on target2.81
KMCNamungo
8.4%Shot conversion9.6%
KMCNamungo
43%Possession46%
KMCNamungo
1.25xG for1.25
KMCNamungo
1.6xG against1.35
KMCNamungo

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedNamungo: Balanced
KMCNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W12% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-20
0.36 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Namungo
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W46% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-12-9
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Namungo is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

0.56 goals / match - KMC · 0.77 goals / match - Namungo

Namungo is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - KMC · 1.08 goals / match - Namungo

KMC scoring profile: mixed

KMC scores in 40% of matches (10 of 25 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: very strong

Namungo scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 matches).

14Goals scored (season)20
KMCNamungo
43Goals conceded (season)28
KMCNamungo
2.28Average goals in match1.85
KMCNamungo
4Goals scored (last 5)3
KMCNamungo
12Goals conceded (last 5)6
KMCNamungo

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal65%
KMCNamungo
12%2 goals12%
KMCNamungo
4%3 goals0%
KMCNamungo
0%4 goals0%
KMCNamungo

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal69%
KMCNamungo
40%2 goals23%
KMCNamungo
36%3 goals15%
KMCNamungo
8%4 goals0%
KMCNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time15%
KMCNamungo
4%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCNamungo
8%Scored in both halves4%
KMCNamungo

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
KMCNamungo
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
KMCNamungo
40%BTTS - last 560%
KMCNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
KMCNamungo
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
KMCNamungo
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
KMCNamungo

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
KMCNamungo
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
KMCNamungo
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KMCNamungo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Namungo is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - KMC · 1 pts / match - Namungo

KMC - half-time state
12% leading44% draw44% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1
KMCNamungo
0.28Goals scored (1st half)0.35
KMCNamungo
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
KMCNamungo
1.16Average goals (1st half)0.81
KMCNamungo
44%Clean sheet before half-time58%
KMCNamungo
72%No goal before half-time69%
KMCNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.68Points per match (2nd half)1.27
KMCNamungo
0.28Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
KMCNamungo
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
KMCNamungo
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.04
KMCNamungo
44%Clean sheet after half-time62%
KMCNamungo
80%No goal after half-time62%
KMCNamungo

KMC - second-half results

8% W44% R48% P
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - second-half results

31% W35% R35% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.60.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-7-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
9
0-15
3
6
16-30
4
8
31-45
4
6
46-60
0
7
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
202%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaNamungo
Average goals in match 2.282.15 1.85
Both teams scored 32%35% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 19%
Clean sheets 12%39% 31%
Goal before half-time 68%60% 58%
Goal after half-time 60%62% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
0.85
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Edson Erick Mwijage⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KMCGoalEdson Erick Mwijage

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KMC 0 - 0 - 1 Namungo. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KMC vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 2:3 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Namungo?

KMC score 0.56 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.77. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 32% of KMC's matches and 46% of Namungo's.

What form are KMC and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Namungo 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Namungo?

The statistical background for KMC vs Namungo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.