Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

KMC vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics

KMC crest
KMC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji

KMC vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KMC played Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KMC: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KMC scores 0.62 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 0.96 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KMC 33%, Pamba Jiji 35%. Over 2.5: KMC 38%, Pamba Jiji 43%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

KMC has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.28. KMC: 6.8 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 5.4.

Match halves

KMC: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.33. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

KMC: 46-60 (4 goals). Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pamba Jiji holds a clear advantage in the standings and seasonal metrics: they sit 8th versus KMC in 16th, have 7 wins this season compared to KMC’s 2, and have scored 22 goals versus the hosts’ 13. In their last 5 matches KMC have scored 6 goals but conceded 10 and failed to win any game (0-1-4), yielding only 0.2 points per match, while Pamba over the same period have 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses, 3 goals and 0.8 points per match. Although the hosts generate higher home xG (average 1.50 xG at home vs 1.25 xG for the visitors on the road) and produce more shots (9.11 vs 7.33), their finishing is poor — on average 0.56 goals per home match and a 6% conversion rate, whereas Pamba convert at 8% and average 0.67 goals away. KMC’s defence is also more exposed to high-quality chances (average xG against 1.82 at home vs 1.36 against Pamba away) and conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, so I favor the away win. Suggested probabilities: 55% Pamba Jiji, 25% draw, 20% KMC upset.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal and league numbers favor No Goal: KMC has 55% clean sheets at home and concedes 0.73 goals per game on the season, Pamba Jiji fails to score in 58% of away matches and averages 0.67 goals per game, while season BTTS rates are only 36% (KMC) and 33% (Pamba) versus a league level of 33%. Pamba registers 3.78 shots on target per game compared to KMC’s 2.67, but the visitors’ shot conversion is only 8% versus the hosts’ 19%, suggesting the away side creates chances but rarely converts them. Season xG are similar (1.31 for KMC vs 1.25 for Pamba), yet actual goals favor the home team (1.27 vs 0.67), i.e., the quality of chances does not translate into goals for the visitors. The counterargument is short-term variance: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of KMC’s games; KMC had xG 1.5 and conceded an average 2.0 goals (6 scored, 10 conceded), while Pamba has xG 1.44 over the last 5. Taking into account 55% home clean sheets, 58% of away matches without a goal, and low seasonal BTTS (36% and 33%) and league 33%, I assess a stronger signal for “No, both teams will not score” (~70%) versus 30% for the opposite scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average combined xG suggests roughly 2.60 goals: KMC has attacking xG 1.31, Pamba Jiji concedes on average 1.36 xG to opponents (1.34 average for home teams), while Pamba’s attacking xG is 1.25 with KMC conceding 1.26 (1.26 average for away teams). Poisson for λ=2.60 yields ~73% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~48% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~26% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5), making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Match data support this: KMC scores 1.27 goals at home on average, Pamba Jiji scores 0.67 on the road, but the visitors generate 3.78 shots on target versus KMC’s 2.67 and have xG 1.25, so they can create chances despite low finishing efficiency (8% vs 19% for the home side). Although KMC have 55% clean sheets this season, in the last 5 matches they concede on average 2.0 goals, and BTTS rates are low for both (36% and 33%), suggesting the projected ~2.6 goals may come mainly from one dominant side or isolated high-scoring fixtures. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (line 1.5) as the best choice — the high probability ~73% derived from xG 2.60 and season Over 1.5 rates (64% KMC, 67% Pamba) outweigh the signal for the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on the data, the strongest scenario is a draw at half-time with a KMC victory at full-time (X/1). KMC were level at the break in 67% of their home matches and led only in 22% of cases, with average first-half goals of 0.56 for the hosts versus 0.36 for Pamba Jiji, which favors a Half-Time draw. In the second half KMC score an average of 0.78 goals compared to just 0.09 for the visitors, and the hosts collected 15 points after the break—an average of 1.67 points per match—demonstrating their ability to stage a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.31 versus 1.25 for the guests with shot conversion rates of 19% vs 8%, so KMC have an efficiency edge and are most likely to swing the result in their favor after an HT draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
KMCPamba Jiji
5Shots13
KMCPamba Jiji
2Shots on target5
KMCPamba Jiji
1.24xG2.1
KMCPamba Jiji
2Corners4
KMCPamba Jiji
108Dangerous attacks130
KMCPamba Jiji
16Fouls22
KMCPamba Jiji
0Cards0
KMCPamba Jiji

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.62Goals scored / match0.96
KMCPamba Jiji
1.67Goals conceded / match1.04
KMCPamba Jiji
43%Average possession40%
KMCPamba Jiji
2.57Shots on target / match2.3
KMCPamba Jiji

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.76Shots per match5.43
KMCPamba Jiji
2.57Shots on target2.3
KMCPamba Jiji
9.2%Shot conversion17.6%
KMCPamba Jiji
43%Possession40%
KMCPamba Jiji
1.3xG for1.28
KMCPamba Jiji
1.58xG against1.31
KMCPamba Jiji

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedPamba Jiji: Counter-attacking
KMCPamba Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)38%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pamba Jiji is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - KMC · 0.8 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

KMC
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
10% W14% R76% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-16
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Pamba Jiji
LWLDL
Season result split
30% W39% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-7
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pamba Jiji is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.62 goals / match - KMC · 0.96 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Pamba Jiji is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - KMC · 1.04 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

KMC scoring profile: mixed

KMC scores in 43% of matches (9 of 21 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: strong

Pamba Jiji scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

13Goals scored (season)22
KMCPamba Jiji
35Goals conceded (season)24
KMCPamba Jiji
2.29Average goals in match2
KMCPamba Jiji
6Goals scored (last 5)3
KMCPamba Jiji
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
KMCPamba Jiji

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal57%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%2 goals26%
KMCPamba Jiji
5%3 goals13%
KMCPamba Jiji
0%4 goals0%
KMCPamba Jiji

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal61%
KMCPamba Jiji
38%2 goals26%
KMCPamba Jiji
33%3 goals17%
KMCPamba Jiji
10%4 goals0%
KMCPamba Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
KMCPamba Jiji
5%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCPamba Jiji
10%Scored in both halves13%
KMCPamba Jiji

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS26%
KMCPamba Jiji
60%BTTS - last 540%
KMCPamba Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
KMCPamba Jiji
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
KMCPamba Jiji
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
KMCPamba Jiji

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
KMCPamba Jiji
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
KMCPamba Jiji
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
KMCPamba Jiji

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pamba Jiji is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - KMC · 1.17 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

KMC - half-time state
14% leading48% draw38% trailing
Pamba Jiji - half-time state
17% leading65% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.17
KMCPamba Jiji
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.39
KMCPamba Jiji
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
KMCPamba Jiji
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.78
KMCPamba Jiji
48%Clean sheet before half-time65%
KMCPamba Jiji
71%No goal before half-time70%
KMCPamba Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)0.96
KMCPamba Jiji
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
KMCPamba Jiji
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
KMCPamba Jiji
1.19Average goals (2nd half)0.96
KMCPamba Jiji
43%Clean sheet after half-time61%
KMCPamba Jiji
76%No goal after half-time74%
KMCPamba Jiji

KMC - second-half results

10% W43% R48% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

17% W43% R39% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
0
7
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
206%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaPamba Jiji
Average goals in match 2.292.08 2.00
Both teams scored 33%34% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%37% 43%
Clean sheets 14%41% 39%
Goal before half-time 67%56% 48%
Goal after half-time 62%62% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KMC 0 - 0 - 1 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

KMC score 0.62 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 0.96. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KMC's matches and 35% of Pamba Jiji's.

What form are KMC and Pamba Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

The statistical background for KMC vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.