Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
KMC vs Simba: match statistics
KMC vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KMC play Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Current form
KMC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Simba: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
KMC scores 0.36 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Simba scores 2.00 and concedes 0.57. League average: 1.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KMC 21%, Simba 29%. Over 2.5: KMC 36%, Simba 57%. League level: BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 26%.
xG, shots and style
Simba has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.30. KMC: 6.8 shots per match, Simba: 8.1.
Match halves
KMC: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14. Simba: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
KMC: 16-30 (2 goals). Simba: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 26%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KMC | Simba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.15 | 0.58 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Simba is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - KMC · 2 pts / match - Simba
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 456% better for: goals scored per match.
0.36 goals / match - KMC · 2 goals / match - Simba
Simba is 163% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - KMC · 0.57 goals / match - Simba
KMC scores in 36% of matches (5 of 14 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).
Simba scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KMC
Over / Under - Simba
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 183% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - KMC · 2.43 pts / match - Simba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KMC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Simba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KMC
Simba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| KMC | Liga | Simba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.86 | 1.78 | ▲ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 21% | 29% | • 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 26% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 43% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 48% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.