Kocaelispor vs Amed: match statistics
Kocaelispor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kocaelispor played Amed in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Venue: İsmetpaşa Stadyumu. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Kocaelispor: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Amed: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kocaelispor scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Amed scores 3.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kocaelispor 0%, Amed 0%. Over 2.5: Kocaelispor 0%, Amed 100%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.39 vs 0.94. Kocaelispor: 8.0 shots per match, Amed: 13.0.
Match halves
Kocaelispor: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Amed: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 3.00.
Goals by minute
Kocaelispor: 0-15 (0 goals). Amed: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Süper Lig: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed enter the match as league leaders and won their only league fixture so far, scoring 3 goals and keeping a clean sheet. Kocaelispor sit 17th, lost their season opener 0:2, and have scored just 1 goal in their last five appearances while suffering 4 defeats. The visitors have shown significantly greater attacking potential in recent weeks, scoring 9 goals in five matches compared with the hosts’ 1. Amed are not entirely reliable defensively over a broader sample, having conceded 8 goals in their last five matches, which increases Kocaelispor’s chances of securing a draw. Nevertheless, the difference in current attacking form and the visitors’ considerably stronger start to the season point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from Kocaelispor’s very poor recent scoring record: the team has averaged just 0.2 goals over its last five matches, while its xG stood at only 0.74. BTTS landed in just 20% of the hosts’ matches, whereas Amed, despite recording goals from both teams in 60% of their games, conceded an average of 1.6 goals. Amed clearly has greater attacking potential, averaging 1.8 goals scored and an xG of 1.87 across their last five appearances, making them a realistic candidate to score. At the same time, Kocaelispor’s low attacking output and Amed’s average 1.01 xG conceded suggest that the more likely scenario is one in which at least one team—primarily the hosts—fails to find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kocaelispor has scored just 1 goal in its last five matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while its average xG was only 0.74. Amed has shown considerably greater attacking potential, scoring 9 goals during this period and generating 1.87 xG per match, although Kocaelispor conceded just 1.2 goals on average. The hosts’ matches have stayed under 2.5 goals in each of their last five appearances, while the same occurred in 60% of Amed’s matches. The projected total of 2.31 goals suggests a realistic chance of two or three goals, but clearly limits the likelihood of a scenario requiring at least four goals. Therefore, the safest pick is Under 3.5 goals, supported by Kocaelispor’s weak current attacking form and the moderate expected goal total.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest first-half signal is a draw: Amed were level at the break in all of their last five matches, while Kocaelispor were level in three of five. The hosts scored just 0.2 goals per match before half-time and never led, whereas Amed scored 0.6 goals but also never went into the interval with an advantage. After the break, the form advantage clearly shifts towards the visitors: Amed average 1.2 goals in second halves, while Kocaelispor have failed to score in any of their last five matches after half-time. Kocaelispor have lost four of their last five matches and are recording just 0.2 points per game, whereas Amed have lost only once, drawing three times and winning once. A draw at half-time followed by an Amed win is therefore the most likely scenario, although the visitors’ high draw rate also gives the X/X outcome a significant chance.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kocaelispor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.60 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kocaelispor scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
Amed scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Kocaelispor keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kocaelispor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kocaelispor - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Amed - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kocaelispor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Kocaelispor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.53 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 41% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 41% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 29% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 65% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Kocaelispor vs Amed?
The Süper Lig match finished Kocaelispor 2:0 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kocaelispor vs Amed?
Kocaelispor score 0.00 goals per game on average and Amed 3.00. The Süper Lig average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Kocaelispor's matches and 0% of Amed's.
What form are Kocaelispor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Kocaelispor have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Amed 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kocaelispor vs Amed?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kocaelispor vs Amed: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


